Literature DB >> 11919095

Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme.

S A Russ1, F Rickards, Z Poulakis, M Barker, K Saunders, M Wake.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether a two tier universal infant hearing screening programme (population based risk factor ascertainment and universal distraction testing) lowered median age of diagnosis of bilateral congenital hearing impairment (CHI) >40 dB HL in Victoria, Australia.
METHODS: Comparison of whole population birth cohorts pre and post introduction of the Victorian Infant Hearing Screening Program (VIHSP). All babies surviving the neonatal period born in Victoria in 1989 (pre-VIHSP) and 1993 (post-VIHSP) were studied. (1) Pre-1992: distraction test at 7-9 months. (2) Post-1992: infants with risk factors for CHI referred for auditory brain stem evoked response (ABR) assessment; all others screened by modified distraction test at 7-9 months.
RESULTS: Of the 1989 cohort (n = 63 454), 1.65/1000 were fitted with hearing aids for CHI by end 1995, compared with 2.09/1000 of the 1993 cohort (n = 64 116) by end 1999. Of these, 79 cases from the 1989 cohort (1.24/1000) and 72 cases from the 1993 cohort (1.12/1000) had CHI >40 dB HL. Median age at diagnosis of CHI >40 dB HL for the 1989 birth cohort was 20.3 months, and for the 1993 cohort was 14.2 months. Median age at diagnosis fell significantly for severe CHI but not for moderate or profound CHI. Significantly more babies with CHI >40 dB HL were diagnosed by 6 months of age in 1993 than in 1989 (21.7% v 6.3%). Compared to the six years pre-VIHSP, numbers aided by six months were consistently higher in the six years post-VIHSP (1.05 per 100 000 births versus 13.4 per 100 000 births per year).
CONCLUSIONS: VIHSP resulted in very early diagnosis for more infants and lowered median age of diagnosis of severe CHI. However, overall results were disappointing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11919095      PMCID: PMC1719155          DOI: 10.1136/adc.86.4.245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  13 in total

1.  Universal newborn hearing screening: should we leap before we look?

Authors:  J L Paradise
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Screening for hearing loss in childhood: a study of national practice.

Authors:  S Stewart-Brown; M N Haslum
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-30

3.  Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveillance methods.

Authors:  P E Scanlon; J M Bamford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Screening for hearing impairment in the first year of life.

Authors:  B McCormick
Journal:  Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse       Date:  1986-06

5.  Feasibility of screening all neonates for hearing loss.

Authors:  D M Hall; J Garner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Screening for hearing loss in an at-risk neonatal population using evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R Meredith; D Stephens; S Hogan; P H Cartlidge; M Drayton
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1994

7.  Childhood deafness in Australia. Incidence and maternal rubella, 1949-1980.

Authors:  L J Upfold; J Isepy
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1982-10-02       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery.

Authors:  B R Vohr; J E Widen; B Cone-Wesson; Y S Sininger; M P Gorga; R C Folsom; S J Norton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Epidemiologic patterns in childhood hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  J Davidson; M L Hyde; P W Alberti
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing?

Authors:  C Robertson; S Aldridge; F Jarman; K Saunders; Z Poulakis; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of hearing screening program for primary school children in southern Iran, Shiraz.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Sara Babakhani Fard; Mohsen Bayati; Fatemeh Jafarlou; Mohammadreza Parhizgar; Mehdi Rezaee; Khosro Keshavarz
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.567

3.  Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme.

Authors:  Z Poulakis; M Barker; M Wake
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Hearing loss in children with very low birth weight: current review of epidemiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  R Cristobal; J S Oghalai
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Population Outcomes of Three Approaches to Detection of Congenital Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Melissa Wake; Teresa Y C Ching; Karen Wirth; Zeffie Poulakis; Fiona K Mensah; Lisa Gold; Alison King; Hannah E Bryson; Sheena Reilly; Field Rickards
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  The cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen Colgan; Lisa Gold; Karen Wirth; Teresa Ching; Zeffie Poulakis; Field Rickards; Melissa Wake
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Qualitative analysis of parents' experience with early detection of hearing loss.

Authors:  S A Russ; A A Kuo; Z Poulakis; M Barker; F Rickards; K Saunders; F C Jarman; M Wake; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Qualitative analysis of parents' experience of hearing loss of their school going children of a rural area of Nagpur.

Authors:  Subhash B Thakre; Sushama S Thakre; Swapnil Alone
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among a Representative Sample of Canadian Children and Adolescents, 3 to 19 Years of Age.

Authors:  Katya Polena Feder; David Michaud; James McNamee; Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Pamela Ramage-Morin; Yves Beauregard
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Age at onset of training in children with hearing and speech disorders and the analysis of related factors in Turkey.

Authors:  Ayse Sanem Sahli
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.638

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.