OBJECTIVES: Blood culture contamination is a common problem in the emergency department (ED) that leads to unnecessary patient morbidity and health care costs. The study objective was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement (QI) intervention for reducing blood culture contamination in an ED. METHODS: The authors developed a QI intervention to reduce blood culture contamination in the ED and then evaluated its effectiveness in a prospective interrupted times series study. The QI intervention involved changing the technique of blood culture specimen collection from the traditional clean procedure to a new sterile procedure, with standardized use of sterile gloves and a new materials kit containing a 2% chlorhexidine skin antisepsis device, a sterile fenestrated drape, a sterile needle, and a procedural checklist. The intervention was implemented in a university-affiliated ED and its effect on blood culture contamination evaluated by comparing the biweekly percentages of blood cultures contaminated during a 48-week baseline period (clean technique) and 48-week intervention period (sterile technique), using segmented regression analysis with adjustment for secular trends and first-order autocorrelation. The goal was to achieve and maintain a contamination rate below 3%. RESULTS: During the baseline period, 321 of 7,389 (4.3%) cultures were contaminated, compared to 111 of 6,590 (1.7%) during the intervention period (p < 0.001). In the segmented regression model, the intervention was associated with an immediate 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2% to 3.2%) absolute reduction in contamination. The contamination rate was maintained below 3% during each biweekly interval throughout the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: A QI assessment of ED blood culture contamination led to development of a targeted intervention to convert the process of blood culture collection from a clean to a fully sterile procedure. Implementation of this intervention led to an immediate and sustained reduction of contamination in an ED with a high baseline contamination rate.
OBJECTIVES: Blood culture contamination is a common problem in the emergency department (ED) that leads to unnecessary patient morbidity and health care costs. The study objective was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement (QI) intervention for reducing blood culture contamination in an ED. METHODS: The authors developed a QI intervention to reduce blood culture contamination in the ED and then evaluated its effectiveness in a prospective interrupted times series study. The QI intervention involved changing the technique of blood culture specimen collection from the traditional clean procedure to a new sterile procedure, with standardized use of sterile gloves and a new materials kit containing a 2% chlorhexidine skin antisepsis device, a sterile fenestrated drape, a sterile needle, and a procedural checklist. The intervention was implemented in a university-affiliated ED and its effect on blood culture contamination evaluated by comparing the biweekly percentages of blood cultures contaminated during a 48-week baseline period (clean technique) and 48-week intervention period (sterile technique), using segmented regression analysis with adjustment for secular trends and first-order autocorrelation. The goal was to achieve and maintain a contamination rate below 3%. RESULTS: During the baseline period, 321 of 7,389 (4.3%) cultures were contaminated, compared to 111 of 6,590 (1.7%) during the intervention period (p < 0.001). In the segmented regression model, the intervention was associated with an immediate 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2% to 3.2%) absolute reduction in contamination. The contamination rate was maintained below 3% during each biweekly interval throughout the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: A QI assessment of ED blood culture contamination led to development of a targeted intervention to convert the process of blood culture collection from a clean to a fully sterile procedure. Implementation of this intervention led to an immediate and sustained reduction of contamination in an ED with a high baseline contamination rate.
Authors: Wesley H Self; Theodore Speroff; Candace D McNaughton; Patty W Wright; Geraldine Miller; James G Johnson; Titus L Daniels; Thomas R Talbot Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: O Mimoz; A Karim; A Mercat; M Cosseron; B Falissard; F Parker; C Richard; K Samii; P Nordmann Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1999-12-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M P Weinstein; M L Towns; S M Quartey; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; G Parmigiani; L B Reller Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: D Souvenir; D E Anderson; S Palpant; H Mroch; S Askin; J Anderson; J Claridge; J Eiland; C Malone; M W Garrison; P Watson; D M Campbell Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Wesley H Self; Thomas R Talbot; Barbara R Paul; Sean P Collins; Michael J Ward Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Derek J Williams; Matthew Hall; Jeffrey S Gerber; Mark I Neuman; Adam L Hersh; Thomas V Brogan; Kavita Parikh; Sanjay Mahant; Anne J Blaschke; Samir S Shah; Carlos G Grijalva Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Gary V Doern; Karen C Carroll; Daniel J Diekema; Kevin W Garey; Mark E Rupp; Melvin P Weinstein; Daniel J Sexton Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Derek J Williams; Kathryn M Edwards; Wesley H Self; Yuwei Zhu; Krow Ampofo; Andrew T Pavia; Adam L Hersh; Sandra R Arnold; Jonathan A McCullers; Lauri A Hicks; Anna M Bramley; Seema Jain; Carlos G Grijalva Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Wesley H Self; Joyce Mickanin; Carlos G Grijalva; Freda H Grant; Michelle C Henderson; Glenda Corley; D Glen Blaschke Ii; Candace D McNaughton; Tyler W Barrett; Thomas R Talbot; Barbara R Paul Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.451