Literature DB >> 20096784

Direct physical study of kinetochore-microtubule interactions by reconstitution and interrogation with an optical force clamp.

Andrew D Franck1, Andrew F Powers, Daniel R Gestaut, Trisha N Davis, Charles L Asbury.   

Abstract

We detail our use of computer-controlled optical traps to study interactions between kinetochore components and dynamic microtubules. Over the last two decades optical traps have helped uncover the working principles of conventional molecular motors, such as kinesin and dynein, but only recently have they been applied to study kinetochore function. The most useful traps combine sensitive position detectors and servo-control, allowing them to be operated as force clamps that maintain constant loads on objects as they move. Our instrument, which is among the simplest designs that permits force clamping, relies on a computer-controlled piezoelectric stage and a single laser for trapping and position detection. We apply it in motility assays where beads coated with pure microtubule-binding kinetochore components are attached to the tips of individual dynamic microtubules. Like kinetochores in vivo, the beads remain tip-attached, undergoing movements coupled to filament assembly and disassembly. The force clamp provides many benefits over instruments that lack feedback control. It allows tension to be applied continuously during both assembly- and disassembly-driven movement, providing a close match to the physiological situation. It also enables tracking with high resolution, and simplifies data interpretation by eliminating artifacts due to molecular compliance. The formation of persistent, load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips is fundamental to all kinetochore activities. Our direct, physical study of kinetochore-microtubule coupling may therefore furnish insights into many vital kinetochore functions, including correction of aberrant attachments and generation of the 'wait-anaphase' signals that delay mitosis until all kinetochores are properly attached.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20096784      PMCID: PMC2884078          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  74 in total

Review 1.  Kinesin motor mechanics: binding, stepping, tracking, gating, and limping.

Authors:  Steven M Block
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex.

Authors:  Claudio Ciferri; Sebastiano Pasqualato; Emanuela Screpanti; Gianluca Varetti; Stefano Santaguida; Gabriel Dos Reis; Alessio Maiolica; Jessica Polka; Jennifer G De Luca; Peter De Wulf; Mogjiborahman Salek; Juri Rappsilber; Carolyn A Moores; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision.

Authors:  J Gelles; B J Schnapp; M P Sheetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry.

Authors:  K Svoboda; C F Schmidt; B J Schnapp; S M Block
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements.

Authors:  S Inoué; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Four new subunits of the Dam1-Duo1 complex reveal novel functions in sister kinetochore biorientation.

Authors:  Carsten Janke; Jennifer Ortíz; Tomoyuki U Tanaka; Johannes Lechner; Elmar Schiebel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores by the type 1 phosphatase Glc7p.

Authors:  I Sassoon; F F Severin; P D Andrews; M R Taba; K B Kaplan; A J Ashford; M J Stark; P K Sorger; A A Hyman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  A modular polycistronic expression system for overexpressing protein complexes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Tan
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.650

9.  Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies.

Authors:  Tony R Hazbun; Lars Malmström; Scott Anderson; Beth J Graczyk; Bethany Fox; Michael Riffle; Bryan A Sundin; J Derringer Aranda; W Hayes McDonald; Chun-Hwei Chiu; Brian E Snydsman; Phillip Bradley; Eric G D Muller; Stanley Fields; David Baker; John R Yates; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function.

Authors:  I M Cheeseman; C Brew; M Wolyniak; A Desai; S Anderson; N Muster; J R Yates; T C Huffaker; D G Drubin; G Barnes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12-24       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Ndc80 kinetochore complex directly modulates microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Neil T Umbreit; Daniel R Gestaut; Jerry F Tien; Breanna S Vollmar; Tamir Gonen; Charles L Asbury; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Phosphoregulation promotes release of kinetochores from dynamic microtubules via multiple mechanisms.

Authors:  Krishna K Sarangapani; Bungo Akiyoshi; Nicole M Duggan; Sue Biggins; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Measuring kinetochore-microtubule interaction in vitro.

Authors:  Jonathan W Driver; Andrew F Powers; Krishna K Sarangapani; Sue Biggins; Charles L Asbury
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Regulation of outer kinetochore Ndc80 complex-based microtubule attachments by the central kinetochore Mis12/MIND complex.

Authors:  Emily M Kudalkar; Emily A Scarborough; Neil T Umbreit; Alex Zelter; Daniel R Gestaut; Michael Riffle; Richard S Johnson; Michael J MacCoss; Charles L Asbury; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A TOG Protein Confers Tension Sensitivity to Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments.

Authors:  Matthew P Miller; Charles L Asbury; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Kinetochore biorientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a tightly folded conformation of the Ndc80 complex.

Authors:  Jerry F Tien; Neil T Umbreit; Alex Zelter; Michael Riffle; Michael R Hoopmann; Richard S Johnson; Bryan R Fonslow; John R Yates; Michael J MacCoss; Robert L Moritz; Charles L Asbury; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Reconstitution and functional analysis of kinetochore subcomplexes.

Authors:  Daniel R Gestaut; Jeremy Cooper; Charles L Asbury; Trisha N Davis; Linda Wordeman
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.441

10.  Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B.

Authors:  Jerry F Tien; Neil T Umbreit; Daniel R Gestaut; Andrew D Franck; Jeremy Cooper; Linda Wordeman; Tamir Gonen; Charles L Asbury; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.