| Literature DB >> 23592260 |
Cindy M Liu1, Bruce A Hungate, Aaron A R Tobian, David Serwadda, Jacques Ravel, Richard Lester, Godfrey Kigozi, Maliha Aziz, Ronald M Galiwango, Fred Nalugoda, Tania L Contente-Cuomo, Maria J Wawer, Paul Keim, Ronald H Gray, Lance B Price.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Male circumcision reduces female-to-male HIV transmission. Hypothesized mechanisms for this protective effect include decreased HIV target cell recruitment and activation due to changes in the penis microbiome. We compared the coronal sulcus microbiota of men from a group of uncircumcised controls (n = 77) and from a circumcised intervention group (n = 79) at enrollment and year 1 follow-up in a randomized circumcision trial in Rakai, Uganda. We characterized microbiota using16S rRNA gene-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) and pyrosequencing, log response ratio (LRR), Bayesian classification, nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS), and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PerMANOVA). At baseline, men in both study arms had comparable coronal sulcus microbiota; however, by year 1, circumcision decreased the total bacterial load and reduced microbiota biodiversity. Specifically, the prevalence and absolute abundance of 12 anaerobic bacterial taxa decreased significantly in the circumcised men. While aerobic bacterial taxa also increased postcircumcision, these gains were minor. The reduction in anaerobes may partly account for the effects of circumcision on reduced HIV acquisition. IMPORTANCE: The bacterial changes identified in this study may play an important role in the HIV risk reduction conferred by male circumcision. Decreasing the load of specific anaerobes could reduce HIV target cell recruitment to the foreskin. Understanding the mechanisms that underlie the benefits of male circumcision could help to identify new intervention strategies for decreasing HIV transmission, applicable to populations with high HIV prevalence where male circumcision is culturally less acceptable.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23592260 PMCID: PMC3634604 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00076-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
Demographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, and symptoms of sexually transmitted infections for the control and intervention arms at enrollment
| Characteristic | No. (%) in group | |
|---|---|---|
| Control ( | Intervention ( | |
| Age (yr) | ||
| 15–19 | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) |
| 20–24 | 13 (16.9) | 15 (19.0) |
| 25–29 | 21 (27.3) | 25 (31.6) |
| 30–49 | 42 (54.5) | 38 (48.1) |
| Marital status | ||
| Currently married, monogamous | 70 (91.0) | 71 (89.9) |
| Currently married, polygamous | 7 (9.0) | 8 (10.1) |
| No. of sexual partners in past yr | ||
| 1 | 45 (58.4) | 45 (57.0) |
| 2 | 23 (29.9) | 26 (32.9) |
| ≥3 | 9 (11.7) | 8 (10.1) |
| Nonmarital sexual relationships | ||
| No | 66 (85.7) | 67 (84.8) |
| Yes | 11 (14.3) | 12 (15.2) |
| Condom use in past yr | ||
| None | 46 (59.7) | 54 (68.3) |
| Inconsistent use | 30 (39.0) | 24 (30.4) |
| Consistent use | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) |
| Syphilis infection | ||
| No | 72 (93.5) | 73 (92.4) |
| Yes | 4 (5.2) | 5 (6.3) |
| Not tested | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) |
