Literature DB >> 23592545

Adequate lymph node recovery improves survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Adedayo A Onitilo1, Rachel V Stankowski, Jessica M Engel, Suhail A R Doi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current recommendations suggest recovery of 12 lymph nodes during surgical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) for proper staging and prognostication. Adequate lymph node recovery has been associated with improved patient survival, with results inconsistent.
METHODS: We examined factors for association with adequate lymph node recovery and used findings to adjust survival analyses to clarify whether adequate lymph node examination is associated with CRC survival or associated with a subset of characteristics that biases lymph node recovery.
RESULTS: In 74% of subjects (1,036/1,397) an adequate number of lymph nodes was examined. A stepwise multivariate regression analysis showed procedure year, cancer stage, tumor size, and age at diagnosis were significantly associated with lymph node recovery. These and other factors associated with survival status were adjusted for in further analyses, revealing no difference in unadjusted overall survival by adequacy of lymph node recovery (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75-1.08, P = 0.239). However, in adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, adequate lymph node recovery was associated with reduced risk for death (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.89, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: The current recommendation for retrieval and examination of at least 12 lymph nodes is appropriate for proper treatment and prognostication in patients undergoing surgical resection for CRC.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592545      PMCID: PMC3810606          DOI: 10.1002/jso.23332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  29 in total

1.  The relationship of lymph node evaluation and colorectal cancer survival after curative resection: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Yukihide Kanemitsu; Koji Komori; Seiji Ishiguro; Toshiaki Watanabe; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Lymph node ratio as prognosis factor for colon cancer treated by colorectal surgeons.

Authors:  Carlos A Vaccaro; Victor Im; Gustavo L Rossi; Guillermo Ojea Quintana; Mario L Benati; Diego Perez de Arenaza; Fernando A Bonadeo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Lymph node harvest in colon cancer specimens depends on tumour factors, patients and doctors, but foremost on specimen handling.

Authors:  Kristian Storli; Christian Fredrik Lindboe; Camilla Kristoffersen; Karina Kleiven; Karl Søndenaa
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  Impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shingo Noura; Masayuki Ohue; Shingo Kano; Tatsushi Shingai; Terumasa Yamada; Isao Miyashiro; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Masahiko Yano; Osamu Ishikawa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-27

5.  Lymph node ratio as a quality and prognostic indicator in stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  Steven L Chen; Scott R Steele; John Eberhardt; Kangmin Zhu; Anton Bilchik; Alexander Stojadinovic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Lymph node retrieval from colorectal resection specimens for adenocarcinoma: is it worth the extra effort to find at least 12 nodes?

Authors:  L Fan; M Levy; C E Aguilar; R B Mertens; D Dhall; D P Frishberg; H L Wang
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 7.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  The optimal number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colorectal cancer and its impact of on outcomes.

Authors:  Hok Kwok Choi; Wai Lun Law; Jensen T C Poon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Colorectal carcinoma: selected issues in pathologic examination and staging and determination of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Mary Kay Washington
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Lymph node harvesting in colorectal carcinoma specimens.

Authors:  Emmanuel Lagoudianakis; Apostolos Pappas; Nikolaos Koronakis; Dimitrios Tsekouras; John Dallianoudis; Panagiota Kontogianni; Dimitrios Papanikolaou; John Chrysikos; George Karavitis; Haridimos Markogiannakis; Konstantinos Filis; Andreas Manouras
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb
View more
  9 in total

1.  Metastatic behaviour of sinonasal adenocarcinomas of the intestinal type (ITAC).

Authors:  K Donhuijsen; I Kollecker; P Petersen; N Gaßler; J Schulze; H-G Schroeder
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bochao Zhao; Wu Lv; Di Mei; Rui Luo; Shiyang Bao; Baojun Huang; Jie Lin
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Colorectal surgery in a rural setting.

Authors:  Giovanni Domenico Tebala
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-11-06

5.  Adequate lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer: a comparative analysis between open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Vilson Leite Batista; Antonio Carlos Ribeiro Garrido Iglesias; Fernando Athayde Veloso Madureira; Anke Bergmann; Rachel Perez Duarte; Bárbara Ferreira Saraiva da Fonseca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: determining factors and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Johannes Betge; Lars Harbaum; Marion J Pollheimer; Richard A Lindtner; Peter Kornprat; Matthias P Ebert; Cord Langner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Tattooing or Metallic Clip Placement? A Review of the Outcome Surrounding Preoperative Localization Methods in Minimally Invasive Anterior Resection Performed at a Single Center.

Authors:  Chang-Lin Lin; Chou-Pin Chen; Feng-Fan Chiang; Chou-Chen Chen; Ming-Cheng Chen; Chih-Tien Chen; Chun-Yu Lin; Hou-Hsuan Cheng; Yen-Chen Shao
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 1.719

8.  Factors affecting retrieval of 12 or more lymph nodes in pT1 colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Seung-Myoung Son; Chang Gok Woo; Ok-Jun Lee; Sang-Jeon Lee; Taek-Gu Lee; Ho-Chang Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Tumor sidedness influences prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery.

Authors:  Hsin-Wu Lai; James Cheng-Chung Wei; Hung-Chang Hung; Chun-Che Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.