Heikki Joensuu1, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen2, Riikka Huovinen3, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen4, Minna Tanner2, Riitta Kokko5, Johan Ahlgren6, Päivi Auvinen7, Outi Lahdenperä3, Sanna Kosonen8, Kenneth Villman9, Paul Nyandoto10, Greger Nilsson11, Paula Poikonen-Saksela1, Vesa Kataja12, Jouni Junnila13, Petri Bono1, Henrik Lindman11. 1. Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 2. Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 3. Department of Oncology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland. 4. Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland. 5. Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland. 6. Gävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden. 7. Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. 8. Kotka Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland. 9. Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden. 10. Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland. 11. Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. 12. Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland12Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland. 13. 4Pharma, Turku, Finland.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Capecitabine is not considered a standard agent in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. The results of this study suggest that addition of adjuvant capecitabine to a regimen that contains docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide improves survival outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of capecitabine on long-term survival outcomes of patients with early breast cancer, particularly in subgroups defined by cancer estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) content, and HER2 content (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is an exploratory analysis of the multicenter FinXX randomized clinical trial that accrued 1500 women in Finland and Sweden between January 27, 2004, and May 29, 2007. About half received 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (T+CEF), while the other half received 3 cycles of docetaxel plus capecitabine followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine (TX+CEX). Data analysis took place between January 27, 2004, and December 31, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Following random allocation, 747 women received T+CEF, and 753 women received TX+CEX. Five patients were excluded from the intention-to-treat population (3 had overt distant metastases at the time of randomization; 2 withdrew consent). The median age of the remaining 1495 patients was 53 years at the time of study entry; 157 (11%) had axillary node-negative disease; 1142 (76%) had ER-positive cancer; and 282 (19%) had HER2-positive cancer. The median follow-up time after random allocation was 10.3 years. There was no significant difference in RFS or overall survival between the groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; P = .23; and HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.66-1.07; P = .15; respectively). Breast cancer-specific survival tended to favor the capecitabine group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.04; P = .10). When RFS and survival of the patients were compared within the subgroups defined by cancer steroid hormone receptor status (ER and/or PR positive vs ER and PR negative) and HER2 status (positive vs negative), TX+CEX was more effective than T+CEF in the subset of patients with TNBC (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.92; P = .02; and HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.31-0.96; P = .03; respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Capecitabine administration with docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide did not prolong RFS or survival compared with a regimen that contained only standard agents. Patients with TNBC had favorable survival outcomes when treated with the capecitabine-containing regimen in an exploratory subgroup analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00114816.
IMPORTANCE: Capecitabine is not considered a standard agent in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. The results of this study suggest that addition of adjuvant capecitabine to a regimen that contains docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide improves survival outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of capecitabine on long-term survival outcomes of patients with early breast cancer, particularly in subgroups defined by cancer estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) content, and HER2 content (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is an exploratory analysis of the multicenter FinXX randomized clinical trial that accrued 1500 women in Finland and Sweden between January 27, 2004, and May 29, 2007. About half received 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (T+CEF), while the other half received 3 cycles of docetaxel plus capecitabine followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine (TX+CEX). Data analysis took place between January 27, 2004, and December 31, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Following random allocation, 747 women received T+CEF, and 753 women received TX+CEX. Five patients were excluded from the intention-to-treat population (3 had overt distant metastases at the time of randomization; 2 withdrew consent). The median age of the remaining 1495 patients was 53 years at the time of study entry; 157 (11%) had axillary node-negative disease; 1142 (76%) had ER-positive cancer; and 282 (19%) had HER2-positive cancer. The median follow-up time after random allocation was 10.3 years. There was no significant difference in RFS or overall survival between the groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; P = .23; and HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.66-1.07; P = .15; respectively). Breast cancer-specific survival tended to favor the capecitabine group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.04; P = .10). When RFS and survival of the patients were compared within the subgroups defined by cancer steroid hormone receptor status (ER and/or PR positive vs ER and PR negative) and HER2 status (positive vs negative), TX+CEX was more effective than T+CEF in the subset of patients with TNBC (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.92; P = .02; and HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.31-0.96; P = .03; respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Capecitabine administration with docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide did not prolong RFS or survival compared with a regimen that contained only standard agents. Patients with TNBC had favorable survival outcomes when treated with the capecitabine-containing regimen in an exploratory subgroup analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00114816.
