| Literature DB >> 23593367 |
Andras Jakab1, Miklos Emri, Tamas Spisak, Anita Szeman-Nagy, Monika Beres, Sandor Attila Kis, Peter Molnar, Ervin Berenyi.
Abstract
Attempts to explicate the neural abnormalities behind autism spectrum disorders frequently revealed impaired brain connectivity, yet our knowledge is limited about the alterations linked with autistic traits in the non-clinical population. In our study, we aimed at exploring the neural correlates of dimensional autistic traits using a dual approach of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and graph theoretical analysis of resting state functional MRI data. Subjects were sampled from a public neuroimaging dataset of healthy volunteers. Inclusion criteria were adult age (age: 18-65), availability of DTI and resting state functional acquisitions and psychological evaluation including the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and Autistic Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ). The final subject cohort consisted of 127 neurotypicals. Global brain network structure was described by graph theoretical parameters: global and average local efficiency. Regional topology was characterized by degree and efficiency. We provided measurements for diffusion anisotropy. The association between autistic traits and the neuroimaging findings was studied using a general linear model analysis, controlling for the effects of age, gender and IQ profile. Significant negative correlation was found between the degree and efficiency of the right posterior cingulate cortex and autistic traits, measured by the combination of ASSQ and SRS scores. Autistic phenotype was associated with the decrease of whole-brain local efficiency. Reduction of diffusion anisotropy was found bilaterally in the temporal fusiform and parahippocampal gyri. Numerous models describe the autistic brain connectome to be dominated by reduced long-range connections and excessive short-range fibers. Our finding of decreased efficiency supports this hypothesis although the only prominent effect was seen in the posterior limbic lobe, which is known to act as a connector hub. The neural correlates of the autistic trait in neurotypicals showed only limited similarities to the reported findings in clinical populations with low functioning autism.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23593367 PMCID: PMC3618514 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic data of the study population and summary of psychological evaluations.
| Total population | Females | Males | |
| n | 127 | 49 | 78 |
| Age | 35.8±12.8 (18–65) | 36.3±13.2 (19–64) | 35.5±12.6 (18–65) |
| Full Scale IQ | 108.3±13.1 (74–137) | 107.9±13.4 (80–137) | 108.5±13.1 (74–136) |
| Verbal IQ | 106.9±13 (67–134) | 106.4±12.9 (79–129) | 107.1±13.2 (67–134) |
| ASSQ Score | 5.2±7.9 (0–39) | 4±5.9 (0–22) | 6±8.9 (0–39) |
| SRS Total Score | 27.2±19.4 (0–109) | 22±14.6 (1–71) | 30.4±21.4 (0–109) |
Data are given in mean ± standard deviation (range: minimum – maximum) format. ASSQ: Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire, SRS: Social Responsiveness Scale.
Figure 1Demographic data of the study population.
Distribution of subject age, full scale IQ, verbal IQ, ASSQ and SRS scores. Data are depicted as histograms (left panels) and Q-Q (quantile-quantile) probability plots (right panels) in which reference lines of the normal distribution are given (n = 127).
Figure 2Processing pipeline of resting state functional MRI data.
Panel A, far left: two atlas regions, Inferior Frontal Gyrus, triangular part (red, R23) and Middle Temporal Gyrus temporooccipital part (blue, R58) were overlaid on an atlas-space aligned fMRI image. The corresponding regional BOLD curves and their wavelet coefficients are shown on next images. Accordingly, the TR = 2500 ms repetition time and the four level wavelet decomposition the evaluated wavelet coefficients of four frequency bands (0.1–0.2 Hz, 0.05–0.1 Hz, 0.025–0.05 Hz, 0.0125–0.025 Hz) were generated (middle bottom image). In the 4th column the evaluated wavelet correlation matrix (top) and the distribution of correlation coefficients (bottom) are shown. We used these wavelet correlation values between each pair of brain regions to construct the matrix in which yellow color represents high correlation coefficients while red means low values. Panel B: In the bottom row, three adjacency matrices are shown with wired costs 0.1, 0.4 and 0.9. These matrices were generated from the weighted connectivity matrix (4th panel, right bottom image) by different weight thresholds. Vertical gray arrows represent the calculation procedure of nodal and global network parameters at different cost levels. The horizontal gray arrows demonstrate the final step of Monte-Carlo based cost-integration procedure in which the summed parameters are divided by the integration steps (MC).
