Literature DB >> 31053979

Simultaneous evaluation of plaque stability and ischemic potential of coronary lesions in a fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Xinlei Wu1,2, Clemens von Birgelen3, Su Zhang1,2, Daixin Ding1,2, Jiayue Huang1,2, Shengxian Tu4,5.   

Abstract

The measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and superficial wall stress (SWS) identifies inducible myocardial ischemia and plaque vulnerability, respectively. A simultaneous evaluation of both FFR and SWS is still lacking, while it may have a major impact on therapy. A new computational model of one-way fluid-structure interaction (FSI) was implemented and used to perform a total of 54 analyses in virtual coronary lesion models, based on plaque compositions, arterial remodeling patterns, and stenosis morphologies under physiological conditions. Due to a greater lumen dilation and more induced strain, FFR in the lipid-rich lesions (0.81 ± 0.15) was higher than that in fibrous lesions (0.79 ± 0.16, P = 0.001) and calcified lesions (0.79 ± 0.16, P = 0.001). Four types of lesions were further defined, based on the combination of cutoff values for FFR (0.80) and maximum relative SWS (30 kPa): The level of risk increased from (1) plaques with mild-to-moderate stenosis but negative remodeling for lipid-rich (Type A: non-ischemic, stable) to (2) lipid-rich plaques with mild-to-moderate stenosis and without-to-positive remodeling (Type B: non-ischemic, unstable) or plaques with severe stenosis but negative remodeling for lipid-rich (Type C: ischemic, stable) to (3) lipid-rich plaques with severe stenosis and without-to-positive remodeling (Type D: ischemic, unstable). The analysis of FSI to simultaneously evaluate inducible myocardial ischemia and plaque stability may be useful to identify coronary lesions at a high risk and to ultimately optimize treatment. Further research is warranted to assess whether a more aggressive treatment may improve the prognosis of patients with non-ischemic, intermediate, and unstable lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular biomechanics; Fluid–structure interaction; Fractional flow reserve; Myocardial ischemia; Plaque stability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31053979     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01611-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

1.  Influence of stenosis morphology on flow through severely stenotic vessels: implications for plaque rupture.

Authors:  J S Stroud; S A Berger; D Saloner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Problems of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  J I Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  3D critical plaque wall stress is a better predictor of carotid plaque rupture sites than flow shear stress: An in vivo MRI-based 3D FSI study.

Authors:  Zhongzhao Teng; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan; Marina Ferguson; Chun Yang; Xueying Huang; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Dalin Tang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  CONTROL OF CORONARY BLOOD FLOW BY AN AUTOREGULATORY MECHANISM.

Authors:  P MOSHER; J ROSS; P A MCFATE; R F SHAW
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Functional measurement of coronary stenosis.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Jan-Willem E M Sels
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Influence of residual stress/strain on the biomechanical stability of vulnerable coronary plaques: potential impact for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture.

Authors:  Jacques Ohayon; Olivier Dubreuil; Philippe Tracqui; Simon Le Floc'h; Gilles Rioufol; Lara Chalabreysse; Françoise Thivolet; Roderic I Pettigrew; Gérard Finet
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Mechanical stresses in carotid plaques using MRI-based fluid-structure interaction models.

Authors:  Samuel A Kock; Jens V Nygaard; Nikolaj Eldrup; Ernst-Torben Fründ; Anette Klaerke; William P Paaske; Erling Falk; W Yong Kim
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The diastolic flow-pressure gradient relation in coronary stenoses in humans.

Authors:  Koen M J Marques; Hugo J Spruijt; Christa Boer; Nico Westerhof; Cees A Visser; Frans C Visser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Marcel van' t Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; William F Fearon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  3D MRI-based anisotropic FSI models with cyclic bending for human coronary atherosclerotic plaque mechanical analysis.

Authors:  Dalin Tang; Chun Yang; Shunichi Kobayashi; Jie Zheng; Pamela K Woodard; Zhongzhao Teng; Kristen Billiar; Richard Bach; David N Ku
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Gabriel T R Pereira; Luis A P Dallan; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire; Joachim Lotz
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  The association between intravascular ultrasound-derived echo-attenuation and quantitative flow ratio in intermediate coronary lesions.

Authors:  Liang Geng; Yuan Yuan; Peizhao Du; Liming Gao; Yunkai Wang; Jiming Li; Wei Guo; Ying Huang; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12

3.  Impact of coronary plaque morphology on the precision of computational fractional flow reserve derived from optical coherence tomography imaging.

Authors:  Xiaoling Zeng; Emil Nielsen Holck; Jelmer Westra; Fukang Hu; Jiayue Huang; Hiroki Emori; Takashi Kubo; William Wijns; Lianglong Chen; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-04

4.  Accurate Calculation of FFR Based on a Physics-Driven Fluid-Structure Interaction Model.

Authors:  Xiaolu Xi; Jincheng Liu; Hao Sun; Ke Xu; Xue Wang; Liyuan Zhang; Tianming Du; Jian Liu; Bao Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.