Literature DB >> 24842828

Active workstations to fight sedentary behaviour.

Tine Torbeyns1, Stephen Bailey, Inge Bos, Romain Meeusen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of active workstations has been studied in several settings, and several outcomes have been investigated. However, the effects on health, work performance, quality of life, etc., have never been systematically reviewed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existing literature about active workstations and their possible positive health and work performance effects. DATA SOURCES: We searched the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science (up until 28 February 2014). The search terms we used were 'active workstation', 'standing workstation', 'standing desk', 'stand up workstation', 'stand up desk', 'walking desk', 'walking workstation', 'treadmill workstation', 'treadmill desk', 'cycling workstation', 'cycling desk' and 'bike desk', in combination with 'health', 'quality of life', 'cognition', 'computer task performance', 'absenteeism', 'productivity', 'academic achievement', 'cognitive decline', and 'independent living'. In addition, we searched the reference lists of relevant published articles. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials and non-randomized non-controlled trials investigating the introduction of active workstations in humans were included in this systematic review. Only original studies were included, and we did not accept studies combining the introduction of active workstations with other interventions. Outcomes concerning health, energy expenditure, cognition, quality of life and work performance were included.
RESULTS: We included 32 studies, of which five were longitudinal studies in school-aged children, 10 were longitudinal studies in adults and 17 were non-longitudinal studies in adults. Sixteen studies investigated standing desks, 15 investigated walking desks, and one investigated a cycling workstation. The general findings were decreased sitting time, increased energy expenditure, a positive effect on several health markers, no detrimental effect on work performance, no acute effect on cognitive function and no straightforward findings concerning computer task performance.
CONCLUSION: The implementation of active workstations might contribute to improving people's health and physical activity levels. The effect of the use of these active workstations on cognition and applied work tasks, such as computer task performance, needs further investigation before conclusions can be drawn. Another aspect that needs further investigation is the implementation of the different active workstations in all age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842828     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0202-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  49 in total

Review 1.  Neurogenesis and exercise: past and future directions.

Authors:  Henriette van Praag
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.843

2.  Feasibility of a walking workstation to increase daily walking.

Authors:  W G Thompson; R C Foster; D S Eide; J A Levine
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Energy expenditure comparison: a pilot study of standing instead of sitting at work for obesity prevention.

Authors:  Rebecca M Speck; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic achievement.

Authors:  Joseph E Donnelly; Kate Lambourne
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 5.  Does physical activity impact on presenteeism and other indicators of workplace well-being?

Authors:  Helen E Brown; Nicholas D Gilson; Nicola W Burton; Wendy J Brown
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Difference in caloric expenditure in sitting versus standing desks.

Authors:  Christopher Reiff; Kara Marlatt; Donald R Dengel
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2012-09

7.  Productivity of transcriptionists using a treadmill desk.

Authors:  Warren G Thompson; James A Levine
Journal:  Work       Date:  2011

8.  Sitting habits in elementary schoolchildren: a traditional versus a "Moving school".

Authors:  Greet Cardon; Dirk De Clercq; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Dieter Breithecker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-08

9.  The introduction of sit-stand worktables; aspects of attitudes, compliance and satisfaction.

Authors:  Stephen Wilks; Monica Mortimer; Per Nylén
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.940

10.  Treadmill workstations: the effects of walking while working on physical activity and work performance.

Authors:  Avner Ben-Ner; Darla J Hamann; Gabriel Koepp; Chimnay U Manohar; James Levine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.752

View more
  30 in total

1.  Effect of Using a Sit-Stand Desk on Ratings of Discomfort, Fatigue, and Sleepiness Across a Simulated Workday in Overweight and Obese Adults.

Authors:  Robert J Kowalsky; Sophy J Perdomo; John M Taormina; Christopher E Kline; Andrea L Hergenroeder; Jeffrey R Balzer; John M Jakicic; Bethany Barone Gibbs
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 2.  Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.

Authors:  Nipun Shrestha; Katriina T Kukkonen-Harjula; Jos H Verbeek; Sharea Ijaz; Veerle Hermans; Soumyadeep Bhaumik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-17

3.  Sitting is the new smoking: where do we stand?

Authors:  Benjamin Baddeley; Sangeetha Sornalingam; Max Cooper
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  What is the metabolic and energy cost of sitting, standing and sit/stand transitions?

Authors:  Pedro B Júdice; Marc T Hamilton; Luís B Sardinha; Theodore W Zderic; Analiza M Silva
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The Effectiveness of Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Workplace Interventions on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marsha L Brierley; Angel M Chater; Lindsey R Smith; Daniel P Bailey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Effects of cycling workstation to get tertiary employee moving on their overall health: study protocol for a REMOVE trial.

Authors:  Terry Guirado; Lore Metz; Bruno Pereira; Audrey Bergouignan; David Thivel; Martine Duclos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Effects of an "Active-Workstation" Cluster RCT on Daily Waking Physical Behaviors.

Authors:  Diego Arguello; Anne N Thorndike; Gregory Cloutier; Alvin Morton; Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa; Dinesh John
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-07-01

8.  Increasing physical activity in office workers--the Inphact Treadmill study; a study protocol for a 13-month randomized controlled trial of treadmill workstations.

Authors:  Frida Bergman; Carl-Johan Boraxbekk; Patrik Wennberg; Ann Sörlin; Tommy Olsson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers' sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot.

Authors:  Josephine Y Chau; Michelle Daley; Scott Dunn; Anu Srinivasan; Anna Do; Adrian E Bauman; Hidde P van der Ploeg
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Factors associated with self-reported capacity to walk, jog and run in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Gizem İrem Kinikli; Susanne Pettersson; Sevilay Karahan; Iva Gunnarsson; Elisabet Svenungsson; Carina Boström
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 1.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.