OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to identify baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with work productivity in depressed outpatients and to assess the effect of treatment on work productivity. METHOD: Employed depressed outpatients 18-75 years old who completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scale (N=1,928) were treated with citalopram (20-40 mg/day) in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study. For patients who did not remit after an initial adequate antidepressant trial (level 1), either a switch to sertraline, sustained-release bupropion, or extended-release venlafaxine or an augmentation with sustained-release bupropion or buspirone was provided (level 2). Participants' clinical and demographic characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed for associations with baseline work productivity and change in productivity over time. RESULTS: Education, baseline depression severity, and melancholic, atypical, and recurrent depression subtypes were all independently associated with lower benefit to work productivity domains. During level 1 treatment, work productivity in several domains improved with reductions in depressive symptom severity. However, these findings did not hold true for level 2 outcomes; there was no significant association between treatment response and reduction in work impairment. Results were largely confirmed when multiple imputations were employed to address missing data. During this additional analysis, an association was also observed between greater impairment in work productivity and higher levels of anxious depression. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinically significant reductions in symptom severity during initial treatment were more likely than nonresponders to experience significant improvements in work productivity. In contrast, patients who achieved symptom remission in second-step treatment continued to have impairment at work. Patients who have demonstrated some degree of treatment resistance are more prone to persistent impairment in occupational productivity, implying a need for additional, possibly novel, treatments.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to identify baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with work productivity in depressed outpatients and to assess the effect of treatment on work productivity. METHOD: Employed depressed outpatients 18-75 years old who completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scale (N=1,928) were treated with citalopram (20-40 mg/day) in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study. For patients who did not remit after an initial adequate antidepressant trial (level 1), either a switch to sertraline, sustained-release bupropion, or extended-release venlafaxine or an augmentation with sustained-release bupropion or buspirone was provided (level 2). Participants' clinical and demographic characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed for associations with baseline work productivity and change in productivity over time. RESULTS: Education, baseline depression severity, and melancholic, atypical, and recurrent depression subtypes were all independently associated with lower benefit to work productivity domains. During level 1 treatment, work productivity in several domains improved with reductions in depressive symptom severity. However, these findings did not hold true for level 2 outcomes; there was no significant association between treatment response and reduction in work impairment. Results were largely confirmed when multiple imputations were employed to address missing data. During this additional analysis, an association was also observed between greater impairment in work productivity and higher levels of anxious depression. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with clinically significant reductions in symptom severity during initial treatment were more likely than nonresponders to experience significant improvements in work productivity. In contrast, patients who achieved symptom remission in second-step treatment continued to have impairment at work. Patients who have demonstrated some degree of treatment resistance are more prone to persistent impairment in occupational productivity, implying a need for additional, possibly novel, treatments.
Authors: Debra Lerner; David A Adler; William H Rogers; Hong Chang; Annabel Greenhill; Elina Cymerman; Francisca Azocar Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Megha M Vasavada; Amber M Leaver; Stephanie Njau; Shantanu H Joshi; Linda Ercoli; Gerhard Hellemann; Katherine L Narr; Randall Espinoza Journal: J ECT Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.635
Authors: Jennifer B Dwyer; Argyris Stringaris; David A Brent; Michael H Bloch Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: David A Adler; Debra Lerner; Zachary L Visco; Annabel Greenhill; Hong Chang; Elina Cymerman; Francisca Azocar; William H Rogers Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Manish K Jha; Abu Minhajuddin; Tracy L Greer; Thomas Carmody; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Waguih William IsHak; David M James; James Mirocha; Haidy Youssef; Gabriel Tobia; Sarah Pi; Katherine L Collison; Robert M Cohen Journal: Ther Adv Chronic Dis Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 5.091
Authors: Emma Morton; Venkat Bhat; Peter Giacobbe; Wendy Lou; Erin E Michalak; Shane McInerney; Trisha Chakrabarty; Benicio N Frey; Roumen V Milev; Daniel J Müller; Sagar V Parikh; Susan Rotzinger; Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 5.749