Literature DB >> 26052190

Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices.

Tiago H Falk1, Vijay Parsa2, João F Santos1, Kathryn Arehart3, Oldooz Hazrati4, Rainer Huber5, James M Kates3, Susan Scollie2.   

Abstract

This article presents an overview of twelve existing objective speech quality and intelligibility prediction tools. Two classes of algorithms are presented, namely intrusive and non-intrusive, with the former requiring the use of a reference signal, while the latter does not. Investigated metrics include both those developed for normal hearing listeners, as well as those tailored particularly for hearing impaired (HI) listeners who are users of assistive listening devices (i.e., hearing aids, HAs, and cochlear implants, CIs). Representative examples of those optimized for HI listeners include the speech-to-reverberation modulation energy ratio, tailored to hearing aids (SRMR-HA) and to cochlear implants (SRMR-CI); the modulation spectrum area (ModA); the hearing aid speech quality (HASQI) and perception indices (HASPI); and the PErception MOdel - hearing impairment quality (PEMO-Q-HI). The objective metrics are tested on three subjectively-rated speech datasets covering reverberation-alone, noise-alone, and reverberation-plus-noise degradation conditions, as well as degradations resultant from nonlinear frequency compression and different speech enhancement strategies. The advantages and limitations of each measure are highlighted and recommendations are given for suggested uses of the different tools under specific environmental and processing conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26052190      PMCID: PMC4452133          DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2014.2358871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag        ISSN: 1053-5888            Impact factor:   12.551


  12 in total

1.  Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations.

Authors:  S D Ewert; T Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments.

Authors:  João F Santos; Stefano Cosentino; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Authors:  Vijay Parsa; Susan Scollie; Danielle Glista; Andreas Seelisch
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

5.  On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.

Authors:  David Suelzle; Vijay Parsa; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system.

Authors:  R P Derleth; T Dau; B Kollmeier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model.

Authors:  I Holube; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Predicting the intelligibility of reverberant speech for cochlear implant listeners with a non-intrusive intelligibility measure.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.880

10.  Predicting the perceived sound quality of frequency-compressed speech.

Authors:  Rainer Huber; Vijay Parsa; Susan Scollie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Melinda C Anderson; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Lewis O Harvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.

Authors:  Amin Edraki; Wai-Yip Chan; Jesper Jensen; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-24

3.  Electroacoustic assessment of wireless remote microphone systems.

Authors:  Haniyeh Salehi; Vijay Parsa; Paula Folkeard
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 4.  Modulation Spectral Signal Representation for Quality Measurement and Enhancement of Wearable Device Data: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Abhishek Tiwari; Raymundo Cassani; Shruti Kshirsagar; Diana P Tobon; Yi Zhu; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Predicting Speech Perception in Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Automatic Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Lionel Fontan; Tom Cretin-Maitenaz; Christian Füllgrabe
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Improved Estimation of Parkinsonian Vowel Quality through Acoustic Feature Assimilation.

Authors:  Amr Gaballah; Vijay Parsa; Daryn Cushnie-Sparrow; Scott Adams
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-07-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.