Literature DB >> 32632343

Fire behavior and smoke modeling: Model improvement and measurement needs for next-generation smoke research and forecasting systems.

Yongqiang Liu1, Adam Kochanski2, Kirk R Baker3, William Mell1, Rodman Linn4, Ronan Paugam1, Jan Mandel5, Aime Fournier5, Mary Ann Jenkins2, Scott Goodrick1, Gary Achtemeier1, Fengjun Zhao1, Roger Ottmar1, Nancy Hf French6, Narasimhan Larkin1, Timothy Brown7, Andrew Hudak1, Matthew Dickinson1, Brian Potter1, Craig Clements8, Shawn Urbanski1, Susan Prichard9, Adam Watts7, Derek McNamara10.   

Abstract

There is an urgent need for next-generation smoke research and forecasting (SRF) systems to meet the challenges of the growing air quality, health, and safety concerns associated with wildland fire emissions. This review paper presents simulations and experiments of hypothetical prescribed burns with a suite of selected fire behavior and smoke models and identifies major issues for model improvement and the most critical observational needs. The results are used to understand the new and improved capability required for the next-generation SRF systems and to support the design of the Fire and Smoke Model Evaluation Experiment (FASMEE) and other field campaigns. The next-generation SRF systems should have more coupling of fire, smoke, and atmospheric processes to better simulate and forecast vertical smoke distributions and multiple sub-plumes, dynamical and high-resolution fire processes, and local and regional smoke chemistry during day and night. The development of the coupling capability requires comprehensive and spatially and temporally integrated measurements across the various disciplines to characterize flame and energy structure (e.g., individual cells, vertical heat profile and the height of well mixing flaming gases), smoke structure (vertical distributions and multiple sub-plumes), ambient air processes (smoke eddy, entrainment and radiative effects of smoke aerosols), fire emissions (for different fuel types and combustion conditions from flaming to residual smoldering), as well as night-time processes (smoke drainage and super-fog formation).

Keywords:  CMAQ; Daysmoke; FIRETEC; WFDS; WRF-SFIRE-CHEM; burn plan and measurement design

Year:  2019        PMID: 32632343      PMCID: PMC7336523          DOI: 10.1071/wf18204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Wildland Fire        ISSN: 1049-8001            Impact factor:   3.200


  8 in total

1.  Model representation of secondary organic aerosol in CMAQv4.7.

Authors:  Annmarie G Carlton; Prakash V Bhave; Sergey L Napelenok; Edward O Edney; Golam Sarwar; Robert W Pinder; George A Pouliot; Marc Houyoux
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Learning to coexist with wildfire.

Authors:  Max A Moritz; Enric Batllori; Ross A Bradstock; A Malcolm Gill; John Handmer; Paul F Hessburg; Justin Leonard; Sarah McCaffrey; Dennis C Odion; Tania Schoennagel; Alexandra D Syphard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Community Vulnerability to Health Impacts of Wildland Fire Smoke Exposure.

Authors:  Ana G Rappold; Jeanette Reyes; George Pouliot; Wayne E Cascio; David Diaz-Sanchez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data.

Authors:  K R Baker; M C Woody; L Valin; J Szykman; E L Yates; L T Iraci; H D Choi; A J Soja; S N Koplitz; L Zhou; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Jose L Jimenez; J W Hair
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  The recent and future health burden of air pollution apportioned across U.S. sectors.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Charles M Fulcher; Kirk Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Modeling crop residue burning experiments to evaluate smoke emissions and plume transport.

Authors:  Luxi Zhou; Kirk R Baker; Sergey L Napelenok; George Pouliot; Robert Elleman; Susan M O'Neill; Shawn P Urbanski; David C Wong
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  A framework for expanding aqueous chemistry in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.1.

Authors:  Kathleen M Fahey; Annmarie G Carlton; Havala O T Pye; Jaemeen Baek; William T Hutzell; Charles O Stanier; Kirk R Baker; K Wyat Appel; Mohammed Jaoui; John H Offenberg
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.135

8.  Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.

Authors:  K Wyat Appel; Sergey L Napelenok; Kristen M Foley; Havala O T Pye; Christian Hogrefe; Deborah J Luecken; Jesse O Bash; Shawn J Roselle; Jonathan E Pleim; Hosein Foroutan; William T Hutzell; George A Pouliot; Golam Sarwar; Kathleen M Fahey; Brett Gantt; Robert C Gilliam; Nicholas K Heath; Daiwen Kang; Rohit Mathur; Donna B Schwede; Tanya L Spero; David C Wong; Jeffrey O Young
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.135

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  An evaluation of empirical and statistically based smoke plume injection height parametrisations used within air quality models.

Authors:  Joseph L Wilkins; George Pouliot; Thomas Pierce; Amber Soja; Hyundeok Choi; Emily Gargulinski; Robert Gilliam; Jeffrey Vukovich; Matthew S Landis
Journal:  Int J Wildland Fire       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 2.  Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel A Jaffe; Susan M O'Neill; Narasimhan K Larkin; Amara L Holder; David L Peterson; Jessica E Halofsky; Ana G Rappold
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  The Fire and Smoke Model Evaluation Experiment-A Plan for Integrated, Large Fire-Atmosphere Field Campaigns.

Authors:  Susan Prichard; N Sim Larkin; Roger Ottmar; Nancy H F French; Kirk Baker; Tim Brown; Craig Clements; Matt Dickinson; Andrew Hudak; Adam Kochanski; Rod Linn; Yongqiang Liu; Brian Potter; William Mell; Danielle Tanzer; Shawn Urbanski; Adam Watts
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Uncertainty in Health Impact Assessments of Smoke From a Wildfire Event.

Authors:  Megan M Johnson; Fernando Garcia-Menendez
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-01-01

Review 5.  Categorizing and Harmonizing Natural, Technological, and Socio-Economic Perils Following the Catastrophe Modeling Paradigm.

Authors:  Arnaud Mignan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Wildland Fire Emission Sampling at Fishlake National Forest, Utah Using an Unmanned Aircraft System.

Authors:  J Aurell; B Gullett; A Holder; F Kiros; W Mitchell; A Watts; R Ottmar
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.798

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.