Literature DB >> 26690021

Predictors of Receiving a Prosthesis for Adults With Above-Knee Amputations in a Well-Defined Population.

Benjamin F Mundell1, Hilal Maradit Kremers2, Sue Visscher3, Kurtis M Hoppe4, Kenton R Kaufman5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have identified age as a factor in determining an individual's likelihood of receiving a prosthesis following a lower limb amputation. These studies are limited to specific subsets of the general population and are unable to account for preamputation characteristics within their study populations. Our study seeks to determine the effect of preamputation characteristics on the probability of receiving a prosthesis for the general population in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To identify preamputation characteristics that predict of the likelihood of receiving a prosthesis following an above-knee amputation.
DESIGN: A retrospective, population-based cohort study.
SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota (2010 population: 144,248). PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (n = 93) over the age of 18 years who underwent an above-knee amputation, that is, knee disarticulation or transfemoral amputation, while residing in Olmsted County, MN, between 1987 and 2013.
METHODS: Characteristics affecting the receipt of a prosthesis were analyzed using a logistic regression and a random forest algorithm for classification trees. Preamputation characteristics included age, gender, amputation etiology, year of amputation, mobility, cognitive ability, comorbidities, and time between surgery and the prosthesis decision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The association of preamputation characteristics with the receipt of a prosthesis following an above-knee amputation.
RESULTS: Twenty-four of the participants received a prosthesis. The odds of receiving a prosthesis were almost 30 times higher in those able to walk independently prior to an amputation relative to those who could not walk independently. A 10-year increase in age was associated with a 53.8% decrease in the likelihood of being fit for a prosthesis (odds ratio = 0.462, P =.030). Time elapsed between surgery and the prosthesis decision was associated with a rise in probability of receiving a prosthesis for the first 3 months in the random forest algorithm. No other observed characteristics were associated with receipt of a prosthesis.
CONCLUSIONS: The association of preamputation mobility and age with the likelihood of being fit for a prosthesis is well understood. The effect of age, after controlling for confounders, still persists and is associated with the likelihood of being fit for a prosthesis.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26690021      PMCID: PMC4959960          DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  22 in total

1.  Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schaffalitzky; Pamela Gallagher; Malcolm Maclachlan; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Major lower limb amputations in the Marshall Islands: incidence, prosthetic prescription, and prosthetic use after 6-18 months.

Authors:  Katherine Harding
Journal:  Pac Health Dialog       Date:  2005-03

Review 3.  Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sansam; Vera Neumann; Rory O'Connor; Bipin Bhakta
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  What risk factors predict usage of gastrocsoleus recession during tibial lengthening?

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Samuel Zonshayn; Saravanaraja Muthusamy; Eugene W Borst; Austin T Fragomen; Joseph T Nguyen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Predicting prosthetic use in elderly patients after major lower limb amputation.

Authors:  Monica Spruit- van Eijk; Harmen van der Linde; Bianca Buijck; Alexander Geurts; Sytse Zuidema; Raymond Koopmans
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Non traumatic lower extremity amputations in younger patients: an 11-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Jessica W S Chin; Laura Teague; Ann-Marie McLaren; James L Mahoney
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Predicting the outcome of intramuscular psoas lengthening in children with cerebral palsy using preoperative gait data and the random forest algorithm.

Authors:  Michael H Schwartz; Adam Rozumalski; Walter Truong; Tom F Novacheck
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Which patients with knee problems are likely to benefit from nonarthroplasty surgery? Development of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Jerry Avorn; Asra Warsi; Charles H Brown; Scott Martin; Tamara L Martin; John Wright; Michele Burgener; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-03-08

10.  Statistics review 14: Logistic regression.

Authors:  Viv Bewick; Liz Cheek; Jonathan Ball
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

1.  Low Back Pain in Adults With Transfemoral Amputation: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Marianne Luetmer; Benjamin Mundell; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Sue Visscher; Kurtis M Hoppe; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Symmetry function in gait pattern analysis in patients after unilateral transfemoral amputation using a mechanical or microprocessor prosthetic knee.

Authors:  Mateusz Kowal; Sławomir Winiarski; Ewa Gieysztor; Anna Kołcz; Karolina Walewicz; Wojciech Borowicz; Alicja Rutkowska-Kucharska; Małgorzata Paprocka-Borowicz
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  A Prospective Assessment of an Adjustable, Immediate Fit, Subischial Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Authors:  Timothy R Dillingham; Jessica L Kenia; Frances S Shofer; James S Marschalek
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Suitability of 'Guidelines for Screening of Prosthetic Candidates: Lower Limb' for the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Luphiwo L Mduzana; Surona Visagie; Gubela Mji
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2018-01-30

5.  The risk of major cardiovascular events for adults with transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Benjamin F Mundell; Marianne T Luetmer; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Sue Visscher; Kurtis M Hoppe; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the microprocessor-controlled knee C-Leg in transfemoral amputees with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Alexander Kuhlmann; Henning Krüger; Susanne Seidinger; Andreas Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-01-02

7.  The Role of Earlier Receipt of a Lower Limb Prosthesis on Emergency Department Utilization.

Authors:  Taavy A Miller; Rajib Paul; Melinda Forthofer; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.