Literature DB >> 25315836

BAY 1075553 PET-CT for Staging and Restaging Prostate Cancer Patients: Comparison with [18F] Fluorocholine PET-CT (Phase I Study).

Mohsen Beheshti1, Thomas Kunit, Silke Haim, Rasoul Zakavi, Christian Schiller, Andrew Stephens, Ludger Dinkelborg, Werner Langsteger, Wolfgang Loidl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: (2RS,4S)-2-[(18)F]Fluoro-4-phosphonomethyl-pentanedioic acid (BAY1075553) shows increased uptake in prostate cancer cells. We compared the diagnostic potential of positron emission tomography (PET)-X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging using BAY1075553 versus [(18)F]f luorocholine (FCH) PET-CT. PROCEDURES: Twelve prostate cancer patients (nine staging, three re-staging) were included. The mean prostate-specific antigen in the primary staging and re-staging groups was 21.5 ± 12 and 73.6 ± 33 ng/ml, respectively. Gleason score ranged from 5-9. In nine patients imaged for pre-operative staging, the median Gleason score was 8 (range, 7-9). PET acquisition started with dynamic PET images in the pelvic region followed by static whole-body acquisition. The patients were monitored for 5-8 days afterward for adverse events.
RESULTS: There were no relevant changes in laboratory values or physical examination. Urinary bladder wall received the largest dose equivalent 0.12 mSv/MBq. The whole-body mean effective dose was 0.015 mSv/MBq. There was a significant correlation between detected prostatic lesions by the two imaging modalities (Kappa = 0.356, P < 0.001) and no significant difference in sensitivity (P = 0.16) and specificity (P = 0.41). The sensitivity and specificity of PET imaging using BAY1075553 for lymph node (LN) staging was 42.9 % and 100 %, while it was 81.2 % and 50 % using FCH. The two modalities were closely correlated regarding detection of LNs and bone metastases, although BAY1075553 failed to detect a bone marrow metastasis. Degenerative bone lesions often displayed intense uptake of BAY1075553.
CONCLUSIONS: BAY1075553 PET-CT produced no adverse effects, was well tolerated, and detected primary and metastatic prostate cancer. FCH PET-CT results were superior, however, with respect to detecting LN and bone marrow metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25315836     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-014-0800-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  45 in total

1.  18F choline PET/CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Larisa Imamovic; Gabriele Broinger; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Franz Stoiber; Michael Nader; Bernhard Gruy; Guenter Janetschek; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  State of the art and challenges of time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 4.  PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Ronnie C Mease; Catherine A Foss; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer: initial experience.

Authors:  Daniel T Schmid; Hubert John; Roland Zweifel; Tibor Cservenyak; Gerrit Westera; Gerhard W Goerres; Gustav K von Schulthess; Thomas F Hany
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Expression of glutamate carboxypeptidase II in human brain.

Authors:  P Sácha; J Zámecník; C Barinka; K Hlouchová; A Vícha; P Mlcochová; I Hilgert; T Eckschlager; J Konvalinka
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012.

Authors:  J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Constitutive and antibody-induced internalization of prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  H Liu; A K Rajasekaran; P Moy; Y Xia; S Kim; V Navarro; R Rahmati; N H Bander
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross; Christine E Sheehan; Hugh A G Fisher; Ronald P Kaufman; Prabhjot Kaur; Karen Gray; Iain Webb; Gary S Gray; Rebecca Mosher; Bhaskar V S Kallakury
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Marino Cimitan; Roberto Bortolus; Sandro Morassut; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Antonio Garbeglio; Tanja Baresic; Eugenio Borsatti; Annalisa Drigo; Mauro G Trovò
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT and PET/MRI: Current and Future Applications.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Matthias Eiber; Louise Emmett; Wolfgang P Fendler; Courtney Lawhn-Heath; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Lymph node staging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandeep Sankineni; Anna M Brown; Michele Fascelli; Yan Mee Law; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted theranostics: past, present, and future approaches.

Authors:  Nathan M Hawkey; Alton O Sartor; Michael J Morris; Andrew J Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-04

Review 4.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiohalogenated PET and Therapeutic Agents for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier; Markus Dietlein; Michael A Gorin; Michael R Zalutsky; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen as a target for cancer imaging and therapy.

Authors:  A P Kiess; S R Banerjee; R C Mease; S P Rowe; A Rao; C A Foss; Y Chen; X Yang; S Y Cho; S Nimmagadda; M G Pomper
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.346

6.  Towards Personalized Treatment of Prostate Cancer: PSMA I&T, a Promising Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Theranostic Agent.

Authors:  Kristell L S Chatalic; Sandra Heskamp; Mark Konijnenberg; Janneke D M Molkenboer-Kuenen; Gerben M Franssen; Marian C Clahsen-van Groningen; Margret Schottelius; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Wytske M van Weerden; Otto C Boerman; Marion de Jong
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 7.  Target Definition in Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: The Role of Advanced Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Gaël Amzalag; Olivier Rager; Claire Tabouret-Viaud; Michael Wissmeyer; Electra Sfakianaki; Thomas de Perrot; Osman Ratib; Raymond Miralbell; Giampiero Giovacchini; Valentina Garibotto; Thomas Zilli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  18F-Labeled, PSMA-Targeted Radiotracers: Leveraging the Advantages of Radiofluorination for Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Thorsten Derlin; Constantin Lapa; Sara Sheikbahaei; Takahiro Higuchi; Frederik L Giesel; Spencer Behr; Alexander Drzezga; Hiroyuki Kimura; Andreas K Buck; Frank M Bengel; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.