Literature DB >> 17723795

Biomechanics of osteoporotic fractures.

Matthew J Silva1.   

Abstract

The objective of this review article is to present biomechanics concepts and data relevant to osteoporotic fractures. Fractures are mechanical events that occur when the applied load exceeds the fracture load (bone strength); both loading and strength must be considered to understand fracture risk. Hip fractures are almost always due to a fall, but only 5% of falls result in fracture. Hip fracture risk is greatest for a sideways fall that impacts on the greater trochanter. The loading events that cause vertebral fractures are poorly understood but include falls and heavy lifting. Activities that involve forward flexion and lifting generate the largest forces on the spine. Factors that affect bone strength include bone size (geometry) and bone density (vBMD). Men have larger bones at all ages compared to women and this is the main factor in the gender difference in whole-bone strength. Both men and women lose trabecular bone density and thus bone strength with aging, which is the main reason for the age-related loss of bone strength at the hip and spine, although dramatic decreases in the toughness of cortical bone may also contribute to osteoporotic fragility. The factor of risk (applied force/fracture force) is a useful concept for considering both the injury and the disease component of osteoporotic fractures. Within this article, I will review data on age-related changes in factors that affect fracture risk. Advanced engineering concepts will not be presented, but a familiarity with basic mechanical principles is assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17723795     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  30 in total

1.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity.

Authors:  K M Kim; J K Brown; K J Kim; H S Choi; H N Kim; Y Rhee; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to microCT imaging and microFE modeling.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Karsten Schwieger; Markus B Huber; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  The ratio of anterior and posterior vertebral heights reinforces the utility of DXA in assessment of vertebrae strength.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Mariusz Korkosz; Andrzej Wróbel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Influence of body weight on bone mass, architecture and turnover.

Authors:  Urszula T Iwaniec; Russell T Turner
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Antihistamine use and the risk of injurious falls or fracture in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Cho; J Myung; H S Suh; H-Y Kang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.

Authors:  E Dall'Ara; D Pahr; P Varga; F Kainberger; P Zysset
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Sensitivity of patient-specific vertebral finite element model from low dose imaging to material properties and loading conditions.

Authors:  Christophe Travert; Erwan Jolivet; Emilie Sapin-de Brosses; David Mitton; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Anatomical distribution of vertebral fractures: comparison of pediatric and adult spines.

Authors:  K Siminoski; K-C Lee; H Jen; R Warshawski; M A Matzinger; N Shenouda; M Charron; C Coblentz; J Dubois; R Kloiber; H Nadel; K O'Brien; M Reed; K Sparrow; C Webber; B Lentle; L M Ward
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.