| Literature DB >> 23593301 |
Raymond Schuch1, Adam J Pelzek, Assaf Raz, Chad W Euler, Patricia A Ryan, Benjamin Y Winer, Andrew Farnsworth, Shyam S Bhaskaran, C Erec Stebbins, Yong Xu, Adrienne Clifford, David J Bearss, Hariprasad Vankayalapati, Allan R Goldberg, Vincent A Fischetti.
Abstract
We identified an essential cell wall biosynthetic enzyme in Bacillus anthracis and an inhibitor thereof to which the organism did not spontaneously evolve measurable resistance. This work is based on the exquisite binding specificity of bacteriophage-encoded cell wall-hydrolytic lysins, which have evolved to recognize critical receptors within the bacterial cell wall. Focusing on the B. anthracis-specific PlyG lysin, we first identified its unique cell wall receptor and cognate biosynthetic pathway. Within this pathway, one biosynthetic enzyme, 2-epimerase, was required for both PlyG receptor expression and bacterial growth. The 2-epimerase was used to design a small-molecule inhibitor, epimerox. Epimerox prevented growth of several Gram-positive pathogens and rescued mice challenged with lethal doses of B. anthracis. Importantly, resistance to epimerox was not detected (<10(-11) frequency) in B. anthracis and S. aureus. These results describe the use of phage lysins to identify promising lead molecules with reduced resistance potential for antimicrobial development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23593301 PMCID: PMC3622686 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Interaction of PlyG with B. anthracis NPS.
(A) Dose-dependent inhibition of PlyG lytic activity after pre-incubation with B. anthracis NPS. (B) PlyG activity after pre-incubation with increasing amounts of the CWG from Streptococcus pyogenes. (C) Dose-dependent inhibition of PlyGBD surface-binding after pre-incubation with B. anthracis NPS. (D) Deltavision images of surface-labeled B. anthracis with or without proteinase K treatment (+/−PK). NPS (green) was labeled with GFP-PlyGBD, and the S-layer Sap protein (red) was labeled with specific antibodies and an Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated secondary antibody. (E) Dot-blot analysis of PlyGBD binding to total cell wall material and both SDS-treated and HF-treated walls.
Figure 2Identification and analysis of 2-epimerase in B. anthracis.
(A) sps loci of the B. cereus lineage. Islands of variable sps genes are connected by gray regions and denoted by different colors. Conserved flanking sequences are shown. Red shaded loci (not in Ames) are cell wall-biosynthetic genes similar to that encoded by Ames. Inverted arrows are repeat elements. Susceptibility to PlyG lysis and GFP-PlyGBD surface binding are shown. For PlyG lysis, the “+++” designation is based on an assay [8] for zones of complete bacteriolysis on agar plates overlaid with the indicated organism and treated with a 10 µl drop of PBS containing 1 µg of PlyG; “++” indicates a slight reduction in activity compared to complete bacteriolysis, and “-“ indicates an absence of bacteriolysis. For PlyGBD binding, designations are based on exposure times needed to clearly visualize binding of GFP-PlyGBD to target organisms by fluorescence microscopy; “+++” indicates a <5 second exposure, “+” indicates a 15–30 second exposure, and “-“ indicates no fluorescence is observed. Abbreviations: w/c, whole-cell binding; p/s, polar/septal binding. (B) Genetic representation of 2-epimerase double mutant, RS1205. (C) Growth of RS1205 (with indicated IPTG concentrations) compared to the parental wild-type strain ΔSterne. Mean averages are shown (n = 3) with standard deviations. (D) Morphological analysis of RS1205 after five hours of growth without IPTG. Phase contrast images and corresponding fluorescence fields are shown for GFP-PlyGBD-labeled RS1205 (5 second exposure) and B. anthracis ΔSterne (30 second exposure). For Deltavision images, NPS (red) was labeled with rhodamine-PlyGBD, division septa (green) were labeled with vancomycin BODIPY FL, and DNA (blue) was labeled with DAPI. TEM images are shown with scale bars (500 nm) and arrows denote some division septa. (E) Phase contrast microscopic images of RS1205 grown for 12 hours with and without IPTG (5 µM).
Figure 3Antimicrobial activity of epimerox.
(A) Chemical structure of epimerox. (B) Growth curves of B. anthracis ΔSterne in BHI medium with and without epimerox. (C) Morphologies of B. anthracis and S. aureus after 5 hours of exposure to epimerox (5 µM and 14 µM, respectively). For Deltavision images, NPS (red) was labeled with rhodamine-PlyGBD, division septa (green) were labeled with vancomycin BODIPY FL, and DNA (blue) was labeled with DAPI. For TEM images, arrows indicate some division septa. Scale bars are shown. (D) Growth inhibition assays for Gram-positive and -negative organisms. Cultures were grown in BHI medium with and without indicated epimerox concentrations for 11 hours at 28°C. (E) Growth curves of S. aureus strain RN4220 in BHI medium with and without epimerox. (F) Survival plot of C57BL/6 mice after i.p. infection with 5×105 CFUs of B. anthracis Sterne, and i.p. treatment with buffer starting at 3 hours post-infection (and continuing every 6 hours for 7 days), or epimerox (13 mg/kg) starting at 3 hours or 24 hours post-infection (and continuing every 6 hours for 7 days).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for epimerox.
| Organism | MIC |
|
| 4.0 µg ml−1 (7.6 µM) |
|
| 4.0 µg ml−1 (7.6 µM) |
|
| 8.0 µg ml−1 (16.0 µM) |
MICs were determined in triplicate on three different days using a broth.
microdilution method; no variation was observed in MIC values.
Spontaneous antimicrobial resistance.
| Treatment | Organism | Frequency of resistance |
| rifampin (50 µg ml−1) |
| 3.0×10−9 |
|
| 7.7×10−7 | |
| daptomycin (15 µg ml−1) |
| 1.5×10−7 |
|
| 1.9×10−9 | |
| Epimerox |
| <8.3×10−11 |
|
| <4.5×10−11 |
Concentrated cultures were plated to agar with the indicated treatments.
B. anthracis Sterne and S. aureus RN4220 were used in this study.
Epimerox-resistant colonies were not observed in any experiment.