Literature DB >> 20714416

Clocking perceptual processing speed: From chance to 75% correct in less than 30 milliseconds.

Terrence R Stanford1, Emilio Salinas.   

Abstract

THE NEURAL BASIS OF CHOICE BEHAVIOR HAS BEEN INTENSELY STUDIED WITH LABORATORY TASKS IN WHICH A SUBJECT SEES A STIMULUS AND MAKES A CORRESPONDING MOTOR RESPONSE, BUT THE ISSUE OF TIMING HAS BEEN HARD TO TACKLE: How much time is necessary to make the perceptual judgment versus executing the motor report? When and how does a subject commit to a particular choice, and what neural mechanisms determine that? A major limitation has been that reaction times (RTs) are affected by sensory and motor factors (e.g., task difficulty, urgency, expectation) that can be covertly traded. Recently, we designed a task that overcomes these problems and allows us to construct a new curve that unambiguously reveals how a subject's perceptual judgment unfolds in time. Specifically, the slope of this "tachometric" curve depends on the perceptual difficulty of the task and the perceptual capacity of the subject, but not on motor execution. This technique shows that monkeys can make accurate color discriminations in less than 30 ms. More importantly, it provides a novel metric for correlating the time courses of pyschophysical and neuronal responses, opening up a new avenue for investigating choice behaviors in a wide variety of experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choice; color; discrimination; mental chronometry; monkey; perception; psychophysics; race to threshold; reaction time; saccade

Year:  2010        PMID: 20714416      PMCID: PMC2918779          DOI: 10.4161/cib.3.3.11707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Integr Biol        ISSN: 1942-0889


  27 in total

1.  The influence of urgency on decision time.

Authors:  B A Reddi; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT.

Authors:  J V Dodd; K Krug; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision.

Authors:  John Palmer; Alexander C Huk; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Kong-Fatt Wong; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal resolution for the perception of features and conjunctions.

Authors:  Clara Bodelón; Mazyar Fallah; John H Reynolds
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Neural control of voluntary movement initiation.

Authors:  D P Hanes; J D Schall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Perceptual decision making in less than 30 milliseconds.

Authors:  Terrence R Stanford; Swetha Shankar; Dino P Massoglia; M Gabriela Costello; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.