Literature DB >> 16999608

Reducing shock number dramatically decreases lesion size in a juvenile kidney model.

Bret A Connors1, Andrew P Evan, Philip M Blomgren, Lynn R Willis, Rajash K Handa, David A Lifshitz, James E Lingeman, Jun Ying.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Adult stone patients are treated with several thousand lithotripter shockwaves (SWs) in order to pulverize a kidney stone. This typical clinical dose assures that the stone will be fractured completely. However, this same dose induces damage to the kidney, especially pediatric-size kidneys. If increasing SW number is known to increase renal injury and functional impairment, will reducing SW number below typical treatment levels significantly decrease kidney damage and hemodynamic changes?
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To address this question, one kidney in each of nine juvenile pigs (6-7 weeks old) was treated with 1000 SWs at 24 kV directed at a lower-pole calix with an unmodified HM-3 lithotripter. Parenchymal-lesion size was determined by sectioning the entire kidney and quantitating the amount of hemorrhage in each slice. Renal function was determined before and after SW treatment by inulin clearance, paraaminohippurate (PAH) extraction, and PAH clearance. The resulting morphologic and functional changes were then compared with those of kidneys that had been treated with a typical clinical dose of 2000 SWs (data previously published; J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:310). Eleven pigs were utilized as sham-treated controls.
RESULTS: Limiting SW number to 1000 significantly reduced the size of the lesion (by 95%) and reduced the degree of functional change (glomerular filtration rate by 38%, PAH extraction by 73%, renal plasma flow by 46%) compared with kidneys receiving 2000 SWs (an adult dose).
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the idea that SW number should be reduced to the lowest number that fractures kidney stones in order to minimize renal injury and functional impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16999608     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  17 in total

Review 1.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

2.  Quantitative assessment of shockwave lithotripsy accuracy and the effect of respiratory motion.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey; Anup R Shah; Ryan S Hsi; Marla Paun; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Effect of shock wave number on renal oxidative stress and inflammation.

Authors:  Daniel L Clark; Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Rajash K Handa; Sujuan Gao
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James A McAteer; Bret A Connors; Ziyue Liu; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Dual-head lithotripsy in synchronous mode: acute effect on renal function and morphology in the pig.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James A McAteer; Lynn R Willis; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Bret A Connors; Jun Ying; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Effect of high shock number on acute complication development after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Miriam Hadj-Moussa; James A Brown
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  A new electromagnetic shock-wave generator "SLX-F2" with user-selectable dual focus size: ex vivo evaluation of renal injury.

Authors:  Rasmus Leistner; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Rainer Grobholz; Maurice Stephan Michel; Ernst Marlinghaus; Kai Uwe Köhrmann; Peter Alken; Axel Häcker
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-05-05

9.  Renal Vasoconstriction Occurs Early During Shockwave Lithotripsy in Humans.

Authors:  Franklin C Lee; Ryan S Hsi; Mathew D Sorensen; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; Ziyue Liu; Michael Bailey; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves induces renal vasoconstriction during standard shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): a treatment protocol known to reduce SWL-induced renal injury.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Michael R Bailey; Marla Paun; Sujuan Gao; Bret A Connors; Lynn R Willis; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.