Literature DB >> 2359149

Anticipation in squash: differences in advance cue utilization between expert and novice players.

B Abernethy1.   

Abstract

The time of occurrence and spatial location of the advance cues used to anticipate the direction and force of an opponent's stroke in squash were examined using a film task. This task, designed to stimulate the normal perceptual display of the defensive player, consisted of two discrete parts, each containing 160 individual stroke sequences (trials). In the first part of the film task, the display was occluded at different time intervals throughout the development of the opponent's stroke and the 16 expert and 20 novice subjects had to predict both the direction (down-wall or cross-court) and force (drive or drop shot) of the opponent's stroke. In the second part of the film task, visibility to selected advance cues was occluded by placing opaque mats on the film surface. Across all of the film task conditions experts were superior to novices in predicting the event outcome from the information available, highlighting the important contribution anticipatory skills make to expert performance in this sport. Analysis of lateral (direction) error showed that the most critical time periods for extracting information about stroke direction are the periods between 160-80 ms prior to racket-ball contact and the period of extended ball flight arising at least 80 ms after contact. Whereas both groups were attuned to this ball flight information, only the experts were capable of picking up information from the early part of the opponent's actions. This early information appeared to be provided by the opposing player's arm action. Similar time periods were found to be also important for the prediction of stroke depth, but in this case both experts and novices were similar in their cue dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2359149     DOI: 10.1080/02640419008732128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  31 in total

1.  Clocking perceptual processing speed: From chance to 75% correct in less than 30 milliseconds.

Authors:  Terrence R Stanford; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Statistical modelling of gaze behaviour as categorical time series: what you should watch to save soccer penalties.

Authors:  C Button; M Dicks; R Haines; R Barker; K Davids
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-12-08

3.  The time course of amplitude specification in brief interceptive actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Annaliese Plooy; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions.

Authors:  Lincoln J Colling; William F Thompson; John Sutton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Searching for the minimal essential information for skilled perception and action.

Authors:  B Abernethy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

6.  Tracking the temporal evolution of a perceptual judgment using a compelled-response task.

Authors:  Swetha Shankar; Dino P Massoglia; Dantong Zhu; M Gabriela Costello; Terrence R Stanford; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Waiting is the Hardest Part: Comparison of Two Computational Strategies for Performing a Compelled-Response Task.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Swetha Shankar; M Gabriela Costello; Dantong Zhu; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Essential kinematic information, athletic experience, and affordance perception for others.

Authors:  Julie A Weast; Ashley Walton; Braylen C Chandler; Kevin Shockley; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

9.  When less is more: reduced usefulness training for the learning of anticipation skill in tennis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Smeeton; Raoul Huys; David M Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Active prospective control is required for effective sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Elizabeth Casserly; Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.