Literature DB >> 11008832

Masking in three pinnipeds: underwater, low-frequency critical ratios.

B L Southall1, R J Schusterman, D Kastak.   

Abstract

Behavioral techniques were used to determine underwater masked hearing thresholds for a northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris), a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), and a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Octave-band white noise maskers were centered at five test frequencies ranging from 200 to 2500 Hz; a slightly wider noise band was used for testing at 100 Hz. Critical ratios were calculated at one masking noise level for each test frequency. Above 200 Hz, critical ratios increased with frequency. This pattern is similar to that observed in most animals tested, and indicates that these pinnipeds lack specializations for detecting low-frequency tonal sounds in noise. However, the individual pinnipeds in this study, particularly the northern elephant seal, detected signals at relatively low signal-to-noise ratios. These results provide a means of estimating zones of auditory masking for pinnipeds exposed to anthropogenic noise sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008832     DOI: 10.1121/1.1288409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Characterizing the relative contributions of large vessels to total ocean noise fields: a case study using the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary.

Authors:  Leila Hatch; Christopher Clark; Richard Merrick; Sofie Van Parijs; Dimitri Ponirakis; Kurt Schwehr; Michael Thompson; David Wiley
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  The possible effects of anthropogenic acoustic pollution on marine mammals' reproduction: an emerging threat to animal extinction.

Authors:  Ghulam Nabi; Richard William McLaughlin; Yujiang Hao; Kexiong Wang; Xianyuan Zeng; Suliman Khan; Ding Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Acoustically advertising male harbour seals in southeast Alaska do not make biologically relevant acoustic adjustments in the presence of vessel noise.

Authors:  Leanna P Matthews; Michelle E H Fournet; Christine Gabriele; Holger Klinck; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Hearing in fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-03

Review 5.  Mechanisms of auditory masking in marine mammals.

Authors:  Brian K Branstetter; Jillian M Sills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Hearing in the sea otter (Enhydra lutris): auditory profiles for an amphibious marine carnivore.

Authors:  Asila Ghoul; Colleen Reichmuth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Comparative assessment of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Colleen Reichmuth; Marla M Holt; Jason Mulsow; Jillian M Sills; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Aerial low-frequency hearing in captive and free-ranging harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) measured using auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Klaus Lucke; Gordon D Hastie; Kerstin Ternes; Bernie McConnell; Simon Moss; Deborah J F Russell; Heike Weber; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Recreational boats and turtles: behavioral mismatches result in high rates of injury.

Authors:  Lori A Lester; Harold W Avery; Andrew S Harrison; Edward A Standora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.