Literature DB >> 23569672

Anatomical variance in acetabular anteversion does not predict hip fracture patterns in the elderly: a retrospective study in 135 patients.

Megan Y Kamath1, Nathan W Coleman, Stephen M Belkoff, Simon C Mears.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that variances in the anatomy of the acetabulum determine the type of hip fracture in elderly patients. Based on this concept, an overly anteverted acetabulum would lead to impingement of the femoral neck against the posterior rim of the acetabulum, causing a femoral neck fracture, whereas with a retroverted acetabulum, external rotation of the hip would be limited by the capsular tissues attached to the trochanteric region, causing a trochanteric fracture. To test the hypothesis that acetabular version predicts hip fracture type in elderly patients, we measured acetabular version using computed tomography scans for 135 patients with hip fracture. Logistic regression analysis was used to check for an association between version angle and fracture type. No significant relationship between acetabular version and fracture type was found. Therefore, we conclude that acetabular version angle does not predict hip fracture type in the elderly, and our data do not support the impingement concept as the mechanism of hip fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elderly; femoral neck fracture; hip fracture; trochanteric fracture

Year:  2011        PMID: 23569672      PMCID: PMC3597302          DOI: 10.1177/2151458510391985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil        ISSN: 2151-4585


  22 in total

1.  Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae.

Authors:  K M Fox; J Magaziner; J R Hebel; J E Kenzora; T M Kashner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 2.  Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?

Authors:  C A Mautalen; E M Vega; T A Einhorn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Proximal femoral fracture. Range of hip motion as a predictor of fracture type.

Authors:  M Binns; D Shardlow; R Soames
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoroplasty--augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement--feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential.

Authors:  J Beckmann; S J Ferguson; M Gebauer; C Luering; B Gasser; P Heini
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 5.  Hip fracture.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures have different risk factors: a prospective study.

Authors:  K M Fox; S R Cummings; E Williams; K Stone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quantitative ultrasound parameters as well as bone mineral density are better predictors of trochanteric than cervical hip fractures in elderly women. Results from the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  A M Schott; D Hans; F Duboeuf; P Dargent-Molina; T Hajri; G Bréart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning.

Authors:  M Maruyama; J R Feinberg; W N Capello; J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Biomechanics of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.586

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.