Joseph Brent Muhlestein1, Fidela Ll Moreno2. 1. Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 S. Cottonwood Street, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. JBrent.Muhlestein@imail.org. 2. Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 S. Cottonwood Street, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is well known that there is a very high risk of cardiovascular complications among diabetic patients. In spite of all efforts at aggressive control of diabetes and its complications, the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remains high, including in patients with no prior symptoms, underscoring a possible advantage for appropriate screening of asymptomatic patients for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). In this article, we sought primarily to review the results of studies designed to evaluate a possible role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the screening of asymptomatic diabetic patients for possible obstructive CAD. RECENT FINDINGS: Our review of current literature indicates that there is still no method of CAD screening identified that has been shown to reduce the cardiovascular risk of asymptomatic diabetic patients. Therefore, the utility and value of screening for CAD in asymptomatic diabetic patients remains controversial. CCTA screening has shown promise and has been demonstrated to predict future risk, but as yet has not demonstrated improvement in the outcomes of these high-risk patients. At our present state of knowledge, aggressive risk factor reduction appears to be the most important primary prevention strategy for all asymptomatic high-risk diabetic patients. However, there remains a great need for better and more sensitive and specific screening methods, as well as more effective treatments that may allow us to more accurately target diabetic patients who really are at high risk. Further large randomized and well-controlled clinical trials may be necessary to determine whether screening for CAD can reduce cardiovascular event rates in patients with diabetes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is well known that there is a very high risk of cardiovascular complications among diabeticpatients. In spite of all efforts at aggressive control of diabetes and its complications, the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remains high, including in patients with no prior symptoms, underscoring a possible advantage for appropriate screening of asymptomatic patients for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). In this article, we sought primarily to review the results of studies designed to evaluate a possible role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the screening of asymptomatic diabeticpatients for possible obstructive CAD. RECENT FINDINGS: Our review of current literature indicates that there is still no method of CAD screening identified that has been shown to reduce the cardiovascular risk of asymptomatic diabeticpatients. Therefore, the utility and value of screening for CAD in asymptomatic diabeticpatients remains controversial. CCTA screening has shown promise and has been demonstrated to predict future risk, but as yet has not demonstrated improvement in the outcomes of these high-risk patients. At our present state of knowledge, aggressive risk factor reduction appears to be the most important primary prevention strategy for all asymptomatic high-risk diabeticpatients. However, there remains a great need for better and more sensitive and specific screening methods, as well as more effective treatments that may allow us to more accurately target diabeticpatients who really are at high risk. Further large randomized and well-controlled clinical trials may be necessary to determine whether screening for CAD can reduce cardiovascular event rates in patients with diabetes.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan C Kwan; Heidi T May; George Cater; Christopher T Sibley; Boaz D Rosen; João A C Lima; Karen Rodriguez; Donald L Lappe; Joseph B Muhlestein; Jeffrey L Anderson; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Joseph B Muhlestein; Donald L Lappé; Joao A C Lima; Boaz D Rosen; Heidi T May; Stacey Knight; David A Bluemke; Steven R Towner; Viet Le; Tami L Bair; Andrea L Vavere; Jeffrey L Anderson Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Gregory J Dehmer; John W Hirshfeld; Peter K Smith; John A Spertus Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hertzel C Gerstein; Michael E Miller; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; J Thomas Bigger; John B Buse; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Denise G Simons-Morton; William T Friedewald Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert L Frye; Phyllis August; Maria Mori Brooks; Regina M Hardison; Sheryl F Kelsey; Joan M MacGregor; Trevor J Orchard; Bernard R Chaitman; Saul M Genuth; Suzanne H Goldberg; Mark A Hlatky; Teresa L Z Jones; Mark E Molitch; Richard W Nesto; Edward Y Sako; Burton E Sobel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lawrence H Young; Frans J Th Wackers; Deborah A Chyun; Janice A Davey; Eugene J Barrett; Raymond Taillefer; Gary V Heller; Ami E Iskandrian; Steven D Wittlin; Neil Filipchuk; Robert E Ratner; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 56.272