Figure 3Distribution of global functional network properties.
Global efficiency (Eg) and average local efficiency (El). Data are depicted as histograms (left panels) and Q-Q (quantile-quantile) probability plots (right panels) in which reference lines of the normal distribution are given (n = 127).
Figure 4Small-world properties of functional and synthetic networks.
Global (Eg) and local (El) efficiencies are depicted as a function of wired-cost for random (red), a regular (blue) and the investigated human brain networks. In latter case, the averages (black line) and the standard deviation (gray band) of efficiency values are shown. The Eg and El of brain networks monotonically increase by the cost with relatively low standard deviation. This means that all brain networks have simultaneously high Eg and El values in the [0.34–0.5] cost-range, which verify that these networks have small-world properties.
Global graph theoretical network correlates of autistic traits, age, gender and IQ using GLM.
| Dependent variables in the GLM design | Covariates in GLM (variables to control) | Association with Global efficiency Eg | Association with Average local efficiency El |
| Age | - | F: 0.25 | F: 6.54 |
| p: 0.62 | p: 0.012 | ||
| ηp 2: 0.002 | ηp 2: 0.046 | ||
| Bage: 6.07*10−5 | Bage: 2.59*10−4 | ||
| Gender | - | F: 0.55 | F: 2.02 |
| p: 0.46 | p: 0.16 | ||
| ηp 2: 0.004 | ηp 2: 0.015 | ||
| BGender: 2.67*10−3 | BGender: 3.9*10−3 | ||
| WASI Verbal IQ | Age, Gender |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| BWASI: 1.94*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.016; p: 0.16) | BWASI: 8.79*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.0055; p: 0.41) | ||
| BAge: 4.59*10−5 (ηp 2: 8.6*10−4; p: 0.75) | BAge: 2.45*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.04; p: 0.026) | ||
| BGender: 8.8*10−4 (ηp 2: 4.57*10−4; p: 0.81) | BGender: 0.0035 (ηp 2: 0.012; p: 0.22) | ||
| ASSQ Score | Age, Gender |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| BASSQ: 5.24*10−5 (ηp 2: 3.8*10−4; p: 0.82) | BASSQ: −4.28*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.046; p: 0.013) | ||
| BAge: 6.21*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.0016; p: 0.65) | BAge: 2.45*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.044; p: 0.015) | ||
| BGender: 0.003 (ηp 2: 0.0037; p: 0.49) | BGender: 0.0048 (ηp 2: 0.024; p: 0.075) | ||
| SRS Total Score | Age, Gender |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| BSRS: −1.04*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.0088; p: 0.29) | BSRS: −8.72*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.011; p: 0.25) | ||
| BAge: 4.92*10−5 (ηp 2: 9.2*10−3; p: 0.74) | BAge: 2.56*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.042; p: 0.022) | ||
| BGender: 0.0046 (ηp 2: 0.011; p: 0.25) | BGender: 0.005 (ηp 2: 0.023; p: 0.091) | ||
| ASSQ | Age, Gender |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| BSRS: −1.23*10−4 (ηp 2: 8.6*10−3; p: 0.31) | BSRS: 1.95*10−5 (ηp 2: 4*10−4; p: 0.83) | ||
| BASSQ: 8.46*10−5 (ηp 2: 7.02*10−3; p: 0.77) | BASSQ: −4.62*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.037; p: 0.033) | ||
| BAge: 5.65*10−5 (ηp 2: 1.2*10−3; p: 0.71) | BAge: 2.16*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.031; p: 0.053) | ||
| BGender: 4.58*10−3 (ηp 2: 0.011 p: 0.25) | BGender: 0.0049 (ηp 2: 0.024; p: 0.089) | ||
| ASSQ | Age, Gender, WASI Verbal IQ |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| BSRS: −9.14*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.0047; p: 0.47) | BSRS: 5.14*10−6 (ηp 2: 2.5*10−5; p: 0.96) | ||
| BASSQ: 3.2*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.01; p: 0.28) | BASSQ: −4.26*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.03; p: 0.065) | ||
| BAge: 3.73*10−5 (ηp 2: 5.2*10−3; p: 0.81) | BAge: 1.88*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.022; p: 0.12) | ||
| BVIQ: 3*10−3 (ηp 2: 0.028; p: 0.078) | BVIQ: −7.34 *10−6 (ηp 2: 2.9*10−5; p: 0.96) | ||
| BGender: 0.0023 (ηp 2: 0.0028; p: 0.58) | BGender: 4.8*10−3 (ηp 2: 0.021 p: 0.13) |
GLM: General Linear Model, ASSQ: Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire, SRS: Social Responsiveness Scale.
