Literature DB >> 19341925

Evaluation of a computed tomography-based navigation system prototype for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of femoroacetabular cam impingement.

Alexander Brunner1, Monika Horisberger, Richard F Herzog.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a new computed tomography-based computer navigation system on the accuracy of arthroscopic offset correction in patients with cam type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and to evaluate if the accuracy of offset restoration compromises the early clinical outcome.
METHODS: We prospectively treated 50 patients (25 navigated and 25 non-navigated) by hip arthroscopy and arthroscopic offset restoration for cam FAI. The patients were a mean age 42.9 years, and the average follow-up was 26.7 months, with no patients lost to follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively. A postoperative alpha angle of less than 50 degrees or a reduction of the alpha angle of more than 20 degrees was considered to be successful offset restoration. Outcomes were measured with a visual analogue scale for pain, range of motion, and the nonarthritic hip score.
RESULTS: The mean alpha angle improved from 76.5 degrees (range, 57 degrees to 110 degrees) to 54.2 degrees (range, 40 degrees to 84 degrees). In both the navigated and the non-navigated groups, 6 patients (24%) showed insufficient offset correction. Range of motion, visual analogue scale for pain scores, and nonarthritic hip scores significantly improved in all subgroups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference regarding the clinical outcome between patients with sufficient and insufficient correction of the alpha angle.
CONCLUSIONS: In this series, a significant percentage of patients (24%) showed an insufficient correction of the alpha angle after hip arthroscopy for cam FAI. This study shows that the presented navigation system could not improve this rate and that the insufficient accuracy of reduction of the alpha angle does not appear to compromise the early clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341925     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  20 in total

1.  The layer concept: utilization in determining the pain generators, pathology and how structure determines treatment.

Authors:  Peter Draovitch; Jaime Edelstein; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Hip arthroscopy: evolution, current practice and future developments.

Authors:  Emmet J Griffiths; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Dynamic Hip Examination for Assessment of Impingement During Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Renato Locks; Jorge Chahla; Justin J Mitchell; Eduardo Soares; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Application of three dimensional printing in surgery for cam type of femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  Tarun Verma; Abhishek Mishra; Gaurang Agarwal; Lalit Maini
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 5.  Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kowalczuk; M Bhandari; F Farrokhyar; I Wong; M Chahal; S Neely; R Gandhi; O R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Hip arthroscopy: the use of computer assistance.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Denis Nam; Caroline Park; Anil S Ranawat
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-01-03

Review 7.  Radiographic outcomes reporting after arthroscopic management of femoroaceabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ivan Dzaja; Kyle Martin; Jeffrey Kay; Muzammil Memon; Andrew Duong; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  [Femoroacetabular impingement - Update 2019].

Authors:  Andreas Heuck; Michael Dienst; Christian Glaser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Anthony Habib; Chloe E Haldane; Seper Ekhtiari; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Etienne L Belzile; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery-current status and introduction of our system.

Authors:  Klemen Stražar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.