Literature DB >> 26604632

Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.

Bruno Märkl1.   

Abstract

Lymph node staging is of crucial importance for the therapy stratification and prognosis estimation in colon cancer. Beside the detection of metastases, the number of harvested lymph nodes itself has prognostic relevance in stage II/III cancers. A stage migration effect caused by missed lymph node metastases has been postulated as most likely explanation for that. In order to avoid false negative node staging reporting of at least 12 lymph nodes is recommended. However, this threshold is met only in a minority of cases in daily practice. Due to quality initiatives the situation has improved in the past. This, however, had no influence on staging in several studies. While the numbers of evaluated lymph nodes increased continuously during the last decades the rate of node positive cases remained relatively constant. This fact together with other indications raised doubts that understaging is indeed the correct explanation for the prognostic impact of lymph node harvest. Several authors assume that immune response could play a major role in this context influencing both the lymph node detectability and the tumor's behavior. Further studies addressing this issue are need. Based on the findings the recommendations concerning minimal lymph node numbers and adjuvant chemotherapy should be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Immune response; Lymph node harvest; Stage migration; Understaging; Will Rogers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26604632      PMCID: PMC4649108          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  163 in total

1.  Lymph node correlations and thresholds in colorectal cancer specimens.

Authors:  Jatinder S Minhas; Laszlo Igali
Journal:  Int J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 1.271

2.  Time-dependent trends in lymph node yield and impact on adjuvant therapy decisions in colon cancer surgery: an international multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Aviram Nissan; Zev Wainberg; Perry Shen; Martin McCarter; Mladjan Protic; Robin S Howard; Scott R Steele; George E Peoples; Anton Bilchik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Upstaging of early colorectal cancers following improved lymph node yield after methylene blue injection.

Authors:  Rikke Karlin Jepsen; Peter Ingeholm; Eva Løbner Lund
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Factors affecting lymph node yield from patients undergoing colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Zubin M Bamboat; Danielle Deperalta; Abdulmetin Dursun; David L Berger; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years.

Authors:  Helen M Parsons; Todd M Tuttle; Karen M Kuntz; James W Begun; Patricia M McGovern; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Improved lymph node harvest from resected colon cancer specimens did not cause upstaging from TNM stage II to III.

Authors:  Kristian Storli; Karl Søndenaa; Bjørg Furnes; Sabine Leh; Idunn Nesvik; Tore Bru; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ida Bukholm; Solveig Norheim-Andersen; Geir Eide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Lymph node retrieval from colorectal resection specimens for adenocarcinoma: is it worth the extra effort to find at least 12 nodes?

Authors:  L Fan; M Levy; C E Aguilar; R B Mertens; D Dhall; D P Frishberg; H L Wang
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Clinicopathologic factors associated with lymph node retrieval in resectable colon cancer: a Veterans' Affairs Central Cancer Registry (VACCR) database analysis.

Authors:  Wilson I Gonsalves; Swapna Kanuri; Tsewang Tashi; Ibrahim Aldoss; Ashwin Sama; Islam Al-Howaidi; Ashwin Ganta; Mudappa Kalaiah; Ramya Thota; Jairam Krishnamurthy; Xiang Fang; Peter Townley; Apar K Ganti; Shanmuga Subbiah; Peter T Silberstein
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Challenging the feasibility and clinical significance of current guidelines on lymph node examination in rectal cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Anand Govindarajan; Mithat Gönen; Martin R Weiser; Jinru Shia; Larissa K Temple; Jose G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Which is the most suitable classification for colorectal cancer, log odds, the number or the ratio of positive lymph nodes?

Authors:  Yong-Xi Song; Peng Gao; Zhen-Ning Wang; Lin-Lin Tong; Ying-Ying Xu; Zhe Sun; Cheng-Zhong Xing; Hui-Mian Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  22 in total

1.  The relation between oncologic outcomes and metastatic lymph node location following laparoscopic resection of stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  Han Deok Kwak; Jae Kyun Ju; Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Number of Natural Killer Cells in the Largest Diameter Lymph Nodes Is Associated with the Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes and Lymph Node Size, and Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Kazutake Okada; Sotaro Sadahiro; Lin Fung Chan; Takashi Ogimi; Hiroshi Miyakita; Gota Saito; Akira Tanaka; Toshiyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.935

3.  Lymph node retrieval after dissolution of surrounding adipose tissue for pathological examination of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiromichi Maeda; Ken Okamoto; Koji Oba; Mai Shiga; Yuki Fujieda; Tsutomu Namikawa; Makoto Hiroi; Ichiro Murakami; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Michiya Kobayashi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Nomogram predicting cancer-specific mortality in early-onset rectal cancer: a competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Yufeng Wang; Jiayuan Wu; Hairong He; Huan Ma; Liren Hu; Jiyu Wen; Jun Lyu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Metastasis to lymph nodes around the vascular tie worsens long-term oncological outcomes following complete mesocolic excision and conventional colectomy for right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Serkan Zenger; Erman Aytac; Bulent Gurbuz; Volkan Ozben; Emre Ozoran; Bilgi Baca; Emre Balik; Ismail Hamzaoglu; Tayfun Karahasanoglu; Dursun Bugra
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Population-based study to re-evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer.

Authors:  J C Del Paggio; Y Peng; X Wei; S Nanji; P H MacDonald; C Krishnan Nair; C M Booth
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Immunologic Biomarkers and Biomarkers for Immunotherapies in Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Authors:  Benedikt Martin; Bruno Märkl
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  Circulating Lymphocytes Reflect the Local Immune Response in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Johanna Waidhauser; Pia Nerlinger; Florian Sommer; Sebastian Wolf; Stefan Eser; Phillip Löhr; Andreas Rank; Bruno Märkl
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07

9.  Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shimpei Ogawa; Michio Itabashi; Yoshiko Bamba; Kimitaka Tani; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yamauchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Marc J Gollub; Gina Brown
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.