: p<0.05
Regional neural correlates of self-reported autistic traits, GLM design 1.
| Region name | Nodal Degree | Nodal Efficiency | Regional Diffusion Anisotropy |
| Right cingulate gyrus, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: −0.51 (ηp
2: 0.11; p: 1.64*10−4) | BASSQ: −1.9*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.11; p: 1.8*10−4) | BASSQ: −7.15*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.002; p: 0.65) | |
| BSRS: 0.083 (ηp 2: 0.019; p: 0.13) | BSRS: 3.5*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.022; p: 0.1) | BSRS: 2.37*10−6 (ηp 2: 1.1*10−5; p: 0.97) | |
| BAge: −0.018 (ηp 2: 0.001; p: 0.79) | BAge: −8.8*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.001; p: 0.74) | BAge: −9.47*10−7 (ηp 2: 0.012; p: 0.23) | |
| BGender: −0.41 (ηp 2: 4.33*10−4; p: 0.82) | BGender: −1.8*10−3 (ηp 2: 5.8*10−4; p: 0.79) | BGender: 4*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.034; p: 0.044) | |
| Left cingulate gyrus, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: −0.37 (ηp
2: 0.068; p: 0.004) | BASSQ: −1.4*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.065; p: 0.004) | BASSQ: 3.15*10−5 (ηp 2: 2.61*10−4; p: 0.86) | |
| BSRS: 0.072 (ηp 2: 0.016; p: 0.16) | BSRS: 3.08*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.02; p: 0.12) | BSRS: 3.78*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.002; p: 0.61) | |
| BAge: 0.062 (ηp 2: 0.008; p: 0.33) | BAge: 2.3*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.007; p: 0.34) | BAge: −1.11*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.012; p: 0.23) | |
| BGender: −0.27 (ηp 2: 2.1*10−4; p: 0.88) | BGender: −1.2*10−3 (ηp 2: 2.9*10−4; p: 0.85) | BGender: 2.2*10−3 (ηp 2: 0.007; p: 0.36) | |
| Right parahippocampal gyrus, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: 0.12 (ηp 2: 0.002; p: 0.66) | BASSQ: 6.7*10−4 (ηp 2: 1.4*10−3; p: 0.69) | BASSQ: −1.1*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.066; p: 0.005) | |
| BSRS: 0.007 (ηp 2: 2.8*10−5; p: 0.95) | BSRS: 1.4*10−4 (ηp 2: 3.5*10−4; p: 0.84) | BSRS: 1.5*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.008; p: 0.34) | |
| BAge: 0.085 (ηp 2: 0.003; p: 0.54) | BAge: 1.52*10−6 (ηp 2: ∼0 p: 0.99) | BAge: 5.32*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.001; p: 0.78) | |
| BGender: 6.34 (ηp 2: 0.024; p: 0.089) | BGender: 0.051 (ηp
2: 0.04; p: 0.026) | BGender: 3.8*10−3 (ηp 2: 0.005; p: 0.45) | |
| Right temporal fusiform cortex, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: 0.14 (ηp 2: 0.003; p: 0.53) | BASSQ: 7.5*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.004; p: 0.48) | BASSQ: −6.7*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.051; p: 0.013) | |
| BSRS: −0.029 (ηp 2: 0.001; p: 0.75) | BSRS: −1.11*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.001; p: 0.8) | BSRS: 8.95*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.005; p: 0.42) | |
| BAge: 0.084 (ηp 2: 0.005; p: 0.45) | BAge: 3.5*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.003; p: 0.53) | BAge: 9.46*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.004; p: 0.49) | |
| BGender: 3.7 (ηp 2: 0.013; p: 0.21) | BGender: 0.015 (ηp 2: 0.009; p: 0.29) | BGender: −1.4*10−3 (ηp 2: 0.001; p: 0.71) |
We demonstrate the joint effects of Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS Total Score) and Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ), controlling for age and gender. GLM: General Linear Model.
