Literature DB >> 23567012

Considerations for an institution for evaluation of diabetes technology devices to improve their quality in the European Union.

Lutz Heinemann1, Guido Freckmann, Theodor Koschinsky.   

Abstract

All medical devices used for self-monitoring of blood glucose (BG), insulin injection, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and continuous glucose monitoring in the European Union (EU) must have a Communauté Européenne (CE) mark. However, the approval process for obtaining this mark is different from that used by the European Medicines Agency in the EU for drugs or by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States for such medical and in vitro diagnostic devices. The notified bodies involved in the CE mark process perform this evaluation in cooperation with the manufacturers. They have only limited diabetes know-how; they have to handle all kinds of medical devices. There are devices for therapy on the market in the EU (i.e., they have market approval) that do not fulfill quality requirements, as indicated, for example, in the international norm ISO 15197 for BG test systems. Evaluation of the performance of such systems is usually provided by the manufacturers. What is missing in the EU is an independent institution that performs regular and critical evaluation of the quality of devices used for diabetes therapy before and also after their market approval. The work of such an institution would focus on BG test systems (these represent two-thirds of the market of medical devices for diabetes treatment) but would also evaluate the performance of other devices. It has to be clarified what legal framework is required for such an institution and how it can be financed; probably this can be done in a shared manner by the manufacturers of such devices and the health insurance companies. Positive evaluation results should be a prerequisite prior to any reimbursement for such devices.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23567012      PMCID: PMC3737655          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  9 in total

Review 1.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose with a focus on analytical quality: an overview.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Grete Monsen; Svein Skeie; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: time for reform?

Authors:  A J M Boulton; S Del Prato
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Measurement quality of blood glucose meters: is there a need for an institution with an unbiased view?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

5.  Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.

Authors:  Ronald L Brazg; Leslie J Klaff; Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.

Authors:  Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Christina Schmid; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

7.  System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

8.  Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Michael Mitri; Petra B Musholt; Daniela Sachsenheimer; Marcus Borchert; Andrew Yap; Thomas Forst
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.580

9.  System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Eva Zschornack; Serge Kocher; Jacques Tshiananga; Frank Heister; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.118

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Freedom of speech and science: can companies force us to withdraw data they don't like?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 2.  Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Malte Rutschmann; Cornelia Haug; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-14

3.  Quality of HbA1c Measurement in the Practice: The German Perspective.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.

Authors:  Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Christina Liebing; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-01

5.  Effective assessment of diabetes control using personal glucometers (CONTOURLINK, Bayer, Germany; CALLA, Wellion, Austria; LINUS, Agamatrix, USA).

Authors:  R Chlup; B Doubravova; J Bartek; J Zapletalova; O Krystynik; V Prochazka
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.434

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.