During the three decades 1980-2010, magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR developed into the method of choice to examine many chemical, physical, and biological problems. In particular, a variety of dipolar recoupling methods to measure distances and torsion angles can now constrain molecular structures to high resolution. However, applications are often limited by the low sensitivity of the experiments, due in large part to the necessity of observing spectra of low-γ nuclei such as the I = 1/2 species (13)C or (15)N. The difficulty is still greater when quadrupolar nuclei, such as (17)O or (27)Al, are involved. This problem has stimulated efforts to increase the sensitivity of MAS experiments. A particularly powerful approach is dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) which takes advantage of the higher equilibrium polarization of electrons (which conventionally manifests in the great sensitivity advantage of EPR over NMR). In DNP, the sample is doped with a stable paramagnetic polarizing agent and irradiated with microwaves to transfer the high polarization in the electron spin reservoir to the nuclei of interest. The idea was first explored by Overhauser and Slichter in 1953. However, these experiments were carried out on static samples, at magnetic fields that are low by current standards. To be implemented in contemporary MAS NMR experiments, DNP requires microwave sources operating in the subterahertz regime, roughly 150-660 GHz, and cryogenic MAS probes. In addition, improvements were required in the polarizing agents, because the high concentrations of conventional radicals that are required to produce significant enhancements compromise spectral resolution. In the last two decades, scientific and technical advances have addressed these problems and brought DNP to the point where it is achieving wide applicability. These advances include the development of high frequency gyrotron microwave sources operating in the subterahertz frequency range. In addition, low temperature MAS probes were developed that permit in situ microwave irradiation of the samples. And, finally, biradical polarizing agents were developed that increased the efficiency of DNP experiments by factors of ∼4 at considerably lower paramagnet concentrations. Collectively, these developments have made it possible to apply DNP on a routine basis to a number of different scientific endeavors, most prominently in the biological and material sciences. This Account reviews these developments, including the primary mechanisms used to transfer polarization in high frequency DNP, and the current choice of microwave sources and biradical polarizing agents. In addition, we illustrate the utility of the technique with a description of applications to membrane and amyloid proteins that emphasizes the unique structural information that is available in these two cases.
During the three decades 1980-2010, magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR developed into the method of choice to examine many chemical, physical, and biological problems. In particular, a variety of dipolar recoupling methods to measure distances and torsion angles cannow constrain molecular structures to high resolution. However, applications are often limited by the low sensitivity of the experiments, due in large part to the necessity of observing spectra of low-γ nuclei such as the I = 1/2 species (13)C or (15)n class="Chemical">N. The difficulty is still greater when quadrupolar nuclei, such as (17)O or (27)Al, are involved. This problem has stimulated efforts to increase the sensitivity of MAS experiments. A particularly powerful approach is dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) which takes advantage of the higher equilibrium polarization of electrons (which conventionally manifests in the great sensitivity advantage of EPR over NMR). In DNP, the sample is doped with a stable paramagnetic polarizing agent and irradiated with microwaves to transfer the high polarization in the electron spin reservoir to the nuclei of interest. The idea was first explored by Overhauser and Slichter in 1953. However, these experiments were carried out on static samples, at magnetic fields that are low by current standards. To be implemented in contemporary MAS NMR experiments, DNP requires microwave sources operating in the subterahertz regime, roughly 150-660 GHz, and cryogenic MAS probes. In addition, improvements were required in the polarizing agents, because the high concentrations of conventional radicals that are required to produce significant enhancements compromise spectral resolution. In the last two decades, scientific and technical advances have addressed these problems and brought DNP to the point where it is achieving wide applicability. These advances include the development of high frequency gyrotron microwave sources operating in the subterahertz frequency range. In addition, low temperature MAS probes were developed that permit in situ microwave irradiation of the samples. And, finally, biradical polarizing agents were developed that increased the efficiency of DNP experiments by factors of ∼4 at considerably lower paramagnet concentrations. Collectively, these developments have made it possible to apply DNP on a routine basis to a number of different scientific endeavors, most prominently in the biological and material sciences. This Account reviews these developments, including the primary mechanisms used to transfer polarization in high frequency DNP, and the current choice of microwave sources and biradical polarizing agents. In addition, we illustrate the utility of the technique with a description of applications to membrane and amyloid proteins that emphasizes the unique structural information that is available in these two cases.
Authors: Alexander B Barnes; Björn Corzilius; Melody L Mak-Jurkauskas; Loren B Andreas; Vikram S Bajaj; Yoh Matsuki; Marina L Belenky; Johan Lugtenburg; Jagadishwar R Sirigiri; Richard J Temkin; Judith Herzfeld; Robert G Griffin Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2010-05-08 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Christopher P Jaroniec; Cait E MacPhee; Vikram S Bajaj; Michael T McMahon; Christopher M Dobson; Robert G Griffin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-01-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thorsten Maly; Galia T Debelouchina; Vikram S Bajaj; Kan-Nian Hu; Chan-Gyu Joo; Melody L Mak-Jurkauskas; Jagadishwar R Sirigiri; Patrick C A van der Wel; Judith Herzfeld; Richard J Temkin; Robert G Griffin Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Alexander B Barnes; Emilio A Nanni; Judith Herzfeld; Robert G Griffin; Richard J Temkin Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Olesya Haze; Björn Corzilius; Albert A Smith; Robert G Griffin; Timothy M Swager Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jakob Maciejko; Jagdeep Kaur; Johanna Becker-Baldus; Clemens Glaubitz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ivan V Sergeyev; Boris Itin; Rivkah Rogawski; Loren A Day; Ann E McDermott Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sudheer K Jawla; Robert G Griffin; Ivan A Mastovsky; Michael A Shapiro; Richard J Temkin Journal: IEEE Trans Electron Devices Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 2.917