: 0.01≤p<0.05.
: 0.001≤p<0.01.
: p<0.001.
: Significant interaction after false discovery rate correction with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
Figure 5Regional graph theoretical correlates of self-reported autistic traits.
Left panels: observed vs. predicted values of the dependent variables in the general linear model analysis. Middle panels: predicted values vs. ASSQ score. Right panels: predicted values vs. SRS total scores.
Figure 6Regional diffusion anisotropy correlates of self-reported autistic traits.
Left panels: observed vs. predicted values of the dependent variables in the general linear model analysis. Middle panels: predicted values vs. ASSQ score. Right panels: predicted values vs. SRS total scores.
Regional neural correlates of self-reported autistic traits, controlled for verbal IQ: GLM design 2.
| Region name | Nodal Degree | Nodal Efficiency | Regional Diffusion Anisotropy |
| Right cingulate gyrus, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: −0.49 (ηp
2: 0.102; p: 5.6*10−4) | BASSQ: −1.8*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.092; p: 0.001) | BASSQ: −1.2*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.0047; p: 0.47) | |
| BSRS: 0.081 (ηp 2: 0.017; p: 0.17) | BSRS: 3.5*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.02; p: 0.13) | BSRS: −2.7*10−5 (ηp 2:1.3*10−3; p: 0.71) | |
| BAge: −0.017 (ηp 2: 4.7*10−4; p: 0.82) | BAge: −6.9*10−5 (ηp 2: 5.4*10−4; p: 0.81) | BAge: −7.6*10−5 (ηp 2: 0.0069; p: 0.38) | |
| Bviq: 0.04 (ηp 2: 2.3*10−3; p: 0.61) | Bviq: 2.9*10−4 (ηp 2: 7.9*10−3; p: 0.35) | Bviq: −1.6*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.026; p: 0.088) | |
| BGender: −0.25 (ηp 2: 1.6*10−4; p: 0.89) | BGender: −1.9*10−3 (ηp 2: 6.2*10−4; p: 0.79) | BGender: 0.0053(ηp
2: 0.049; p: 0.019) | |
| Left cingulate gyrus, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: −0.36 (ηp
2: 0.064; p: 0.007) | BASSQ: −1.3*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.053; p: 0.014) | BASSQ: −2.2*10−5 (ηp 2: 1.1*10−4; p: 0.91) | |
| BSRS: 0.095 (ηp 2: 0.025; p: 0.092) | BSRS: 3.9*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.03; p: 0.067) | BSRS: 1.4*10−5 (ηp 2: 2.8*10−4; p: 0.86) | |
| BAge: 0.074 (ηp 2: 0.01; p: 0.28) | BAge: 2.9*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.011; p: 0.28) | BAge: −1.5*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.021; p: 0.13) | |
| Bviq: 0.071 (ηp 2: 0.008; p: 0.34) | Bviq: 3.8*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.016; p: 0.19) | Bviq: −1.3*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.014; p: 0.22) | |
| BGender: −0.056 (ηp 2: 9*10−6; p: 0.97) | BGender: −9.6*10−4 (ηp 2: 1.7*10−4; p: 0.89) | BGender: 0.0028 (ηp 2: 0.01; p: 0.29) | |