| HSV-2 infection | ||
| No | 36 (46.8) | 37 (46.8) |
| Yes | 32 (41.5) | 32 (40.5) |
| Indeterminate | 9 (11.5) | 9 (11.4) |
| Not tested | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) |
| Self-reported symptoms of sexually transmitted infection | ||
| Genital ulcer disease | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Urethral discharge | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) |
| Dysuria | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Prevalences and proportional abundances of the 40 most common coronal sulcus bacteria in the control and intervention arms at enrollment[]
| Family | Genus | Prevalence (%) in group | Avg proportional abundance [% (SD)] in group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | Intervention ( | Control | Intervention | ||
| 74 (96.1) | 72 (91.1) | 5.4 (5.9) | 5.1 (5.8) | ||
| 71 (92.2) | 68 (86.1) | 5.1 (8.1) | 4.3 (6.2) | ||
| NA | Unclassified | 69 (89.6) | 70 (88.6) | 15.9 (16.0) | 14.3 (14.5) |
| 69 (89.6) | 67 (84.8) | 21.4 (17.0) | 23.1 (20.5) | ||
| 63 (81.8) | 64 (81.0) | 6.5 (8.3) | 7.1 (10.6) | ||
| 62 (80.5) | 58 (73.4) | 3.2 (4.7) | 5.2 (8.6) | ||
| 61 (79.2) | 55 (69.6) | 5.4 (6.1) | 4.8 (8.4) | ||
| 57 (74.0) | 52 (65.8) | 12.2 (21.2) | 8.5 (18.8) | ||
| Unclassified | 54 (70.1) | 53 (67.1) | 0.7 (0.8) | 0.8 (1.5) | |
| 53 (68.8) | 43 (54.4) | 1.6 (1.9) | 1.0 (1.6) | ||
| 40 (51.9) | 36 (45.6) | 1.0 (2.4) | 0.8 (1.8) | ||
| 31 (40.3) | 36 (45.6) | 0.9 (2.1) | 1.3 (2.7) | ||
| 38 (49.4) | 26 (32.9) | 1.5 (5.2) | 1.1 (3.8) | ||
| 33 (42.9) | 25 (31.6) | 1.8 (5.9) | 0.9 (3.2) | ||
| 26 (33.8) | 28 (35.4) | 2.4 (10.7) | 8 (21.0) | ||
| 29 (37.7) | 21 (26.6) | 1.4 (3.9) | 1.1 (6.0) | ||
| 28 (36.4) | 21 (26.6) | 0.3 (0.6) | 0.5 (1.9) | ||
| 26 (33.8) | 19 (24.1) | 1.3 (6.1) | 0.5 (2.8) | ||
| 26 (33.8) | 17 (21.5) | 0.1 (0.5) | 0.1 (0.2) | ||
| 26 (33.8) | 14 (17.7) | 0.5 (1.5) | 0.6 (3.1) | ||
| 25 (32.5) | 14 (17.7) | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.04 (0.1) | ||
| 20 (26.0) | 19 (24.1) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.1 (0.2) | ||
| 23 (29.9) | 14 (17.7) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.1 (0.2) | ||
| 19 (24.7) | 9 (11.4) | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.03 (0.1) | ||
| 17 (22.1) | 10 (12.7) | 0.2 (0.5) | 0.3 (1.2) | ||
| 14 (18.2) | 12 (15.2) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.2 (1.1) | ||
| 13 (16.9) | 13 (16.5) | 0.2 (0.8) | 0.3 (1.4) | ||
| 13 (16.9) | 12 (15.2) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.03 (0.1) | ||
| 14 (18.2) | 7 (8.9) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.03 (0.1) | ||
| 12 (15.6) | 9 (11.4) | 0.1 (0.5) | 0.03 (0.1) | ||
| 10 (13.0) | 11 (13.9) | 0.2 (0.6) | 0.2 (0.5) | ||
| 8 (10.4) | 13 (16.5) | 0.2 (0.8) | 0.8 (3.8) | ||
| 13 (16.9) | 7 (8.9) | 0.2 (0.8) | 0.2 (0.8) | ||
| 12 (15.6) | 8 (10.1) | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.1 (0.5) | ||
| 9 (11.7) | 11 (13.9) | 0.02 (0.1) | 0.1 (0.2) | ||
| 10 (13.0) | 8 (10.1) | 0.05 (0.2) | 0.1 (0.2) | ||
| 10 (13.0) | 8 (10.1) | 0.2 (0.6) | 0.1 (0.4) | ||
| 8 (10.4) | 10 (12.7) | 0.04 (0.2) | 0.04 (0.1) | ||
| 10 (13.0) | 6 (7.6) | 0.04 (0.1) | 0.03 (0.1) | ||
| 13 (16.9) | 2 (2.5) | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.01 (0.1) | ||
*, false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted P value < 0.05.
