PURPOSE: Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is difficult, as symptoms vary greatly and are difficult to quantify objectively. Recent work has focused on the assessment of non-invasive diffusion tensor imaging-based biomarkers that reflect the microstructural characteristics of neuronal pathways in the brain. While tractography-based approaches typically analyze specific structures of interest, a graph-based large-scale network analysis of the connectome can yield comprehensive measures of larger-scale architectural patterns in the brain. Commonly applied global network indices, however, do not provide any specificity with respect to functional areas or anatomical structures. Aim of this work was to assess the concept of network centrality as a tool to perform locally specific analysis without disregarding the global network architecture and compare it to other popular network indices. METHODS: We create connectome networks from fiber tractographies and parcellations of the human brain and compute global network indices as well as local indices for Wernicke's Area, Broca's Area and the Motor Cortex. Our approach was evaluated on 18 children suffering from ASD and 18 typically developed controls using magnetic resonance imaging-based cortical parcellations in combination with diffusion tensor imaging tractography. RESULTS: We show that the network centrality of Wernicke's area is significantly (p<0.001) reduced in ASD, while the motor cortex, which was used as a control region, did not show significant alterations. This could reflect the reduced capacity for comprehension of language in ASD. CONCLUSIONS: The betweenness centrality could potentially be an important metric in the development of future diagnostic tools in the clinical context of ASD diagnosis. Our results further demonstrate the applicability of large-scale network analysis tools in the domain of region-specific analysis with a potential application in many different psychological disorders.
PURPOSE: Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is difficult, as symptoms vary greatly and are difficult to quantify objectively. Recent work has focused on the assessment of non-invasive diffusion tensor imaging-based biomarkers that reflect the microstructural characteristics of neuronal pathways in the brain. While tractography-based approaches typically analyze specific structures of interest, a graph-based large-scale network analysis of the connectome can yield comprehensive measures of larger-scale architectural patterns in the brain. Commonly applied global network indices, however, do not provide any specificity with respect to functional areas or anatomical structures. Aim of this work was to assess the concept of network centrality as a tool to perform locally specific analysis without disregarding the global network architecture and compare it to other popular network indices. METHODS: We create connectome networks from fiber tractographies and parcellations of the human brain and compute global network indices as well as local indices for Wernicke's Area, Broca's Area and the Motor Cortex. Our approach was evaluated on 18 children suffering from ASD and 18 typically developed controls using magnetic resonance imaging-based cortical parcellations in combination with diffusion tensor imaging tractography. RESULTS: We show that the network centrality of Wernicke's area is significantly (p<0.001) reduced in ASD, while the motor cortex, which was used as a control region, did not show significant alterations. This could reflect the reduced capacity for comprehension of language in ASD. CONCLUSIONS: The betweenness centrality could potentially be an important metric in the development of future diagnostic tools in the clinical context of ASD diagnosis. Our results further demonstrate the applicability of large-scale network analysis tools in the domain of region-specific analysis with a potential application in many different psychological disorders.
Authors: K H Fritzsche; P F Neher; I Reicht; T van Bruggen; C Goch; M Reisert; M Nolden; S Zelzer; H-P Meinzer; B Stieltjes Journal: Methods Inf Med Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Brian D Mills; Janie Lai; Timothy T Brown; Matthew Erhart; Eric Halgren; Judy Reilly; Anders Dale; Mark Appelbaum; Pamela Moses Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Ulrika Roine; Timo Roine; Juha Salmi; Taina Nieminen-Von Wendt; Sami Leppämäki; Pertti Rintahaka; Pekka Tani; Alexander Leemans; Mikko Sams Journal: Autism Res Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sophia Mueller; Daniel Keeser; Andrea C Samson; Valerie Kirsch; Janusch Blautzik; Michel Grothe; Okan Erat; Michael Hegenloh; Ute Coates; Maximilian F Reiser; Kristina Hennig-Fast; Thomas Meindl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dusan Hirjak; Philipp A Thomann; Robert C Wolf; Katharina M Kubera; Caspar Goch; Jan Hering; Klaus H Maier-Hein Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Ashok Panigrahy; Vincent J Schmithorst; Jessica L Wisnowski; Christopher G Watson; David C Bellinger; Jane W Newburger; Michael J Rivkin Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: P Reyes; M P Ortega-Merchan; A Rueda; F Uriza; Hernando Santamaria-García; N Rojas-Serrano; J Rodriguez-Santos; M C Velasco-Leon; J D Rodriguez-Parra; D E Mora-Diaz; D Matallana Journal: Behav Neurol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 3.342
Authors: Ulrika Roine; Timo Roine; Juha Salmi; Taina Nieminen-von Wendt; Pekka Tani; Sami Leppämäki; Pertti Rintahaka; Karen Caeyenberghs; Alexander Leemans; Mikko Sams Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 7.509
Authors: Felicitas Ehlen; Stefan Roepke; Fabian Klostermann; Irina Baskow; Pia Geise; Cyril Belica; Hannes Ole Tiedt; Behnoush Behnia Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2020-11