Literature DB >> 23553118

Excessive femoral offset does not affect the range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.

Shinya Hayashi1, Takayuki Nishiyama, Takaaki Fujishiro, Shingo Hashimoto, Noriyuki Kanzaki, Kotaro Nishida, Ryosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Kurosaka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implant dislocations are often caused by implant or bone impingement, and less impingement is critical to prevent dislocations. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of the femoral offset in avoiding component or bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients underwent THA with a Pinnacle cup and Summit stem (DePuy). Intraoperative kinematic analysis was performed with a navigation system, which was used to obtain intraoperative range of motion (ROM) measurements during trial insertion of stems of two different offset lengths with the same head size. Further, ROM was also measured after actual component insertion.
RESULTS: Maximal ROM was independent of the femoral offset of the stem in each patient. However, the range of external rotation was significantly greater in patients with a greater femoral offset.
CONCLUSIONS: The Summit stem has enough offset length to avoid implant/bone impingement, even when the standard offset stem is used. Nevertheless, selection of the offset stem should be performed carefully to prevent offset complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23553118      PMCID: PMC3685658          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1881-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; R M Lodwig; D J Schurman; A G Hodgson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B F Morrey
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components.

Authors:  R J Krushell; D W Burke; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships.

Authors:  R C Johnston; R A Brand; R D Crowninshield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry.

Authors:  D R Chandler; R Glousman; D Hull; P J McGuire; I S Kim; I C Clarke; A Sarmiento
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention.

Authors:  D E McCollum; W J Gray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D P Sakalkale; P F Sharkey; K Eng; W J Hozack; R H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Y Woo; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Marius von Knoch; Cathy D Schleck; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Obese patients may have more soft tissue impingement following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Takayuki Nishiyama; Takaaki Fujishiro; Shingo Hashimoto; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Kotaro Nishida; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  3 in total

1.  Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Benjamin Buecking; Christoph Kolja Boese; Verena Anna Bergmeister; Michael Frink; Steffen Ruchholtz; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effect of screw fixation on acetabular component alignment change in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takaaki Fujishiro; Shinya Hayashi; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Shingo Hashimoto; Nao Shibanuma; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Christian Merle; Danyal H Nawabi; Sebastian Dendorfer; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.