Literature DB >> 23337290

Prevalence of cam and pincer-type deformities on hip MRI in an asymptomatic young Swiss female population: a cross-sectional study.

M Leunig1, P Jüni, S Werlen, A Limacher, E Nüesch, C W Pfirrmann, S Trelle, A Odermatt, W Hofstetter, R Ganz, S Reichenbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Femoroacetabular impingement is proposed to cause early osteoarthritis (OA) in the non-dysplastic hip. We previously reported on the prevalence of femoral deformities in a young asymptomatic male population. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of both femoral and acetabular types of impingement in young females.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of asymptomatic young females. All participants completed a set of questionnaires and underwent clinical examination of the hip. A random sample was subsequently invited to obtain magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the hip. All MRIs were read for cam-type deformities, increased acetabular depths, labral lesions, and impingement pits. Prevalence estimates of cam-type deformities and increased acetabular depths were estimated, and relationships between deformities and signs of joint damage were examined using logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The study included 283 subjects, and 80 asymptomatic females with a mean age of 19.3 years attended MRI. Fifteen showed some evidence of cam-type deformities, but none were scored to be definite. The overall prevalence was therefore 0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0-5%]. The prevalence of increased acetabular depth was 10% (95% CI 5-19). No association was found between increased acetabular depth and decreased internal rotation of the hip. Increased acetabular depth was not associated with signs of labral damage.
CONCLUSIONS: Definite cam-type deformities in women are rare compared to men, whereas the prevalence of increased acetabular depth is higher, suggesting that femoroacetabular impingement has different gender-related biomechanical mechanisms.
Copyright © 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23337290     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  23 in total

1.  Rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy and labral repair in a high school football athlete.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  New perspectives on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Asheesh Bedi; Freddie Fu; Jon Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Incidence of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Surgical Management Trends Over Time.

Authors:  Rena F Hale; Heath P Melugin; Jun Zhou; Matthew D LaPrade; Christopher Bernard; Devin Leland; Bruce A Levy; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Miguel Castro; Lennart Jans; Rui M Marques; Nélia Gouveia; Francisco Soldado; Olufemi R Ayeni; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Preliminary evaluation of an MRI-based technique for displaying and quantifying bony deformities in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Xiumei Kang; Honglin Zhang; Donald Garbuz; David R Wilson; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Femoroacetabular Impingement: Prevalent and Often Asymptomatic in Older Men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Neeta Parimi; Felix Liu; Sonia Lee; Pia M Jungmann; Michael C Nevitt; Thomas M Link; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is Internal Rotation Measurement of the Hip Useful for Ruling in Cam or Pincer Morphology in Asymptomatic Males? A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Roger Hilfiker; Marc Hunkeler; Andreas Limacher; Michael Leunig; Harald Bonel; Matthias Egger; Peter Jüni; Stephan Reichenbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Defining "Normal" Static and Dynamic Spinopelvic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jeroen C F Verhaegen; Moritz Innmann; Nuno Alves Batista; Charles-Antoine Dion; Isabel Horton; Jim Pierrepont; Christian Merle; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 9.  [Femoral neck stress fractures and femoroacetabular impingement : A retrospective case study and literature review].

Authors:  Lea Franken; Jens Goronzy; O O Olusile; Pablo Ariel Slullitel; Sophia Blum; Jörg Nowotny; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Acetabular Cartilage Thickness Differs Among Cam, Pincer, or Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Descriptive Study Using In Vivo Ultrasonic Measurements During Surgical Hip Dislocation.

Authors:  Simon Damian Steppacher; Malin Kristin Meier; Christoph Emanuel Albers; Moritz Tannast; Klaus Arno Siebenrock
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.