OBJECTIVE: Total colonoscopy with use of a standard adult colonoscope can be difficult in the presence of a redundant or angulated colon. It is often possible to traverse these areas with the use of a thinner, more flexible endoscope. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of completing total colonoscopy using a push enteroscope when a standard colonoscope was unsuccessful. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed for 721 consecutive colonoscopies attempted by two gastroenterologists. Those patients in whom complete colonoscopy was unsuccessful using the standard colonoscope (Olympus CF-100L) had attempts to complete colonoscopy using the enteroscope (Olympus SIF-100). The extent of each exam was recorded. Additional pathologic findings discovered by the use of the enteroscope and therapeutic interventions performed were additionally noted. RESULTS: Colonoscopy using an enteroscope was performed in 32 patients with successful total colonoscopy in 22 patients (68.7%). Additional pathology was noted in nine patients who had successful complete colonoscopy using the enteroscope; adenomatous polyp (n = 5), adenocarcinoma (n = 1), bleeding source (n = 2), and extent of colitis (n = 1). Total colonoscopy rate using standard adult colonoscope was 93.2% (630 of 676) when cases with poor bowel preparation (n = 23) and obstructing lesions (n = 14) were excluded. When the results of successful colonoscopies with the enteroscope were included, the overall completion rate of total colonoscopy improved to 96.4% (652 of 676). CONCLUSION: The use of the enteroscope to help evaluate patients who have had incomplete colonoscopies with the standard colonoscope increases the diagnostic yield of colonic examination.
OBJECTIVE: Total colonoscopy with use of a standard adult colonoscope can be difficult in the presence of a redundant or angulated colon. It is often possible to traverse these areas with the use of a thinner, more flexible endoscope. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of completing total colonoscopy using a push enteroscope when a standard colonoscope was unsuccessful. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed for 721 consecutive colonoscopies attempted by two gastroenterologists. Those patients in whom complete colonoscopy was unsuccessful using the standard colonoscope (Olympus CF-100L) had attempts to complete colonoscopy using the enteroscope (Olympus SIF-100). The extent of each exam was recorded. Additional pathologic findings discovered by the use of the enteroscope and therapeutic interventions performed were additionally noted. RESULTS: Colonoscopy using an enteroscope was performed in 32 patients with successful total colonoscopy in 22 patients (68.7%). Additional pathology was noted in nine patients who had successful complete colonoscopy using the enteroscope; adenomatous polyp (n = 5), adenocarcinoma (n = 1), bleeding source (n = 2), and extent of colitis (n = 1). Total colonoscopy rate using standard adult colonoscope was 93.2% (630 of 676) when cases with poor bowel preparation (n = 23) and obstructing lesions (n = 14) were excluded. When the results of successful colonoscopies with the enteroscope were included, the overall completion rate of total colonoscopy improved to 96.4% (652 of 676). CONCLUSION: The use of the enteroscope to help evaluate patients who have had incomplete colonoscopies with the standard colonoscope increases the diagnostic yield of colonic examination.