Literature DB >> 23524046

Patterns of use and comparative effectiveness of bleeding avoidance strategies in men and women following percutaneous coronary interventions: an observational study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Stacie L Daugherty1, Lauren E Thompson, Sunghee Kim, Sunil V Rao, Sumeet Subherwal, Thomas T Tsai, John C Messenger, Frederick A Masoudi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compared the use and effectiveness of bleeding avoidance strategies (BAS) by sex.
BACKGROUND: Women have higher rates of bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: Among 570,777 men (67.5%) and women (32.5%) who underwent PCI in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's CathPCI Registry between July 1, 2009 and March 31, 2011, in-hospital bleeding rates and the use of BAS (vascular closure devices, bivalirudin, radial approach, and their combinations) were assessed. The relative risk of bleeding for each BAS compared with no BAS was determined in women and men using multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for clinical characteristics and the propensity for receiving BAS. Finally, the absolute risk differences in bleeding associated with BAS were compared.
RESULTS: Overall, the use of any BAS differed slightly between women and men (75.4% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.01). When BAS was not used, women had significantly higher rates of bleeding than men (12.5% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.01). Both sexes had similar adjusted risk reductions of bleeding when any BAS was used (women, odds ratio: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57 to 0.63; men, odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.65). Women and men had lower absolute bleeding risks with BAS; however, these absolute risk differences were greater in women (6.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Women continue to have almost twice the rate of bleeding following PCI. The use of any BAS was associated with a similarly lower risk of bleeding for men and women; however, the absolute risk differences were substantially higher in women. These data underscore the importance of applying effective strategies to limit post-PCI bleeding, especially in women.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23524046      PMCID: PMC3667414          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  24 in total

1.  The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): building a national clinical data repository.

Authors:  R G Brindis; S Fitzgerald; H V Anderson; R E Shaw; W S Weintraub; J F Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Matthew T Roe; John C Messenger; William S Weintraub; Christopher P Cannon; Gregg C Fonarow; David Dai; Anita Y Chen; Lloyd W Klein; Frederick A Masoudi; Charles McKay; Kathleen Hewitt; Ralph G Brindis; Eric D Peterson; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention and adjunctive pharmacotherapy in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alexandra J Lansky; Judith S Hochman; Patricia A Ward; Gary S Mintz; Rosalind Fabunmi; Peter B Berger; Gishel New; Cindy L Grines; Cody G Pietras; Morton J Kern; Margaret Ferrell; Martin B Leon; Roxana Mehran; Christopher White; Jennifer H Mieres; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Gender differences in adverse outcomes after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

Authors:  Claire S Duvernoy; Dean E Smith; Prerana Manohar; Ann Schaefer; Eva Kline-Rogers; David Share; Richard McNamara; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauro Moscucci
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Impact of bleeding severity on clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Kristi O'Grady; Karen S Pieper; Christopher B Granger; L Kristin Newby; Frans Van de Werf; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Robert M Califf; Robert A Harrington
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Gender differences in short-term cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Edgar Argulian; Amar D Patel; Jerome L Abramson; Aniket Kulkarni; Kimberly Champney; Spencer Palmer; William Weintraub; Nanette K Wenger; Viola Vaccarino
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Kari Niemelä; Denis Xavier; Petr Widimsky; Andrzej Budaj; Vicent Valentin; Basil S Lewis; Alvaro Avezum; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Sunil V Rao; John Cairns; Susan Chrolavicius; Salim Yusuf; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Association between use of bleeding avoidance strategies and risk of periprocedural bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Steven P Marso; Amit P Amin; John A House; Kevin F Kennedy; John A Spertus; Sunil V Rao; David J Cohen; John C Messenger; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Significantly improved vascular complications among women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.

Authors:  Bina Ahmed; Winthrop D Piper; David Malenka; Peter VerLee; John Robb; Thomas Ryan; Michael Herne; William Phillips; Harold L Dauerman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.546

View more
  16 in total

1.  The comparative efficacy of bivalirudin is markedly attenuated by use of radial access: insights from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.

Authors:  Emily Perdoncin; Milan Seth; Simon Dixon; Louis Cannon; Akshay Khandelwal; Arthur Riba; Shukri David; David Wohns; Hitinder Gurm
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Vascular Access-Related Complications in Women: Temporal Trends, Emerging Data, and the Current State of Interventional Cardiology Practice.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; Rushi V Parikh; Jennifer A Tremmel
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Effectiveness of Arterial Closure Devices for Preventing Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; Eric A Secemsky; Laura Mauri; Matthew T Roe; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; David Dai; James M McCabe; Frederic S Resnic; Hitinder S Gurm; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure: unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women).

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Sunil V Rao; David F Kong; Laura H Aberle; Kevin J Anstrom; C Michael Gibson; Ian C Gilchrist; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjit S Jolly; Roxana Mehran; John C Messenger; L Kristin Newby; Ron Waksman; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sex Differences in 1-Year Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Melissa M Farmer; Maggie A Stanislawski; Mary E Plomondon; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Nataria T Joseph; Lauren E Thompson; Jessica L Zuchowski; Stacie L Daugherty; Elizabeth M Yano; P Michael Ho
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  Gender differences in cardiovascular therapy: focus on antithrombotic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Julinda Mehilli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Sex Differences in Incidence, Etiology, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Tayyab Shah; Sohum Kapadia; Alexandra J Lansky; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Cardiovascular Disease in Women Across the Lifespan: The Importance of Sleep.

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; Jason R Carter; Ghada Bourjeily
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Sex differences in cardiovascular disease - Impact on care and outcomes.

Authors:  K H Humphries; M Izadnegahdar; T Sedlak; J Saw; N Johnston; K Schenck-Gustafsson; R U Shah; V Regitz-Zagrosek; J Grewal; V Vaccarino; J Wei; C N Bairey Merz
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 8.333

Review 10.  Sex-Specific Outcomes in Cardiovascular Device Evaluations.

Authors:  Mohammed Imran Ghare; Daniela Tirziu; Jinnette Dawn Abbott; Elissa Altin; Yiping Yang; Vivian Ng; Cindy Grines; Alexandra Lansky
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.