Background: Single-agent capecitabine (C) is a moderately effective chemotherapeutic compound in the treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The capecitabine-vinorelbine (CV) combination is also used due to a good tolerability profile, but no studies have demonstrated its superiority over single-agent C. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with HER2-negative mBC treated with CV vs. single-agent C. Results: Out of 290 patients included in this study, 127 (43.8%) received single-agent C, while 163 (56.2%) patients were treated with CV. Median PFS was similar in patients treated with single-agent C or CV, while CV was associated with significantly longer OS in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC. This OS advantage was confirmed at multivariable analysis also after propensity score-based matching of patients according to relevant clinical or tumor characteristics. When compared with single-agent C, CV was associated with higher incidence of G3/G4 and any-grade nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and increased transaminases. Conclusions: While prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings, the potential OS advantage of CV over single-agent C in HR+ mBC patients must be weighed against a significantly higher incidence of AEs.
Background: Single-agent capecitabine (C) is a moderately effective chemotherapeutic compound in the treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The capecitabine-vinorelbine (CV) combination is also used due to a good tolerability profile, but no studies have demonstrated its superiority over single-agent C. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with HER2-negative mBC treated with CV vs. single-agent C. Results: Out of 290 patients included in this study, 127 (43.8%) received single-agent C, while 163 (56.2%) patients were treated with CV. Median PFS was similar in patients treated with single-agent C or CV, while CV was associated with significantly longer OS in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC. This OS advantage was confirmed at multivariable analysis also after propensity score-based matching of patients according to relevant clinical or tumor characteristics. When compared with single-agent C, CV was associated with higher incidence of G3/G4 and any-grade nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and increased transaminases. Conclusions: While prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings, the potential OS advantage of CV over single-agent C in HR+ mBC patients must be weighed against a significantly higher incidence of AEs.
Entities:
Keywords:
advanced breast cancer; adverse events; capecitabine; chemotherapy; hormone receptor-positive breast cancer; overall survival; progression-free survival; triple-negative breast cancer; vinorelbine
Authors: J Cliff; A L Jorgensen; R Lord; F Azam; L Cossar; D F Carr; M Pirmohamed Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: V Lorusso; M Spada; M Giampaglia; A Misino; R Calabrese; A Latorre; G Monticelli; M Guida; D Sambiasi; G Colucci Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jindrich Finek; Lubos Holubec; Tomas Svoboda; Lucie Sefrhansova; Ivana Pavlikova; Marie Votavova; Marcela Sediva; Stanislav Filip; Renata Kozevnikova; Stanislav Kormunda Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Peter A Kaufman; Ahmad Awada; Chris Twelves; Louise Yelle; Edith A Perez; Galina Velikova; Martin S Olivo; Yi He; Corina E Dutcus; Javier Cortes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544