Literature DB >> 23508842

Do young, active patients perceive advantages after surface replacement compared to cementless total hip arthroplasty?

Robert L Barrack1, Erin L Ruh, Michael E Berend, Craig J Della Valle, C Anderson Engh, Javad Parvizi, John C Clohisy, Ryan M Nunley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Potential advantages suggested but not confirmed for surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) over THA include lower frequency of limp, less thigh pain, less limb length discrepancy, and higher activity. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined whether patients having SRA had a limp, thigh pain, or limb length discrepancy less frequently or had activity levels higher than patients having THA.
METHODS: In a multicenter study, we surveyed 806 patients aged 18 to 60 years with a premorbid UCLA activity score of 6 or more who underwent hip arthroplasty for noninflammatory arthritis at one of five orthopaedic centers. Patients had either a cementless THA with an advanced bearing surface (n = 682) or an SRA (n = 124). The patients were demographically comparable. Specific telephone survey instruments were designed to assess limp, thigh pain, perception of limb length, and activity levels. Minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 2.3 years; range, 1.1-3.9 years).
RESULTS: When controlled for age, sex, and premorbid activity level, patients with SRA had a higher incidence of complete absence of any limp, lower incidence of thigh pain, lower incidence of perception of limb length discrepancy, greater ability to walk continuously for more than 60 minutes, higher percentage of patients who ran after surgery, greater distance run, and higher percentage of patients who returned to their most favored recreational activity.
CONCLUSIONS: When interviewed by an independent third party, patients with SRA reported higher levels of function with fewer symptoms and less perception of limb length discrepancy compared to a similar cohort of young, active patients with THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23508842      PMCID: PMC3825884          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2915-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Girard; M Lavigne; P-A Vendittoli; A G Roy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

2.  Unsatisfactory surgical learning curve with hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The patient-specific functional scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics, and application as a clinical outcome measure.

Authors:  Katyana Kowalchuk Horn; Sophie Jennings; Gillian Richardson; Ditte Van Vliet; Cheryl Hefford; J Haxby Abbott
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Lieberman; F Dorey; P Shekelle; L Schumacher; B J Thomas; D J Kilgus; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  S Glyn-Jones; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; H Doll; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-12

6.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

7.  Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Ryan M Nunley; Stephen J Raterman; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Prevalence of cholesterol screening and high blood cholesterol among adults--United States, 2005, 2007, and 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old.

Authors:  P-A Vendittoli; M Lavigne; A-G Roy; D Lusignan
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  7 in total

1.  Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Toby Barrack; Staci R Johnson; Ryan M Nunley; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Letter to the Editor: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Adventure sports and sexual freedom hip replacement: the tripolar hip.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-28

4.  Hip Replacement or Hip Resurfacing with a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Bearing: A Qualitative and Quantitative Preference Study.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-05-11

5.  Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; Erin L Ruh; Jiajing Chen; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Javad Parvizi; Craig J Della Valle; William G Hamilton; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  What Is the Frequency of Noise Generation in Modern Knee Arthroplasty and Is It Associated With Residual Symptoms?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Toby Barrack; Ryan M Nunley; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  An evaluation of proximal femur bone density in young, active patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at one year postoperatively.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Rondek Salih; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.135

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.