Literature DB >> 17922874

Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3-Tesla scanner.

Anurag K Singh1, Axel Krieger, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Peter Guion, Robert L Grubb, Paul S Albert, Greg Metzger, Karen Ullman, Sharon Smith, Gabor Fichtinger, Iclal Ocak, Peter Choyke, Cynthia Ménard, Jonathan Coleman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cancer yield of transrectal prostate biopsies in a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and recent negative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2004 and November 2005, patients with at least one previous negative prostate biopsy within the previous 12 months had MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate in a 3-T MRI scanner. Patients with previous positive biopsies for cancer were excluded. Target selection was based on T2-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging studies.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients were eligible; their median (range) age was 61 (47-74) years and PSA value 4.90 (1.3-12.3) ng/mL. Most patients had one previous negative biopsy (range 1-4). Four patients had a family history of prostate cancer. There were 37 distinct targets based on T2-weighted imaging. Fifteen of 16 distinct DCE abnormalities were co-localized with a target based on T2-weighted imaging. Despite this correlation, only one of 13 patients had a directed biopsy positive for cancer. Including systematic biopsies, two of 13 patients had a biopsy positive for prostate cancer. One patient had prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and one had atypical glands in the specimen.
CONCLUSION: The prostate-cancer yield of transrectal biopsies in a 3-T MRI scanner, among patients with recent negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies, is similar to repeat systematic TRUS-guided biopsy. DCE correlates with T2-imaging but does not appear to improve prostate cancer yield in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922874     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07219.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  18 in total

1.  Focal therapy: a new paradigm for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Basir Tareen; Guilherme Godoy; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

2.  Robotic image-guided needle interventions of the prostate.

Authors:  Pierre C Mozer; Alan W Partin; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

3.  The Efficacy of Target Biopsy of Suspected Cancer Lesions Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and/or Transrectal Ultrasonography during Initial Prostate Biopsies: Comparison of Outcomes between Two Physicians.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Seiya Inoue; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Akihisa Yao; Masashi Honda; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 4.  MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of current clinical results.

Authors:  Christiaan G Overduin; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Sandeep S Arora; Kristen R Scarpato; Daniel Barocas
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Development and Evaluation of an Actuated MRI-Compatible Robotic System for MRI-Guided Prostate Intervention.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Sang-Eun Song; Nathan B Cho; Iulian Iordachita; Peter Guion; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.303

8.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 9.  Advancements in magnetic resonance-guided robotic interventions in the prostate.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12

10.  Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; B Nicolas Bloch; David F Yao; Martin G Sanda; Long Ngo; Elizabeth M Genega; Ivan Pedrosa; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.