| Left parahippocampal gyrus, anterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: 0.33 (ηp 2: 0.016; p: 0.18) | BASSQ: 1.8*10−3 (ηp 2: 0.019; p: 0.14) | BASSQ: −7.5*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.073; p: 0.004) | |
| BSRS: −0.2 (ηp 2: 0.031; p: 0.062) | BSRS: −8.4*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.023; p: 0.11) | BSRS: −5.7*10−6 (ηp 2: 2.5*10−4; p: 0.96) | |
| BAge: 0.11 (ηp 2: 6.1*10−3; p: 0.41) | BAge: 4.7*10−4 (ηp 2: 4.7*10−3; p: 0.47) | BAge: −1.5*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.012; p: 0.25) | |
| Bviq: 0.075 (ηp 2: 3.2*10−3; p: 0.59) | Bviq: 5.6*10−4 (ηp 2: 5.8*10−3; p: 0.42) | Bviq: −5.6*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.12; p: 1.7*10−4) | |
| BGender: 0.94 (ηp 2: 1.4*10−3; p: 0.78) | BGender: 3.3*10−3 (ηp 2: 3.6*10−4; p: 0.84) | BGender: 8.7*10−4 (ηp 2: 5.7*10−4; p: 0.8) | |
| Right parahippocampal gyrus, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: 0.11 (ηp 2: 1.3*10−3; p: 0.69) | BASSQ: 9.8*10−4 (ηp 2: 2.8*10−3; p: 0.58) | BASSQ: −1.2*10−3 (ηp
2: 0.088; p: 0.001) | |
| BSRS: −4.3*10−4 (ηp 2: ∼0; p: 0.99) | BSRS: 1.8*10−4 (ηp 2: 5.1*10−4; p: 0.81) | BSRS: 7.1*10−5 (ηp 2: 1.7*10−3; p: 0.66) | |
| BAge: 0.14 (ηp 2: 7.8*10−3; p: 0.35) | BAge: 2.8*10−4 (ηp 2: 8.2*10−4; p: 0.76) | BAge: −1.2*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.003; p: 0.54) | |
| Bviq: 0.025 (ηp 2: 2.2*10−4; p: 0.87) | Bviq: 7.3*10−4 (ηp 2: 4.7*10−3; p: 0.47) | Bviq: −3.6*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.025; p: 0.098) | |
| BGender: 6.2 (ηp 2: 0.022; p: 0.11) | BGender: 0.048 (ηp
2: 0.035; p: 0.046) | BGender: 0.0047 (ηp 2: 0.007; p: 0.37) | |
| Left temporal fusiform cortex, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: −0.012 (ηp 2: 3.1*10−4; p: 0.95) | BASSQ: 3.1*10−4 (ηp 2: 1.1*10−3; p: 0.73) | BASSQ: −7.4*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.073; p: 0.004) | |
| BSRS: −3.6*10−3 (ηp 2: 1.7*10−5; p: 0.97) | BSRS: −4.8*10−5 (ηp 2: 1.4*10−4; p: 0.9) | BSRS: −1.8*10−6 (ηp 2: 3.1*10−6; p: 0.99) | |
| BAge: 0.11 (ηp 2: 0.01; p: 0.29) | BAge: 4.3*10−4 (ηp 2: 7.6*10−3; p: 0.36) | BAge: −1.1*10−4 (ηp 2: 0.006; p: 0.41) | |
| Bviq: −0.094 (ηp 2: 6.4*10−3; p: 0.39) | Bviq: −2.3*10−4 (ηp 2: 2*10−3; p: 0.64) | Bviq: −4.3*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.076; p: 0.003) | |
| BGender: −8.2*10−3 (ηp 2: ∼0; p: 0.99) | BGender: 1.7*10−4 (ηp 2: 2*10−7; p: 0.99) | BGender: 1.3*10−3 (ηp 2: 1.2*10−3; p: 0.71) | |
| Right temporal fusiform cortex, posterior part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| BASSQ: 0.14 (ηp 2: 3.3*10−3; p: 0.54) | BASSQ: 8.9*10−4 (ηp 2: 5.6*10−3; p: 0.43) | BASSQ: −8.7*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.085; p: 0.002) | |
| BSRS: −0.076 (ηp 2: 5.3*10−3; p: 0.45) | BSRS: −3.4*10−4 (ηp 2: 4.5*10−3; p: 0.48) | BSRS: −6.8*10−6 (ηp 2: 3.1*10−5; p: 0.95) | |
| BAge: 0.043 (ηp 2: 1.1*10−3; p: 0.73) | BAge: 1.8*10−4 (ηp 2: 8.8*10−4; p: 0.76) | BAge: 5.9*10−5 (ηp 2: 1.6*10−3; p: 0.67) | |
