Literature DB >> 32320367

Deleterious Musculoskeletal Conditions Secondary to Lower Limb Loss: Considerations for Prosthesis-Related Factors.

Ashley D Knight1,2,3, Christopher L Dearth1,2,3, Brad D Hendershot1,2,3.   

Abstract

Significance: The intent of this work was to summarize the existing evidence of, and highlight knowledge gaps specific to, prosthetic devices/componentry and training regimes, particularly in the context of the human-device interaction and deleterious musculoskeletal conditions secondary to lower limb loss. Recent Advances: With the recent and evolving technological advancements in prostheses, there are numerous devices available to individuals with lower limb loss. Current literature demonstrates the importance of expanding the knowledge of all prosthetic device-specific factors and the significance of proper prescription, fit, and alignment, along with adequate device-/activity-specific training, to enhance human-device interaction, reduce gait abnormalities and compensatory motions, and as a result, mitigate risk for secondary musculoskeletal conditions. Critical Issues: Inadequate device prescription, fit, alignment, and training are evident owing to the lack of knowledge or awareness of the many device-specific properties and factors, leading to suboptimal use, as well as, biomechanical compensations, which collectively and adversely affect the function, activity level, and overall health of the prosthesis user. Future Directions: To maximize optimal outcomes after lower limb loss, it is essential to better appreciate the factors that affect both prosthesis use and satisfaction, particularly any modifiable factors that might be targeted in rehabilitation interventions such as device prescription, fit/alignment, and training regimes. A better understanding of such device-specific factors will help enhance the human-device interaction and resulting functional performance, thereby reducing secondary musculoskeletal conditions, allowing for the readiness of the fighting force (return-to-duty/redeployment) and/or improved reintegration into civilian society/work, and overall enhancing quality of life after lower limb loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amputation; biomechanics; extremity trauma; human–device interaction; prosthetic prescription; prosthetic training

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32320367      PMCID: PMC8568798          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2019.1079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  102 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetic liners for lower limb amputees: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Glenn K Klute; Brian C Glaister; Jocelyn S Berge
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Upslope walking with a powered knee and ankle prosthesis: initial results with an amputee subject.

Authors:  Frank Sup; Huseyin Atakan Varol; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  Exercise programs to improve gait performance in people with lower limb amputation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Christopher Kevin Wong; Julie E Ehrlich; Jennifer C Ersing; Nicholas J Maroldi; Catharine E Stevenson; Matthew J Varca
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Transtibial amputee gait during slope walking with the unity suspension system.

Authors:  Hossein Gholizadeh; Edward D Lemaire; Emily H Sinitski
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Limb deficiency and prosthetic management. 1. Decision making in prosthetic prescription and management.

Authors:  Virginia S Nelson; Katherine M Flood; Phillip R Bryant; Mark E Huang; Paul F Pasquina; Toni L Roberts
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Effects of sagittal plane prosthetic alignment on standing trans-tibial amputee knee loads.

Authors:  S Blumentritt; T Schmalz; R Jarasch; M Schneider
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  My prosthesis as a part of me: a qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb.

Authors:  Mari Lundberg; Kerstin Hagberg; Jennifer Bullington
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Differences in Physical Performance Measures Among Patients With Unilateral Lower-Limb Amputations Classified as Functional Level K3 Versus K4.

Authors:  Jaclyn Megan Sions; Emma Haldane Beisheim; Tara Jo Manal; Sarah Carolyn Smith; John Robert Horne; Frank Bernard Sarlo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Osseointegrated Percutaneous Prosthetic System for the Treatment of Patients With Transfemoral Amputation: A Prospective Five-year Follow-up of Patient-reported Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Rickard P Brånemark; Kerstin Hagberg; Katarzyna Kulbacka-Ortiz; Örjan Berlin; Björn Rydevik
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking.

Authors:  Alena M Grabowski; Susan D'Andrea
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.