Literature DB >> 21208280

Lymph node harvest in colon cancer specimens depends on tumour factors, patients and doctors, but foremost on specimen handling.

Kristian Storli1, Christian Fredrik Lindboe, Camilla Kristoffersen, Karina Kleiven, Karl Søndenaa.   

Abstract

There are good indications that the number of lymph nodes found in the specimen after resections for colon cancer somehow has a bearing on prognosis. Many factors have been reported in the literature to influence lymph node retrieval. We wanted to assess these closer with special focus on the pathology handling process in our own practice. A range of international literature was reviewed to study what has been found to influence lymph node harvest. A questionnaire was sent to 13 renowned national and international institutions to explore their handling of the colon cancer specimens to obtain a histological diagnosis. A retrospective, hospital audit was undertaken to examine if the number of lymph nodes and staging after examinations of the specimens varied between individual pathologists. In the literature, tumour and patient characteristics, as well as the surgeon and the pathologist, are found to be influential, but it is difficult to ascertain which ones are truly essential. Fat solvents were found by several to increase the lymph node yield, although some also opposed this finding. Our questionnaire showed some variations in the routines of each Department. A junior pathologist was more likely to inspect the specimen first hand and not more than half employed specific lymph node detection strategies while three of 13 did not seek a minimum number of lymph nodes. Still every department had implemented a standard procedure for such examinations. The internal audit showed without doubt that the devotion of the pathologist secured significantly more lymph nodes from the specimen and this may also have detected more stage III cancers. Several tumour and individual patient characteristics, surgical approach and specimen handling may influence lymph node yield and theoretically, TNM staging. Our investigation specifically suggests that tissue handling by pathologists may be a prominent factor in lymph node harvest from colon cancer specimens.
© 2010 The Authors. APMIS © 2010 APMIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21208280     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02702.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  13 in total

1.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is crucial.

Authors:  Hermann Kessler; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Factors affecting lymph node yield from patients undergoing colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Zubin M Bamboat; Danielle Deperalta; Abdulmetin Dursun; David L Berger; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Short term results of complete (D3) vs. standard (D2) mesenteric excision in colon cancer shows improved outcome of complete mesenteric excision in patients with TNM stages I-II.

Authors:  K E Storli; K Søndenaa; B Furnes; I Nesvik; E Gudlaugsson; I Bukholm; G E Eide
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Predictors of lymph node count in colorectal cancer resections: data from US nationwide prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Noriko Tanaka; Aya Kuchiba; Katsuhiko Nosho; Mai Yamauchi; Jason L Hornick; Richard S Swanson; Andrew T Chan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Curtis Huttenhower; Deborah Schrag; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

5.  A natural orifice transrectal approach for oncologic resection of the rectosigmoid: an experimental study and comparison with conventional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Erwin Rieder; Georg O Spaun; Yash S Khajanchee; Danny V Martinec; Brittany N Arnold; Ann E Smith Sehdev; Lee L Swanstrom; Mark H Whiteford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Improved lymph node harvest from resected colon cancer specimens did not cause upstaging from TNM stage II to III.

Authors:  Kristian Storli; Karl Søndenaa; Bjørg Furnes; Sabine Leh; Idunn Nesvik; Tore Bru; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ida Bukholm; Solveig Norheim-Andersen; Geir Eide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  How many lymph nodes are enough? Assessing the adequacy of lymph node yield for staging in favorable histology wilms tumor.

Authors:  Amanda F Saltzman; Derek E Smith; Dexiang Gao; Debashis Ghosh; Arya Amini; Jennifer H Aldrink; Roshni Dasgupta; Kenneth W Gow; Richard D Glick; Peter F Ehrlich; Nicholas G Cost
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Adequate lymph node recovery improves survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Rachel V Stankowski; Jessica M Engel; Suhail A R Doi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Small bowel carcinoid: Location isn't everything!

Authors:  Danielle M Hari; Stephanie L Goff; Heidi J Reich; Anna M Leung; Myung-Shin Sim; Ji Hey Lee; Edward Wolin; Farin Amersi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-27

10.  The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery : proceedings of a consensus conference.

Authors:  K Søndenaa; P Quirke; W Hohenberger; K Sugihara; H Kobayashi; H Kessler; G Brown; V Tudyka; A D'Hoore; R H Kennedy; N P West; S H Kim; R Heald; K E Storli; A Nesbakken; B Moran
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.