Jennifer B Dwyer1,2, Argyris Stringaris3, David A Brent4,5, Michael H Bloch1,6. 1. Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. Yale Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Mood Brain and Development Unit, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Western Psychiatric Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 6. Yale Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant health problem, associated with substantial morbidity, cost, and mortality. Depression is a significant risk factor for suicide, which is now the second leading cause of death in young people. Up to twenty per cent of adolescents will experience MDD before adulthood, and while a substantial proportion will improve with standard-of-care treatments (psychotherapy and medication), roughly one third will not. METHODS: Here, we have reviewed the literature in order to discuss the concept of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in adolescence, examine risk factors, diagnostic difficulties, and challenges in evaluating symptom improvement, and providing guidance on how to define adequate medication and psychotherapy treatment trials. RESULTS: We propose a staging model for adolescent TRD and review the treatment literature. The evidence base for first- and second-line treatments primarily derives from four large pediatric clinical trials (TADS, TORDIA, ADAPT, and IMPACT). After two medications and a trial of evidence-based psychotherapy have failed to alleviate depressive symptoms, the evidence becomes quite thin for subsequent treatments. Here, we review the evidence for the effectiveness of medication switches, medication augmentation, psychotherapy augmentation, and interventional treatments (i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, and ketamine) for adolescent TRD. Comparisons are drawn to the adult TRD literature, and areas for future pediatric depression research are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: As evidence is limited for treatments in this population, a careful consideration of the known risks and side effects of escalated treatments (e.g., mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics) is warranted and weighed against potential, but often untested, benefits.
BACKGROUND: Adolescent major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant health problem, associated with substantial morbidity, cost, and mortality. Depression is a significant risk factor for suicide, which is now the second leading cause of death in young people. Up to twenty per cent of adolescents will experience MDD before adulthood, and while a substantial proportion will improve with standard-of-care treatments (psychotherapy and medication), roughly one third will not. METHODS: Here, we have reviewed the literature in order to discuss the concept of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in adolescence, examine risk factors, diagnostic difficulties, and challenges in evaluating symptom improvement, and providing guidance on how to define adequate medication and psychotherapy treatment trials. RESULTS: We propose a staging model for adolescent TRD and review the treatment literature. The evidence base for first- and second-line treatments primarily derives from four large pediatric clinical trials (TADS, TORDIA, ADAPT, and IMPACT). After two medications and a trial of evidence-based psychotherapy have failed to alleviate depressive symptoms, the evidence becomes quite thin for subsequent treatments. Here, we review the evidence for the effectiveness of medication switches, medication augmentation, psychotherapy augmentation, and interventional treatments (i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, and ketamine) for adolescent TRD. Comparisons are drawn to the adult TRD literature, and areas for future pediatric depression research are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: As evidence is limited for treatments in this population, a careful consideration of the known risks and side effects of escalated treatments (e.g., mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics) is warranted and weighed against potential, but often untested, benefits.
Authors: John R Weisz; Sofie Kuppens; Mei Yi Ng; Dikla Eckshtain; Ana M Ugueto; Rachel Vaughn-Coaxum; Amanda Jensen-Doss; Kristin M Hawley; Lauren S Krumholz Marchette; Brian C Chu; V Robin Weersing; Samantha R Fordwood Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2017 Feb-Mar
Authors: Harold A Sackeim; Scott T Aaronson; Mark T Bunker; Charles R Conway; Mark A Demitrack; Mark S George; Joan Prudic; Michael E Thase; A John Rush Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Ian M Goodyer; Shirley Reynolds; Barbara Barrett; Sarah Byford; Bernadka Dubicka; Jonathan Hill; Fiona Holland; Raphael Kelvin; Nick Midgley; Chris Roberts; Rob Senior; Mary Target; Barry Widmer; Paul Wilkinson; Peter Fonagy Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Rebecca Mortazavi; Maria Lalouni; Rebecca Grudin; Eva Serlachius; Carl Johan Sundberg; Jessica Norrbom; Ingrid Larsson; Emma Haglund; Andreas Ivarsson; Fabian Lenhard; Tina Cronqvist; Kristina Ingemarsson; Åsa Mårsell; Olof Rask; Håkan Jarbin Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Jay Vankawala; Garrett Naples; Victor J Avila-Quintero; Karina L Ramírez; José M Flores; Michael H Bloch; Jennifer B Dwyer Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Jeffrey R Strawn; Ethan A Poweleit; Chakradhara Rao S Uppugunduri; Laura B Ramsey Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Bhedita J Seewoo; Jennifer Rodger; Mark A Demitrack; Karen L Heart; John D Port; Jeffrey R Strawn; Paul E Croarkin Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Paul E Croarkin; Ahmed Z Elmaadawi; Scott T Aaronson; G Randolph Schrodt; Richard C Holbert; Sarah Verdoliva; Karen L Heart; Mark A Demitrack; Jeffrey R Strawn Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 7.853