| Bviq: −0.13 (ηp 2: 8.3*10−3; p: 0.34) | Bviq: −4.6*10−4 (ηp 2: 4.7*10−3; p: 0.47) | Bviq: −4.9*10−4 (ηp
2: 0.083; p: 0.002) | |
| BGender: 4.2 (ηp 2: 0.016; p: 0.18) | BGender: 0.016 (ηp 2: 0.01; p: 0.29) | BGender: 4*10−4 (ηp 2: 1.1*10−4; p: 0.91) |
We demonstrate the joint effects of Social Responsiveness Scale (Total Score) and Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire, controlling for age and gender and WASI Verbal IQ ( = viq).
: 0.01≤p<0.05.
: 0.001≤p<0.01.
: p<0.001.
: Significant interaction after false discovery rate correction with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
Connections of the right posterior cingulate gyrus in subjects with low and high degree of autistic traits.
| Group | Connected brain regions and averaged functional connectivity values (correlation coefficient) |
| Subjects with the highest ASSQ Total score (n = 52, cut-off value = 2) |
|
| Subjects with the lowest ASSQ Total score (n = 7, cut-off value = 24) |
|
Connection strengths are given as the wavelet correlation coefficients of the BOLD time curves. Cut-off threshold for lowest and highest ASSQ scorers were the 5th and 95th percentile values. Regions were listed in descending order of the connection strengths. Key for the abbreviations is given in Table S1.
Figure 7Functional network of the right posterior cingulate cortex, calculated for sub-populations with the lowest and highest ASSQ scores.
Graph edges were depicted based on the strongest functional connectivity (threshold criteria for averaged networks: wavelet correlation coefficient >0.634; 95th percentile strongest connection in high scorers; threshold criterion for the statistical parametric network (SPN) method: p<0.005). The nomenclature for brain region abbreviations is given in Table S1. Raw connectivity data are provided in Table 5. First row: averaged functional network (first degree connections) in subjects with the lowest ASSQ score (n = 52; 5th percentile, cut-off threshold: 2). Second row: lowest ASSQ scorer group, SPN based determination of connectivity strengths. Third row: averaged functional network in subjects with the highest ASSQ score (n = 7; 95th percentile, cut-off threshold: 24). Fourth row: high ASSQ scorer group, connections are visualized using SPN analysis.
Figure 8Demonstrating the functional connections of the right posterior cingulate cortex with a circular connectivity profile.
Connectivity data were calculated for sub-populations with the lowest and highest ASSQ scores. Key for the abbreviations is given in Table S1.
Figure 9Circular representation of the functional connections of the right posterior cingulate cortex, SPN method.
Connectivity data were calculated for sub-populations with the lowest and highest ASSQ scores. Key for the abbreviations is given in Table S1.