Literature DB >> 26377400

The comparative efficacy of bivalirudin is markedly attenuated by use of radial access: insights from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.

Emily Perdoncin1, Milan Seth2, Simon Dixon3, Louis Cannon4, Akshay Khandelwal5, Arthur Riba6, Shukri David7, David Wohns8, Hitinder Gurm9.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the relative impact of bivalirudin on bleeding outcomes associated with trans-radial interventions (TRI) in real world practice. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2010 and March 2014 at the 47 hospitals participating in the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) were utilized. Propensity matching was used within cohorts defined by access site. The impact of bivalirudin use on in-hospital outcomes was evaluated with Fisher's exact tests. Among patients undergoing trans-femoral interventions (TFI), use of bivalirudin was associated with a reduction in bleeding compared with both glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI; 1.67 vs. 3.46%, absolute risk reduction (ARR) 1.79%, odds ratio, OR, 0.47, confidence interval, CI, 0.41-0.54, number needed to treat, NNT 56, P < 0.001) and heparin (1.26 vs. 1.76%, ARR 0.5%, OR 0.71, CI 0.61-0.82, NNT 197, P < 0.001). Among patients undergoing TRI, there was a more modest absolute reduction in bleeding with bivalirudin compared with GPI (0.79 vs. 1.41%, ARR 0.62%, OR 0.56, CI 0.34-0.90, NNT 161, P = 0.016) and no difference in bleeding compared with heparin (0.46 vs. 0.46%, OR 1, CI 0.54-1.84, P = 1).
CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin is markedly efficacious in reducing bleeding in patients undergoing TFI. The reduction in bleeding associated with bivalirudin use is minimal to absent in patients undergoing TRI. Given its lower cost and comparable outcomes, heparin should be the preferred anticoagulation strategy in those undergoing radial PCI. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bivalirudin; Bleeding; Radial access

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377400      PMCID: PMC4917745          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  26 in total

1.  Association of a continuous quality improvement initiative with practice and outcome variations of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Mauro Moscucci; Eva Kline Rogers; Cecelia Montoye; Dean E Smith; David Share; Michael O'Donnell; Ann Maxwell-Eward; William L Meengs; Anthony C De Franco; Kirit Patel; Richard McNamara; John G McGinnity; Sandeep M Jani; Sanjaya Khanal; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Bleeding, blood transfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for contemporary practice.

Authors:  Brendan J Doyle; Charanjit S Rihal; Dennis A Gastineau; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Cost-effectiveness of targeting patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for therapy with bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy according to predicted risk of bleeding.

Authors:  Amit P Amin; Steven P Marso; Sunil V Rao; John Messenger; Paul S Chan; John House; Kevin Kennedy; Katherine Robertus; David J Cohen; Elizabeth M Mahoney
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-20

4.  Balancing the risks of stent thrombosis and major bleeding during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Antonio Gutierrez; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Novel approaches for preventing or limiting events (Naples) III trial: randomized comparison of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients at increased risk of bleeding undergoing transfemoral elective coronary stenting.

Authors:  Carlo Briguori; Gabriella Visconti; Amelia Focaccio; Michael Donahue; Bruno Golia; Lucio Selvetella; Bruno Ricciardelli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Salim Yusuf; John Cairns; Kari Niemelä; Denis Xavier; Petr Widimsky; Andrzej Budaj; Matti Niemelä; Vicent Valentin; Basil S Lewis; Alvaro Avezum; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Sunil V Rao; Peggy Gao; Rizwan Afzal; Campbell D Joyner; Susan Chrolavicius; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the REPLACE-2 trial.

Authors:  David J Cohen; A Michael Lincoff; Tara A Lavelle; Huei-Ling Chen; Ameet Bakhai; Ronna H Berezin; Daniel Jackman; Ian J Sarembock; Eric J Topol
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Benefit of bivalirudin versus heparin after transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jimmy MacHaalany; Eltigani Abdelaal; Yoann Bataille; Guillaume Plourde; Pierre Duranleau-Gagnon; Éric Larose; Jean-Pierre Déry; Gérald Barbeau; Stéphane Rinfret; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Robert De Larochellière; Louis Roy; Olivier Costerousse; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).

Authors:  Dmitriy N Feldman; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Dmitri V Baklanov; Luke K Kim; S Chiu Wong; Robert M Minutello; John C Messenger; Issam Moussa; Kirk N Garratt; Robert N Piana; William B Hillegass; Mauricio G Cohen; Ian C Gilchrist; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Bivalirudin is superior to heparins alone with bailout GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transported emergently for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the EUROMAX trial.

Authors:  Uwe Zeymer; Arnoud van 't Hof; Jennifer Adgey; Lutz Nibbe; Peter Clemmensen; Claudio Cavallini; Jurrien ten Berg; Pierre Coste; Kurt Huber; Efthymios N Deliargyris; Jonathan Day; Debra Bernstein; Patrick Goldstein; Christian Hamm; Philippe Gabriel Steg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  3 in total

1.  Exploring the Healthcare Value of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Appropriateness, Outcomes, and Costs in Michigan Hospitals.

Authors:  Daniel M Alyesh; Milan Seth; David C Miller; James M Dupree; John Syrjamaki; Devraj Sukul; Simon Dixon; Eve A Kerr; Hitinder S Gurm; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-06

2.  The comparative safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in patients on dialysis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan cardiovascular consortium.

Authors:  Devraj Sukul; Milan Seth; Theodore Schreiber; Akshay Khandelwal; Louis A Cannon; Thomas A LaLonde; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Joseph Ebinger; Timothy Henry; Sungjin Kim; Moira Inkelas; Susan Cheng; Teryl Nuckols
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.