Literature DB >> 14514219

Auditory masking in three pinnipeds: aerial critical ratios and direct critical bandwidth measurements.

Brandon L Southall1, Ronald J Schusterman, David Kastak.   

Abstract

This study expands the limited understanding of pinniped aerial auditory masking and includes measurements at some of the relatively low frequencies predominant in many pinniped vocalizations. Behavioral techniques were used to obtain aerial critical ratios (CRs) within a hemianechoic chamber for a northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris), a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), and a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Simultaneous, octave-band noise maskers centered at seven test frequencies (0.2-8.0 kHz) were used to determine aerial CRs. Narrower and variable bandwidth masking noise was also used in order to obtain direct critical bandwidths (CBWs). The aerial CRs are very similar in magnitude and in frequency-specific differences (increasing gradually with test frequency) to underwater CRs for these subjects, demonstrating that pinniped cochlear processes are similar both in air and water. While, like most mammals, these pinniped subjects apparently lack specialization for enhanced detection of specific frequencies over masking noise, they consistently detect signals across a wide range of frequencies at relatively low signal-to-noise ratios. Direct CBWs are 3.2 to 14.2 times wider than estimated based on aerial CRs. The combined masking data are significant in terms of assessing aerial anthropogenic noise impacts, effective aerial communicative ranges, and amphibious aspects of pinniped cochlear mechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14514219     DOI: 10.1121/1.1587733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Hearing in fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-03

Review 2.  Mechanisms of auditory masking in marine mammals.

Authors:  Brian K Branstetter; Jillian M Sills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Hearing in the sea otter (Enhydra lutris): auditory profiles for an amphibious marine carnivore.

Authors:  Asila Ghoul; Colleen Reichmuth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Comparative assessment of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Colleen Reichmuth; Marla M Holt; Jason Mulsow; Jillian M Sills; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Assessing the disturbance potential of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) on gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) at breeding colonies in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Authors:  Lauren Arona; Julian Dale; Susan G Heaslip; Michael O Hammill; David W Johnston
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  In-air hearing in Hawaiian monk seals: implications for understanding the auditory biology of Monachinae seals.

Authors:  Brandi Ruscher; Jillian M Sills; Beau P Richter; Colleen Reichmuth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.