Literature DB >> 23589891

Phosphoregulation promotes release of kinetochores from dynamic microtubules via multiple mechanisms.

Krishna K Sarangapani1, Bungo Akiyoshi, Nicole M Duggan, Sue Biggins, Charles L Asbury.   

Abstract

During mitosis, multiprotein complexes called kinetochores orchestrate chromosome segregation by forming load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips, and by participating in phosphoregulatory error correction. The conserved kinase Aurora B phosphorylates the major microtubule-binding kinetochore subcomplexes, Ndc80 and (in yeast) Dam1, to promote release of erroneous attachments, giving another chance for proper attachments to form. It is unknown whether Aurora B phosphorylation promotes release directly, by increasing the rate of kinetochore detachment, or indirectly, by destabilizing the microtubule tip. Moreover, the relative importance of phosphorylation of Ndc80 vs. Dam1 in the context of whole kinetochores is unclear. To address these uncertainties, we isolated native yeast kinetochore particles carrying phosphomimetic mutations on Ndc80 and Dam1, and applied advanced laser-trapping techniques to measure the strength and stability of their attachments to individual dynamic microtubule tips. Rupture forces were reduced by phosphomimetic mutations on both subcomplexes, in an additive manner, indicating that both subcomplexes make independent contributions to attachment strength. Phosphomimetics on either subcomplex reduced attachment lifetimes under constant force, primarily by accelerating detachment during microtubule growth. Phosphomimetics on Dam1 also increased the likelihood of switches from microtubule growth into shortening, further promoting release in an indirect manner. Taken together, our results suggest that, in vivo, Aurora B releases kinetochores via at least two mechanisms: by weakening the kinetochore-microtubule interface and also by destabilizing the kinetochore-attached microtubule tip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589891      PMCID: PMC3645574          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220700110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface.

Authors:  Julie P I Welburn; Mathijs Vleugel; Dan Liu; John R Yates; Michael A Lampson; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Analysis of Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation of the Ndc80 kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Christian R Nelson; Jeffrey A Ranish; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Fibrils connect microtubule tips with kinetochores: a mechanism to couple tubulin dynamics to chromosome motion.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; Mary K Morphew; Artem K Efremov; Kirill Zhudenkov; Vladimir A Volkov; Iain M Cheeseman; Arshad Desai; David N Mastronarde; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex.

Authors:  Fabienne Lampert; Peter Hornung; Stefan Westermann
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B.

Authors:  Jerry F Tien; Neil T Umbreit; Daniel R Gestaut; Andrew D Franck; Jeremy Cooper; Linda Wordeman; Tamir Gonen; Charles L Asbury; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 6.  Direct physical study of kinetochore-microtubule interactions by reconstitution and interrogation with an optical force clamp.

Authors:  Andrew D Franck; Andrew F Powers; Daniel R Gestaut; Trisha N Davis; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion.

Authors:  Andrew F Powers; Andrew D Franck; Daniel R Gestaut; Jeremy Cooper; Beth Gracyzk; Ronnie R Wei; Linda Wordeman; Trisha N Davis; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Aurora B kinase.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Michael A Lampson
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.407

9.  Kinetochore attachments require an interaction between unstructured tails on microtubules and Ndc80(Hec1).

Authors:  Stephanie A Miller; Michael L Johnson; P Todd Stukenberg
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Ipl1-dependent phosphorylation of Dam1 is reduced by tension applied on kinetochores.

Authors:  Patrick Keating; Najma Rachidi; Tomoyuki U Tanaka; Michael J R Stark
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  45 in total

1.  Minimal model for collective kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Edward J Banigan; Kevin K Chiou; Edward R Ballister; Alyssa M Mayo; Michael A Lampson; Andrea J Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mps1 Regulates Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment Stability via the Ska Complex to Ensure Error-Free Chromosome Segregation.

Authors:  John Maciejowski; Hauke Drechsler; Kathrin Grundner-Culemann; Edward R Ballister; Jose-Antonio Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Veronica Rodriguez-Bravo; Mathew J K Jones; Emily Foley; Michael A Lampson; Henrik Daub; Andrew D McAinsh; Prasad V Jallepalli
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  Catch and release: how do kinetochores hook the right microtubules during mitosis?

Authors:  Krishna K Sarangapani; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Measuring kinetochore-microtubule interaction in vitro.

Authors:  Jonathan W Driver; Andrew F Powers; Krishna K Sarangapani; Sue Biggins; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Data Analysis for Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2016-05-02

7.  Regulation of outer kinetochore Ndc80 complex-based microtubule attachments by the central kinetochore Mis12/MIND complex.

Authors:  Emily M Kudalkar; Emily A Scarborough; Neil T Umbreit; Alex Zelter; Daniel R Gestaut; Michael Riffle; Richard S Johnson; Michael J MacCoss; Charles L Asbury; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Simultaneous Manipulation and Super-Resolution Fluorescence Imaging of Individual Kinetochores Coupled to Microtubule Tips.

Authors:  Yi Deng; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

Review 9.  Linked in: formation and regulation of microtubule attachments during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 10.  "Uno, nessuno e centomila": the different faces of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Francesca Malvezzi; Stefan Westermann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.