FIG 1 Changes in the coronal sulcus bacterial load as measured by the log response ratio for the uncircumcised (Contr.; in red) versus the circumcised (Interv.; in orange) men, shown by group (top panel) and by individual (bottom panel). In the group comparison, the box of each box plot denotes the interquartile range (IQR) (quartile 1 [Q1] to Q3) and the corresponding median, whereas the whiskers signify the upper and lower 1.5× IQR. Outliers are shown as open symbols in each box plot. There was a statistically significant reduction in bacterial load for the circumcised men compared to that for the uncircumcised men (P = 0.048). As shown in the scatter plot in the bottom panel, although a decrease was observed for many individuals from both groups, more circumcised men showed decreases (i.e., negative log response ratios) (62/79, 78.5%) than did those that remained uncircumcised (51/77, 66.2%).
Prevalences and changes in prevalence of the 40 most common coronal sulcus bacteria for uncircumcised and circumcised men at year 1
| Bacterial group | Oxygen tolerance[ | Prevalence (%) | ΔΔPrevalence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncircumcised | Circumcised | |||
| AN | 71 (92.2) | 37 (46.8)** | −40.41 | |
| AN | 71 (92.2) | 59 (74.7) | −11.39 | |
| Unclassified | NA | 65 (84.4) | 38 (48.1)** | −35.31 |
| AN | 70 (90.9) | 41 (51.9)** | −34.21 | |
| AN | 61 (79.2) | 38 (48.1)** | −30.31 | |
| AN | 51 (66.2) | 12 (15.2)** | −43.94 | |
| AN | 62 (80.5) | 23 (29.1)** | −43.10 | |
| FAN | 71 (92.2) | 77 (97.5)** | 13.46 | |
| Unclassified | NA | 55 (71.4) | 20 (25.3)** | −43.07 |
| AN | 47 (61.0) | 13 (16.5)** | −30.18 | |
| AN | 35 (45.5) | 8 (10.1)** | −28.95 | |
| AN | 32 (41.6) | 13 (16.5)* | −30.41 | |
| AN | 31 (40.3) | 8 (10.1)* | −13.69 | |
| FAN | 34 (44.2) | 32 (40.5) | 7.56 | |
| FAN/AN/MAE | 32 (41.6) | 35 (44.3) | 1.07 | |
| FAN | 48 (62.3)* | 69 (87.3)** | 36.08 | |
| AN | 21 (27.3) | 10 (12.7) | −4.83 | |
| FAN | 34 (44.2) | 28 (35.4) | 1.00 | |
| FAN | 27 (35.1) | 8 (10.1) | −12.69 | |
| AN | 26 (33.8) | 16 (20.3) | 2.53 | |
| AN | 14 (18.2) | 7 (8.9) | 5.42 | |
| AN | 19 (24.7) | 5 (6.3) | −16.42 | |
| FAN | 15 (19.5) | 4 (5.1) | −2.27 | |
| AN | 18 (23.4) | 5 (6.3) | −3.76 | |
| AN | 13 (16.9) | 12 (15.2) | 7.73 | |
| AN | 18 (23.4) | 11 (13.9) | −6.46 | |
| AN | 15 (19.5) | 9 (11.4) | −7.66 | |
| AN | 15 (19.5) | 2 (2.5)* | 15.26 | |
| AN | 11 (14.3) | 4 (5.1) | 0.10 | |
| NA | 4 (5.2) | 1 (1.3) | 0.26 | |
| AN | 8 (10.4) | 4 (5.1) | −6.26 | |
| AN | 17 (22.1) | 11 (13.9) | −14.22 | |
| AN | 7 (9.1) | 3 (3.8) | 2.73 | |
| FAN | 17 (22.1) | 21 (26.6) | 9.96 | |
| AN | 9 (11.7) | 7 (8.9) | −5.06 | |
| AE | 20 (26.0) | 36 (45.6)** | 22.46 | |
| AN | 11 (14.3) | 10 (12.7) | 1.23 | |
| AE | 22 (28.6) | 39.24 | 8.40 | |
| FAN | 15 (19.5) | 13 (16.5) | 2.37 | |
| AE | 16 (20.8) | 2 (2.5) | −3.90 | |
AN, strictly anaerobic; AE strictly aerobic; FAN, facultative anaerobic; MAE, microaerophilic; NA, no data.
