Literature DB >> 33860922

Predictors of Quality of Life Improvement with Escitalopram and Adjunctive Aripiprazole in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A CAN-BIND Study Report.

Emma Morton1, Venkat Bhat2, Peter Giacobbe2, Wendy Lou3, Erin E Michalak4, Shane McInerney2,5, Trisha Chakrabarty4, Benicio N Frey6, Roumen V Milev7, Daniel J Müller2, Sagar V Parikh8, Susan Rotzinger2, Sidney H Kennedy2, Raymond W Lam4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-response to first-line treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) is common; for such individuals, quality of life (QoL) impairments can be severe. Identifying predictors of QoL changes may support the management of cases with persistent depressive symptoms despite adequate initial pharmacological/psychological treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to explore predictors of domain-specific QoL improvement following adjunctive aripiprazole treatment for inadequate response to initial antidepressant therapy.
METHODS: We evaluated secondary QoL outcomes from a CAN-BIND (Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression) study in patients with MDD who did not respond to an initial 8 weeks of escitalopram and received a further 8 weeks of adjunctive aripiprazole (n = 96). Physical, psychological, social, and environmental QoL domains were assessed using the World Health Organization QoL Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF). Clinician-rated depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Functioning was measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Satisfaction with medication was assessed with a single item from the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Exploratory t-tests were used to describe domain score changes. A hierarchical linear regression was used to explore demographic, clinical, and treatment-related predictors of improvement.
RESULTS: Across domains, QoL improved with adjunctive aripiprazole treatment. Satisfaction with medication and MADRS and SDS scores similarly improved. Symptom reduction was a predictor for positive change to physical and psychological QoL; functioning improvements were predictive of increases to all QoL domains. Satisfaction with medication predicted improvements to physical and psychological domains, whereas number of medication trials was a predictor of worsening QoL in the physical domain.
CONCLUSION: The final model explained the most variance in psychological (68%) and physical (67%) QoL. Less variance was explained for environmental (43%) and social QoL (33%), highlighting a need for further exploration of predictors in these domains. Strategies such as functional remediation may have potential to support QoL for individuals with persistent depressive symptoms. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT016557.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33860922     DOI: 10.1007/s40263-021-00803-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  64 in total

Review 1.  The CANMAT task force recommendations for the management of patients with mood disorders and comorbid medical conditions: diagnostic, assessment, and treatment principles.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Serge Beaulieu; Valerie H Taylor; Ayal Schaffer; Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.567

Review 2.  Social functioning in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kupferberg; Lucy Bicks; Gregor Hasler
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  How should remission from depression be defined? The depressed patient's perspective.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Joseph B McGlinchey; Michael A Posternak; Michael Friedman; Naureen Attiullah; Daniela Boerescu
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Severity of depression and magnitude of productivity loss.

Authors:  Arne Beck; A Lauren Crain; Leif I Solberg; Jürgen Unützer; Russell E Glasgow; Michael V Maciosek; Robin Whitebird
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Work functioning in persons with depressive and anxiety disorders: the role of specific psychopathological characteristics.

Authors:  I Plaisier; A T F Beekman; R de Graaf; J H Smit; R van Dyck; B W J H Penninx
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  The prevalence and burden of bipolar disorder: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors:  Alize J Ferrari; Emily Stockings; Jon-Paul Khoo; Holly E Erskine; Louisa Degenhardt; Theo Vos; Harvey A Whiteford
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 7.  Global variation in the prevalence and incidence of major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature.

Authors:  A J Ferrari; A J Somerville; A J Baxter; R Norman; S B Patten; T Vos; H A Whiteford
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 8.  Nonresponse, partial response, and failure to achieve remission: humanistic and cost burden in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Josephine A Mauskopf; Gregory E Simon; Anupama Kalsekar; Christian Nimsch; Eduardo Dunayevich; Ann Cameron
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.505

9.  Treatment effectiveness and tolerability outcomes that are most important to individuals with bipolar and unipolar depression.

Authors:  Joshua D Rosenblat; Gregory E Simon; Gary S Sachs; Ingrid Deetz; Allen Doederlein; Denisse DePeralta; Mary Mischka Dean; Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Social networks of patients with chronic depression: A systematic review.

Authors:  Chiara Visentini; Megan Cassidy; Victoria Jane Bird; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.