Literature DB >> 2233158

Determining a range of false-positive rates for which ROC curves differ.

D K McClish1.   

Abstract

Many indices have been proposed for summarizing the information contained in the ROC curve. When comparing two ROC curves, though, there are times when global summary measures are either not optimal or not appropriate. The author presents a method for directly comparing true-positive rates for two diagnostic, screening or prognostic tools, determining over what range of false-positive values the tests differ. The method is applicable for independent or dependent samples. An example concerning gallium citrate imaging is presented, as well as an example using a prognostic index for severity of illness in the ICU. The range of false-positive rates for which the ROC curves differ is determined for each example.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2233158     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  1 in total

1.  Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong; Chin-Ying Lai; Albert Vexler
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.111

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.