Literature DB >> 33737624

Sites of blood collection and topical antiseptics associated with contaminated cultures: prospective observational study.

Koshi Ota1, Koji Oba2, Keisuke Fukui3, Yuri Ito3, Emi Hamada4, Naomi Mori4, Masahiro Oka5, Kanna Ota5, Yuriko Shibata6, Akira Takasu5.   

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether puncture sites for blood sampling and topical disinfectants are associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) of a single institution. This single-center, prospective observational study of 249 consecutive patients aged ≥ 20 years proceeded in the ED of a university hospital in Japan during 6 months. Pairs of blood samples were collected for aerobic and anaerobic culture from all patients in the ED. Physicians selected puncture sites and topical disinfectants according to their personal preference. We found 50 (20.1%) patients with potentially contaminated blood cultures. Fifty-six (22.5%) patients were true bacteremia and 143 (57.4%) patients were true negatives. Multivariate analysis associated more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine than with alcohol/chlorhexidine (adjusted risk difference, 12.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8-16.9; P < 0.001). Sites of blood collection were also associated with contamination. Femoral and central venous with other sites were associated with contamination more frequently than venous sites (adjusted risk difference), 13.1% (95% CI 8.2-17.9; P < 0.001]) vs. 17.3% (95% CI 3.6-31.0; P = 0.013). Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly higher when blood was collected from femoral sites and when povidone-iodine was the topical antiseptic.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33737624     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85614-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  26 in total

Review 1.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Cost analysis of strategies to reduce blood culture contamination in the emergency department: sterile collection kits and phlebotomy teams.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Thomas R Talbot; Barbara R Paul; Sean P Collins; Michael J Ward
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan R Snyder; Alessandra M Favoretto; Rich Ann Baetz; James H Derzon; Bereneice M Madison; Diana Mass; Colleen S Shaw; Christopher D Layfield; Robert H Christenson; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 3.281

4.  Blood culture contamination rates after skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine in a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Lauren Marlowe; Rakesh D Mistry; Susan Coffin; Kateri H Leckerman; Karin L McGowan; Dingwei Dai; Louis M Bell; Theoklis Zaoutis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 5.  Skin antiseptics in venous puncture-site disinfection for prevention of blood culture contamination: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Caldeira; C David; C Sampaio
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Economic health care costs of blood culture contamination: A systematic review.

Authors:  Casey Dempsey; Erik Skoglund; Kenneth L Muldrew; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting.

Authors:  Y M Alahmadi; M A Aldeyab; J C McElnay; M G Scott; F W Darwish Elhajji; F A Magee; M Dowds; C Edwards; L Fullerton; A Tate; M P Kearney
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Evaluation of ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol) for skin antisepsis in preparation for blood culture collection.

Authors:  E McLellan; R Townsend; H K Parsons
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 6.072

9.  Reducing blood culture contamination in the emergency department: an interrupted time series quality improvement study.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Theodore Speroff; Carlos G Grijalva; Candace D McNaughton; Jacki Ashburn; Dandan Liu; Patrick G Arbogast; Stephan Russ; Alan B Storrow; Thomas R Talbot
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Comorbidity patterns in patients with chronic diseases in general practice.

Authors:  Luis García-Olmos; Carlos H Salvador; Ángel Alberquilla; David Lora; Montserrat Carmona; Pilar García-Sagredo; Mario Pascual; Adolfo Muñoz; José Luis Monteagudo; Fernando García-López
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Regression discontinuity of blood culture contamination rate after changing of disinfectants: retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Koshi Ota; Daisuke Nishioka; Yuri Ito; Emi Hamada; Naomi Mori; Tomonobu Nishii; Kanna Ota; Yuriko Shibata; Akira Takasu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  High Yield of Blood Cultures in the Etiologic Diagnosis of Cellulitis, Erysipelas, and Cutaneous Abscess in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Tomohiro Taniguchi; Sanefumi Tsuha; Soichi Shiiki; Masashi Narita; Mariko Teruya; Teruyuki Hachiman; Noriyasu Kogachi
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.423

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.