**, FDR-adjusted P value < 0.0001 for change in prevalence over time (i.e., ΔPrevalence); *, FDR-adjusted P value < 0.05 for ΔPrevalence.
ΔΔPrevalence, shown as a percentile, is the change in prevalence seen for the circumcised men over time compared to that for men that remain uncircumcised.
FIG 2 The nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) ordination plots enable the visualization of individuals’ microbiota over time. In nMDS plots, each data point represents an individual’s microbiota at one time point. The centroids and 95% confidence ellipses for each study group are as shown. Here, the coronal sulcus microbiota in men that remained uncircumcised showed minor variations from enrollment (in blue) to year-1 (in orange) (Fig. 2A). In contrast, significant shifts were seen in the circumcised men (Fig. 2B).
Effect size of MC, measured as the change in absolute abundances of coronal sulcus bacteria that significantly decreased (i.e., “negative responders”) or increased (i.e., “positive responders”) post-MC, adjusted by changes in abundance among uncircumcised men over time[]
| Category and bacterial group[ | Indicator value (FDR-adjusted | MC effect size [mean (90% CI)] |
|---|---|---|
| Negative responders to MC | ||
| | 0.18 (0.06) | −25,327 (−48,812 to −3,988) |
| | 0.27 (<0.01) | −14,232 (−28,698 to −2,358) |
| Unclassified | 0.24 (0.01) | −10,087 (−32,278 to 12,802) |
| Unclassified | 0.22 (0.03) | −3,299 (−8,715 to 647) |
| | 0.30 (<0.01) | −3,207 (−10,314 to 5,319) |
| | 0.29 (<0.01) | −1,349 (−8,121 to 5,388) |
| | 0.24 (0.07) | −1,343 (−2,385 to −438) |
| | 0.27 (0.03) | −1,284 (−2,292 to −337) |
| | 0.21 (<0.01) | −1,157 (−2,415 to −188) |
| | 0.16 (0.02) | −568 (−1,480 to 290) |
| | 0.20 (0.01) | −286 (−780 to 13) |
| | 0.16 (0.03) | −281 (−1,545 to 1,032) |
| | 0.28 (<0.01) | −244 (−785 to 321) |
| | 0.13 (0.01) | −110 (−258 to 12) |
| | 0.14 (0.01) | −44 (−175 to 75) |
| | 0.17 (0.01) | −37 (−270 to 171) |
| | 0.14 (0.01) | 0 (0 to 1) |
| | 0.24 (<0.01) | 1,434 (−1,259 to 4,618) |
| Positive responders to MC | ||
| | 0.12 (<0.01) | 1 (0 to 2) |
| | 0.11 (0.04) | 1 (0 to 2) |
| | 0.32 (<0.01) | 8 (5 to 11) |
| | 0.30 (<0.01) | 13 (5 to 22) |
| | 0.26 (0.06) | 45 (8 to 94) |
| | 0.16 (<0.01) | 101 (−7 to 243) |
| | 0.21 (0.02) | 161 (22 to 345) |
| | 0.56 (<0.01) | 259 (168 to 353) |
| | 0.50 (<0.01) | 2,857 (1,440 to 4,722) |
The negative and positive responders to MC were identified using indicator analysis, which also produced the indicator values.
*, significant change in prevalence only; **, significant change in absolute abundance (i.e., load) only; ***, significant change in both prevalence and absolute abundance.