Literature DB >> 27445642

Density-based empirical likelihood procedures for testing symmetry of data distributions and K-sample comparisons.

Albert Vexler1, Hovig Tanajian1, Alan D Hutson1.   

Abstract

In practice, parametric likelihood-ratio techniques are powerful statistical tools. In this article, we propose and examine novel and simple distribution-free test statistics that efficiently approximate parametric likelihood ratios to analyze and compare distributions of K groups of observations. Using the density-based empirical likelihood methodology, we develop a Stata package that applies to a test for symmetry of data distributions and compares K-sample distributions. Recognizing that recent statistical software packages do not sufficiently address K-sample nonparametric comparisons of data distributions, we propose a new Stata command, vxdbel, to execute exact density-based empirical likelihood-ratio tests using K samples. To calculate p-values of the proposed tests, we use the following methods: 1) a classical technique based on Monte Carlo p-value evaluations; 2) an interpolation technique based on tabulated critical values; and 3) a new hybrid technique that combines methods 1 and 2. The third, cutting-edge method is shown to be very efficient in the context of exact-test p-value computations. This Bayesian-type method considers tabulated critical values as prior information and Monte Carlo generations of test statistic values as data used to depict the likelihood function. In this case, a nonparametric Bayesian method is proposed to compute critical values of exact tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  K-sample comparisons; empirical likelihood; exact tests; likelihood ratio; nonparametric tests; p-value computation; st0338; symmetry; vxdbel

Year:  2014        PMID: 27445642      PMCID: PMC4950999     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stata J        ISSN: 1536-867X            Impact factor:   2.637


  8 in total

1.  Two-sample nonparametric likelihood inference based on incomplete data with an application to a pneumonia study.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Jihnhee Yu; Lili Tian; Shuling Liu
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  The Monte Carlo method.

Authors:  N METROPOLIS; S ULAM
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1949-09       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Optimal Hypothesis Testing: From Semi to Fully Bayes Factors.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Chengqing Wu; Kai Fun Yu
Journal:  Metrika       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 1.057

4.  Discriminating between iron deficiency anemia and anemia of chronic disease using traditional indices of iron status vs transferrin receptor concentration.

Authors:  F H Wians; J E Urban; J H Keffer; S H Kroft
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Two-sample density-based empirical likelihood ratio tests based on paired data, with application to a treatment study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and severe mood dysregulation.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Wan-Min Tsai; Gregory Gurevich; Jihnhee Yu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong; Chin-Ying Lai; Albert Vexler
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.111

7.  An Exact Density-Based Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Paired Data.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Gregory Gurevich; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  Nonparametric Bayes Factors Based On Empirical Likelihood Ratios.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Wei Deng; Gregory E Wilding
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.111

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.