Literature DB >> 23559588

Impact of 18F-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: influence of androgen deprivation therapy and correlation with PSA kinetics.

Mohsen Beheshti1, Silke Haim, Rasoul Zakavi, Martin Steinmair, Peter Waldenberger, Thomas Kunit, Michael Nader, Werner Langsteger, Wolfgang Loidl.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the potential of (18)F-fluoromethyldimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium (FCH) PET/CT in the detection of recurrent disease or distant metastases and correlated its diagnostic accuracy with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in prostate cancer patients with biochemical evidence of recurrence. Furthermore, the influences of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and its duration on (18)F-FCH PET were assessed in this study.
METHODS: This prospective study included 250 prostate cancer patients with PSA relapse who underwent (18)F-FCH PET/CT. At the time of (18)F-FCH PET/CT imaging, the mean PSA level was 46.9 ± 314.7 ng/mL and 55.2% (138/250) of patients were receiving ADT. Overall, ADT was performed on 67.2% (168/250) of patients after initial treatment. Imaging was performed on an integrated PET/CT system. Acquisition started 1 min after intravenous injection of (18)F-FCH (4.07 MBq/kg of body weight) with dynamic PET images in the pelvic region during 8 min (1 min/frame) followed by a static semi-whole-body acquisition. The final diagnosis of positive PET lesions was based on histopathology or a consensus of clinical findings, additional imaging, or follow-up imaging modalities.
RESULTS: (18)F-FCH PET/CT was able to correctly detect malignant lesions in 74% (185/250) of patients but was negative in 26% (65/250). In 28% of patients, only 1 lesion was detected (69/250); from these, 65.2% (45 patients) had a local recurrence, 18.8% (13 patients) a single lymph node, and 15.9% (11 patients) a solitary bone metastasis. The sensitivity of the (18)F-FCH PET was significantly higher (P = 0.001) in patients with ongoing ADT (85%; confidence interval, 80%-91%) than in patients without ADT (59.5%; confidence interval, 50%-69%). (18)F-FCH PET sensitivity was 77.5%, 80.7%, 85.2%, and 92.8% for the trigger PSA levels of more than 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 ng/mL, respectively. Scan sensitivity was 33% in patients with a trigger PSA level of less than 0.3 ng/mL and 77% in patients with a trigger PSA level of greater than 0.3 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.001). Using a binary logistic regression analysis model, we showed trigger PSA and ADT to be the only significant predictors of positive PET findings.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FCH PET/CT proved its potential as a noninvasive 1-stop diagnostic modality enabling us to correctly detect occult disease in 74% of patients and to differentiate localized from systemic disease. In patients with biochemical recurrence, it also guides to an optimal treatment approach after initial treatment. Trigger PSA and ADT are the 2 significant predictors of (18)F-FCH-positive PET lesions. ADT seems not to impair (18)F-FCH uptake in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-choline PET/CT; PSA kinetics; androgen deprivation therapy; prostate cancer recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23559588     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.110148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  37 in total

1.  Writing PET into existence.

Authors:  A Chiti; M Kirienko; E Incerti; M Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Clinical and research applications of simultaneous positron emission tomography and MRI.

Authors:  F Fraioli; S Punwani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Advances in medical imaging for the diagnosis and management of common genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Imaging of prostate cancer with PET/CT using (18)F-Fluorocholine.

Authors:  Reza Vali; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Werner Langesteger; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 6.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Is the detection rate of 18F-choline PET/CT influenced by androgen-deprivation therapy?

Authors:  Sotirios Chondrogiannis; Maria Cristina Marzola; Alice Ferretti; Gaia Grassetto; Anna Margherita Maffione; Lucia Rampin; Stefano Fanti; Francesco Giammarile; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Salvage extended field or involved field nodal irradiation in 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT oligorecurrent nodal failures from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexis Lépinoy; Yannick E Silva; Etienne Martin; Aurélie Bertaut; Magali Quivrin; Léone Aubignac; Alexandre Cochet; Gilles Créhange
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  BAY 1075553 PET-CT for Staging and Restaging Prostate Cancer Patients: Comparison with [18F] Fluorocholine PET-CT (Phase I Study).

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Thomas Kunit; Silke Haim; Rasoul Zakavi; Christian Schiller; Andrew Stephens; Ludger Dinkelborg; Werner Langsteger; Wolfgang Loidl
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.