Literature DB >> 23528159

A three-arm randomized phase II study of oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine versus oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in sequence versus docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines.

Mario Campone1, Natalya Dobrovolskaya, Serjei Tjulandin, Shin-Chen Chen, Sameul Fourie, Fawzia Mefti, Maria Konstantinova, Florence Lefresne, Nadege Meheust, Jacek Jassem.   

Abstract

Owing to the increased number of patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy, there is a need for new effective and tolerable nonanthracycline regimens in metastatic breast cancer. Patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines in (neo)adjuvant setting were randomized to fully oral 3 weekly cycles of the combination of oral vinorelbine with capecitabine (V + C), to the same drugs alternating every three cycles (V↔C), or to the combination of docetaxel and capecitabine (D + C). V was given at 80 mg/m(2) (after the first cycle at 60 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 in the V + C arm and weekly in the V↔C arm, C at 1,000 mg/m(2) bid from days 1 to 14, and D on day 1 at 75 mg/m(2). The primary end point was disease control rate (CR + PR + NC ≥ 3 months). A total of 139 patients were randomly assigned to V + C (44 patients), V↔C (47 patients), and D + C (48 patients). After an independent review, the disease control rate in the intent-to-treat population in the V + C, V↔C, and D + C arms [95% CI] was 70.5% [54.8-83.2], 37.0% [23.2-52.5], and 70.8% [55.9-83.1], and the median overall survival 22.2, 19.4, and 24.2 months, respectively. When taken into account the disease control rate, the alternating V↔C regimen seems to be less effective compared with V + C or D + C combinations. Combinations of V + C or D + C showed similar efficacy and a different toxicity profile; V + C induced less neutropenia, infection, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue/asthenia, and alopecia, whereas D + C - less gastrointestinal toxicity. V + C combination constitutes a valuable fully oral alternative option to D + C in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines in (neo)adjuvant setting, while offering the advantages of an all-oral treatment.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23528159     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  8 in total

1.  Oral Capecitabine-Vinorelbine is Associated with Longer Overall Survival When Compared to Single-Agent Capecitabine in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Claudio Vernieri; Michele Prisciandaro; Federico Nichetti; Riccardo Lobefaro; Giorgia Peverelli; Francesca Ligorio; Emma Zattarin; Maria Silvia Cona; Pierangela Sepe; Francesca Corti; Sara Manglaviti; Marta Brambilla; Barbara Re; Antonino Belfiore; Giancarlo Pruneri; Luigi Celio; Gabriella Mariani; Giulia Valeria Bianchi; Licia Rivoltini; Giuseppe Capri; Filippo de Braud
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Adjuvant Capecitabine in Combination With Docetaxel, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide for Early Breast Cancer: The Randomized Clinical FinXX Trial.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Riikka Huovinen; Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen; Minna Tanner; Riitta Kokko; Johan Ahlgren; Päivi Auvinen; Outi Lahdenperä; Sanna Kosonen; Kenneth Villman; Paul Nyandoto; Greger Nilsson; Paula Poikonen-Saksela; Vesa Kataja; Jouni Junnila; Petri Bono; Henrik Lindman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  Role of taxane and anthracycline combination regimens in the management of advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Ruinian Zheng; Shuai Han; Chongyang Duan; Kexu Chen; Zhijian You; Jun Jia; Shunhuan Lin; Liming Liang; Aixue Liu; Huidong Long; Senming Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Use of Taxanes in Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer - a Status Report.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Frederik Marmé; Marc Thill
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Efficacy of Sequential Capecitabine on Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xun Xi; Xingwei Huang; Huozhong Yuan; Jun Ni; Fulan Yang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 7.  Combination versus sequential single agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel F Dear; Kevin McGeechan; Marisa C Jenkins; Alexandra Barratt; Martin H N Tattersall; Nicholas Wilcken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-18

8.  Defining the optimal sequence for the systemic treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Mestres; A B iMolins; L C Martínez; J I C López-Muñiz; E C Gil; A de Juan Ferré; S Del Barco Berrón; Y F Pérez; J G Mata; A G Palomo; J G Gregori; P G Pardo; J J I Mañas; A L Hernández; E M de Dueñas; N M Jáñez; S M Murillo; J S Bofill; P Z Auñón; P Sanchez-Rovira
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.405

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.