Literature DB >> 1157408

Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus.

H C Amstutz, R M Lodwig, D J Schurman, A G Hodgson.   

Abstract

Significant differences in ROM exist between different THR prosthesis designs: several of the prosthesis designs tested are marginal in flexion; several millimeters of socket wear will decrease the ROM. The results also emphasize the importance of proper component orientation at surgery. The surgeon has less latitude in orienting the components of a THR with limited ROM. Subluxation and dislocation due to rim contact can be minimized with most prosthetic units by instructing the patients to abduct and/or externally rotate their hips during acute flexion. Analyses suggest that impingement of prosthesis neck and socket rim may lead to increased risk of dislocation and increased rim wear. Prostheses with adequate ROM for everyday activities should provide stability, less frequent neck and socket contact with decreased rim wear, less force transmission to acrylic-bone interface, and less diminution of ROM with wear of the socket wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1157408     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197509000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Implementing capsule representation in a total hip dislocation finite element model.

Authors:  Kristofer J Stewart; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2004

2.  Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?

Authors:  Adrian Bauze; Somen Agrawal; Alana Cuthbert; Richard de Steiger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear.

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

4.  Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA.

Authors:  Akinobu Matsushita; Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanori Fujii; Taishi Sato; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; Jacob M Elkins; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

6.  Cause of irreducible dislocation of a re-revision THR.

Authors:  Evelyn Patricia Murphy; Christopher Fenelon; Shane Russell; Finbarr Condon
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-04

7.  Impingement in Total Hip Replacement: Mechanisms and Consequences.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Curr Orthop       Date:  2008-12-01

8.  Femoroacetabular impingement predisposes to traumatic posterior hip dislocation.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Christoph E Albers; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  F D'Angelo; L Murena; G Zatti; P Cherubino
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Computerized virtual surgery demonstrates where acetabular rim osteophytes most reduce range of motion following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastian Rodriguez-Elizalde; Alyssa M Yeager; Bheeshma Ravi; Joseph D Lipman; Eduardo A Salvati; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.