Literature DB >> 26646351

The better to eat you with: the comparative feeding morphology of phocid seals (Pinnipedia, Phocidae).

Sarah S Kienle1,2, Annalisa Berta1.   

Abstract

One adaptation crucial to the survival of mammalian lineages that secondarily transitioned from land to water environments was the ability to capture and consume prey underwater. Phocid seals have evolved diverse feeding strategies to feed in the marine environment, and the objectives of this study were to document the specialized feeding morphologies and identify feeding strategies used by extant phocids. This study used principal component analysis (PCA) to determine the major axes of diversification in the skull for all extant phocid taxa and the recently extinct Caribbean monk seal (n = 19). Prey data gathered from the literature and musculoskeletal data from dissections were included to provide a comprehensive description of each feeding strategy. Random Forest analysis was used to determine the morphological, ecological and phylogenetic variables that best described each feeding strategy. There is morphological evidence for four feeding strategies in phocids: filter; grip and tear; suction; and pierce feeding. These feeding strategies are supported by quantitative cranial and mandibular characters, dietary information, musculoskeletal data and, for some species, behavioral observations. Most phocid species are pierce feeders, using a combination of biting and suction to opportunistically catch prey. Grip and tear and filter feeding are specialized strategies with specific morphological adaptations. These unique adaptations have allowed leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) and crabeater seals (Lobodon carcinophaga) to exploit novel ecological niches and prey types. This study provides the first cranial and mandibular morphological evidence for the use of specialized suction feeding in hooded seals (Cystophora cristata), northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) and southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). The most important variables in determining the feeding strategy of a given phocid species were cranial and mandibular shape, diet, and phylogeny. These results provide a framework for understanding the evolution and adaptability of feeding strategies employed by extant phocid species, and these findings can be applied to other pinniped lineages and extinct taxa.
© 2015 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phocidae; Pinnipedia; adaptation; diet; evolution; feeding; morphology; skull

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26646351      PMCID: PMC5341551          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  22 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic trail-following in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina).

Authors:  G Dehnhardt; B Mauck; W Hanke; H Bleckmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Adaptations of the cetacean hyolingual apparatus for aquatic feeding and thermoregulation.

Authors:  Alexander J Werth
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Functional implications of variation in tooth spacing and crown size in pinnipedimorpha (mammalia: carnivora).

Authors:  Morgan Churchill; Mark T Clementz
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Morphology and biomechanics of the pinniped jaw: mandibular evolution without mastication.

Authors:  Katrina E Jones; Christopher B Ruff; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Quantitative anatomical observations on the skeletal and muscular systems of four species of Antarctic seals.

Authors:  M M Bryden; W J Felts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Face shape of unaffected parents with cleft affected offspring: combining three-dimensional surface imaging and geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  S M Weinberg; S D Naidoo; K M Bardi; C A Brandon; K Neiswanger; J M Resick; R A Martin; M L Marazita
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Comparative assessment of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Colleen Reichmuth; Marla M Holt; Jason Mulsow; Jillian M Sills; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Fused traditional and geometric morphometrics demonstrate pinniped whisker diversity.

Authors:  Carly C Ginter; Thomas J DeWitt; Frank E Fish; Christopher D Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) use raptorial biting and suction feeding when targeting prey in different foraging scenarios.

Authors:  David P Hocking; Marcia Salverson; Erich M G Fitzgerald; Alistair R Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multivariate analysis of functional metagenomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Dinsdale; Robert A Edwards; Barbara A Bailey; Imre Tuba; Sajia Akhter; Katelyn McNair; Robert Schmieder; Naneh Apkarian; Michelle Creek; Eric Guan; Mayra Hernandez; Katherine Isaacs; Chris Peterson; Todd Regh; Vadim Ponomarenko
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A behavioural framework for the evolution of feeding in predatory aquatic mammals.

Authors:  David P Hocking; Felix G Marx; Travis Park; Erich M G Fitzgerald; Alistair R Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Revisiting the behavioural framework of feeding in predatory aquatic mammals.

Authors:  Sarah S Kienle; Chris J Law; Daniel P Costa; Annalisa Berta; Rita S Mehta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Specialized morphology corresponds to a generalist diet: linking form and function in smashing mantis shrimp crustaceans.

Authors:  Maya S deVries; Brian C Stock; John H Christy; Gregory R Goldsmith; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Vertebrate Evolution Conserves Hindbrain Circuits despite Diverse Feeding and Breathing Modes.

Authors:  Shun Li; Fan Wang
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-28

5.  Dental pulp exposure, periapical inflammation and suppurative osteomyelitis of the jaws in juvenile Baltic grey seals (Halichoerus grypus grypus) from the late 19th century.

Authors:  Uwe Kierdorf; Morten T Olsen; Patricia Kahle; Catharina Ludolphy; Horst Kierdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sexual dimorphism in the walrus mandible: comparative description and geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Mathieu Boisville; Narimane Chatar; Olivier Lambert; Leonard Dewaele
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.061

7.  The isotopic niche of Atlantic, biting marine mammals and its relationship to skull morphology and body size.

Authors:  Massimiliano Drago; Marco Signaroli; Meica Valdivia; Enrique M González; Asunción Borrell; Alex Aguilar; Luis Cardona
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mouth gape determines the response of marine top predators to long-term fishery-induced changes in food web structure.

Authors:  Massimiliano Drago; Valentina Franco-Trecu; Angel M Segura; Meica Valdivia; Enrique M González; Alex Aguilar; Luis Cardona
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparative examination of pinniped craniofacial musculature and its role in aquatic feeding.

Authors:  Sarah S Kienle; Roxanne D Cuthbertson; Joy S Reidenberg
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Morphological identification in skull between spotted seal and harbor seal using geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Yuichi Arai; Minoru Kanaiwa; Mio Kato; Mari Kobayashi
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 1.966

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.