Authors: Alberto Ravaioli; Giuseppe Pasini; Antonio Polselli; Maximilian Papi; Davide Tassinari; Valentina Arcangeli; Carlo Milandri; Dino Amadori; Matteo Bravi; Daniela Rossi; Pier Paolo Fattori; Enzo Pasquini; Ilaria Panzini Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Hartmut Koeppen; Yuanyuan Xiao; Mark R Lackner; Devchand Paul; Christopher Stokoe; John Pippen; Lea Krekow; Frankie Ann Holmes; Svetislava Vukelja; Deborah Lindquist; Scot Sedlacek; Ragene Rivera; Robert Brooks; Kristi McIntyre; Carrie Brownstein; Silke Hoersch; Joanne L Blum; Stephen Jones Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Heikki Joensuu; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Riikka Huovinen; Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen; Minna Tanner; Riitta Kokko; Johan Ahlgren; Päivi Auvinen; Outi Paija; Leena Helle; Kenneth Villman; Paul Nyandoto; Greger Nilsson; Marjo Pajunen; Raija Asola; Paula Poikonen; Mika Leinonen; Vesa Kataja; Petri Bono; Henrik Lindman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gunter von Minckwitz; Bettina Conrad; Toralf Reimer; Thomas Decker; Holger Eidtmann; Wolfgang Eiermann; John Hackmann; Volker Möbus; Frederik Marmé; Jochem Potenberg; Elmar Stickeler; Eike Simon; Christoph Thomssen; Jens Huober; Carsten Denkert; Joachim Alfer; Christian Jackisch; Valentina Nekljudova; Nicole Burchardi; Sibylle Loibl Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M Miwa; M Ura; M Nishida; N Sawada; T Ishikawa; K Mori; N Shimma; I Umeda; H Ishitsuka Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Catherine M Kelly; Marjorie C Green; Kristine Broglio; Eva S Thomas; Abenaa M Brewster; Vicente Valero; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Daniel J Booser; Ronald S Walters; Kelly K Hunt; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Aman U Buzdar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew M Wardley; Xavier Pivot; Flavia Morales-Vasquez; Luis M Zetina; Maria de Fátima Dias Gaui; Douglas Otero Reyes; Jacek Jassem; Claire Barton; Peter Button; Veronica Hersberger; Antonio Antón Torres Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Curigliano; H J Burstein; E P Winer; M Gnant; P Dubsky; S Loibl; M Colleoni; M M Regan; M Piccart-Gebhart; H-J Senn; B Thürlimann; F André; J Baselga; J Bergh; H Bonnefoi; S Y Brucker; F Cardoso; L Carey; E Ciruelos; J Cuzick; C Denkert; A Di Leo; B Ejlertsen; P Francis; V Galimberti; J Garber; B Gulluoglu; P Goodwin; N Harbeck; D F Hayes; C-S Huang; J Huober; K Hussein; J Jassem; Z Jiang; P Karlsson; M Morrow; R Orecchia; K C Osborne; O Pagani; A H Partridge; K Pritchard; J Ro; E J T Rutgers; F Sedlmayer; V Semiglazov; Z Shao; I Smith; M Toi; A Tutt; G Viale; T Watanabe; T J Whelan; B Xu Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Tim Schauer; Anna Henriksson; Emelie Strandberg; Henrik Lindman; Sveinung Berntsen; Ingrid Demmelmaier; Truls Raastad; Karin Nordin; Jesper F Christensen Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-10-21 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Suzette Delaloge; Martine Piccart; Emiel Rutgers; Saskia Litière; Laura J van 't Veer; Franchette van den Berkmortel; Etienne Brain; Aleksandra Dudek-Peric; Miguel Gil-Gil; Patricia Gomez; Florentine S Hilbers; Zaman Khalil; Susan Knox; Sherko Kuemmel; Georg Kunz; Anne Lesur; Jean-Yves Pierga; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Alastair M Thompson; Giuseppe Viale; Gabriele Zoppoli; Peter Vuylsteke; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Coralie Poncet; Jan Bogaerts; Fatima Cardoso Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-05-26