Literature DB >> 26169210

[Listening effort with cochlear implants: Unilateral versus bilateral use].

J Schnabl1, B Bumann, M Rehbein, O Müller, H Seidler, A Wolf-Magele, G Sprinzl, J Windfuhr, V Weichbold.   

Abstract

AIM: The influence of bilateral cochlear implants (CI) and unilateral CI on the self-reported listening effort in standardized situations is being assessed. SAMPLE AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 34 bilateral and 38 unilateral adult CI users. Unilateral CI users had at least severe hearing loss in the non-implanted ear and had been fitted with a hearing aid. The listening effort has been defined as a subjectively perceived effort in understanding a speaker. Patients were administered a customized questionnaire containing nine examples of listening situations with different demands. The listening effort expended in each situation had to be rated on a six-step scale. Answers were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, including the factors "level of background noise," "listening duration," and the covariates "patient age" and "time since CI implantation."
RESULTS: Only the factors "level of background noise" and "listening duration" were significant (p = 0.024 and p = 0.001 respectively). Unilateral versus bilateral CI was not significant (p = 0.17). Nevertheless, bilateral CI users reported a lower degree of listening effort than unilateral users in all of the nine situations asked about in the questionnaire (binomial test: p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: We conclude that bilateral CI use has some effect on reducing listening effort, but compared with unilateral use the effect is possibly not very great.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26169210     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-015-0020-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  10 in total

1.  Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.

Authors:  Anastasios Sarampalis; Sridhar Kalluri; Brent Edwards; Ervin Hafter
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.

Authors:  Penny Anderson Gosselin; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn C Hughes; Karyn L Galvin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-06

4.  Comment from Dr. Arthur Wingfield.

Authors:  Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Heather Cones
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.

Authors:  Jamie L Desjardins; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing-aid profile: comparing self-assessed and measured abilities.

Authors:  William Noble; Richard Tyler; Camille Dunn; Navjot Bhullar
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group 'white paper'.

Authors:  Ronan McGarrigle; Kevin J Munro; Piers Dawes; Andrew J Stewart; David R Moore; Johanna G Barry; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.117

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Bilateral cochlear implants].

Authors:  J Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.