Literature DB >> 23516053

Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: a prospective study.

Joseph B Webster1, Kevin N Hakimi, Rhonda M Williams, Aaron P Turner, Daniel C Norvell, Joseph M Czerniecki.   

Abstract

Providing a satisfactory, functional prosthesis following lower-limb amputation is a primary goal of rehabilitation. The objectives of this study were to describe the rate of successful prosthetic fitting over a 12 mo period; describe prosthetic use after amputation; and determine factors associated with greater prosthetic fitting, function, and satisfaction. The study design was a multicenter prospective cohort study of individuals undergoing their first major lower-limb amputation because of vascular disease and/or diabetes. At 4 mo, unsuccessful prosthetic fitting was significantly associated with depression, prior arterial reconstruction, diabetes, and pain in the residual limb. At 12 mo, 92% of all subjects were fit with a prosthetic limb and individuals with transfemoral amputation were significantly less likely to have a prosthesis fit. Age older than 55 yr, diagnosis of a major depressive episode, and history of renal dialysis were associated with fewer hours of prosthetic walking. Subjects who were older, had experienced a major depressive episode, and/or were diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had greater functional restriction. Thus, while most individuals achieve successful prosthetic fitting by 1 yr following a first major nontraumatic lower-limb amputation, a number of medical variables and psychosocial factors are associated with prosthetic fitting, utilization, and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23516053     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2012.01.0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  23 in total

1.  Predictors of Receiving a Prosthesis for Adults With Above-Knee Amputations in a Well-Defined Population.

Authors:  Benjamin F Mundell; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Sue Visscher; Kurtis M Hoppe; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Clinician's Commentary on Imam et al.

Authors:  Sander L Hitzig; Amanda L Mayo
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF INTERVENTIONS FOR TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES: A SCOPING REVIEW OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES.

Authors:  M Jason Highsmith; Jason T Kahle; Amanda Lewandowski; Tyler D Klenow; John J Orriola; Rebecca M Miro; Owen T Hill; Sylvia Ursula Raschke; Michael S Orendurff; James T Highsmith; Bryce S Sutton
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09-01

4.  PREDICTING WALKING ABILITY FOLLOWING LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.

Authors:  Jason T Kahle; M Jason Highsmith; Hans Schaepper; Anton Johannesson; Michael S Orendurff; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Predicting successful prosthetic rehabilitation in major lower-limb amputation patients: a 15-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Inés Fajardo-Martos; Olga Roda; Ramón Zambudio-Periago; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Indalecio Sánchez-Montesinos
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Air microfluidics-enabled soft robotic transtibial prosthesis socket liner toward dynamic management of residual limb contact pressure and volume fluctuation.

Authors:  Peter S Lee; Run Ze Gao; Alyson Colpitts; Robin W Murdock; Doug Dittmer; Andreas Schirm; James Y Tung; Carolyn L Ren
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.258

7.  Differences in Physical Performance Measures Among Patients With Unilateral Lower-Limb Amputations Classified as Functional Level K3 Versus K4.

Authors:  Jaclyn Megan Sions; Emma Haldane Beisheim; Tara Jo Manal; Sarah Carolyn Smith; John Robert Horne; Frank Bernard Sarlo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Deleterious Musculoskeletal Conditions Secondary to Lower Limb Loss: Considerations for Prosthesis-Related Factors.

Authors:  Ashley D Knight; Christopher L Dearth; Brad D Hendershot
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Ivan Vujaklija; Rickard Brånemark; Anthony M J Bull; Hans Dietl; Bernhard Graimann; Levi J Hargrove; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; He Helen Huang; Thorvaldur Ingvarsson; Hilmar Bragi Janusson; Kristleifur Kristjánsson; Todd Kuiken; Silvestro Micera; Thomas Stieglitz; Agnes Sturma; Dustin Tyler; Richard F Ff Weir; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 25.671

10.  Synergizing microfluidics with soft robotics: A perspective on miniaturization and future directions.

Authors:  Run Ze Gao; Carolyn L Ren
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.